From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] allow xenfb initialization for hvm guests
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:49:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CBF7D9.6050602@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103203422.GA2668@phenom.dumpdata.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]
On 2014-01-03 22:34, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 07:02:09PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> The title needs 'xen/fb' prefixed but that is easy enough.
>
>> There is no reasons why an HVM guest shouldn't be allowed to use xenfb.
>> As a matter of fact ARM guests, HVM from Linux POV, can use xenfb.
>> Given that no Xen toolstacks configure a xenfb backend for x86 HVM
>> guests, they are not affected.
>>
>> Please note that at this time QEMU needs few outstanding fixes to
>> provide xenfb on ARM:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=138739419700837&w=2
>
> Cool. Is the video maintainer OK with the Xen maintainers stashing it
> in the Xen tree for Linus?
Yep, fine for me.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
<linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] allow xenfb initialization for hvm guests
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:49:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CBF7D9.6050602@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103203422.GA2668@phenom.dumpdata.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]
On 2014-01-03 22:34, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 07:02:09PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> The title needs 'xen/fb' prefixed but that is easy enough.
>
>> There is no reasons why an HVM guest shouldn't be allowed to use xenfb.
>> As a matter of fact ARM guests, HVM from Linux POV, can use xenfb.
>> Given that no Xen toolstacks configure a xenfb backend for x86 HVM
>> guests, they are not affected.
>>
>> Please note that at this time QEMU needs few outstanding fixes to
>> provide xenfb on ARM:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=138739419700837&w=2
>
> Cool. Is the video maintainer OK with the Xen maintainers stashing it
> in the Xen tree for Linus?
Yep, fine for me.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] allow xenfb initialization for hvm guests
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:49:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CBF7D9.6050602@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103203422.GA2668@phenom.dumpdata.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]
On 2014-01-03 22:34, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 07:02:09PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> The title needs 'xen/fb' prefixed but that is easy enough.
>
>> There is no reasons why an HVM guest shouldn't be allowed to use xenfb.
>> As a matter of fact ARM guests, HVM from Linux POV, can use xenfb.
>> Given that no Xen toolstacks configure a xenfb backend for x86 HVM
>> guests, they are not affected.
>>
>> Please note that at this time QEMU needs few outstanding fixes to
>> provide xenfb on ARM:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=138739419700837&w=2
>
> Cool. Is the video maintainer OK with the Xen maintainers stashing it
> in the Xen tree for Linus?
Yep, fine for me.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-03 19:02 [PATCH v2] allow xenfb initialization for hvm guests Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-03 19:02 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-03 19:02 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-03 20:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-01-03 20:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-01-07 12:49 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2014-01-07 12:49 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-07 12:49 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CBF7D9.6050602@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.