From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: edumazet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
jasowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org,
serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org,
xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
jhs-jkUAjuhPggJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Ding Tianhong
<dingtianhong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net: introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:54:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CBF8EB.6000803@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103.003404.1439874071277993396.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
On 2014/1/3 13:34, David Miller wrote:
> From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:11:04 +0800
>
>>
>> introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff,
>> we can use it to backup sk_classid when net_ns switch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> Sorry, no new sk_buff members unless there is absolutely not other
> possible implementation.
>
I'm kind of banging my head against the wall with this,
but can not think of a better way.
skb_shared_info is the extension for sk_buffer, how about moving into it?
any comments are appreciated!
thanks,
Libo
> sk_buff is too big as-is.
>
> .
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@huawei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <edumazet@google.com>, <jasowang@redhat.com>,
<horms@verge.net.au>, <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
<containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <kaber@trash.net>,
<xemul@openvz.org>, <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
<lizefan@huawei.com>, Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net: introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:54:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CBF8EB.6000803@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103.003404.1439874071277993396.davem@davemloft.net>
On 2014/1/3 13:34, David Miller wrote:
> From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@huawei.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:11:04 +0800
>
>>
>> introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff,
>> we can use it to backup sk_classid when net_ns switch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@huawei.com>
>
> Sorry, no new sk_buff members unless there is absolutely not other
> possible implementation.
>
I'm kind of banging my head against the wall with this,
but can not think of a better way.
skb_shared_info is the extension for sk_buffer, how about moving into it?
any comments are appreciated!
thanks,
Libo
> sk_buff is too big as-is.
>
> .
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <edumazet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<jasowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>,
<serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>,
<kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
<xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
<ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<jhs-jkUAjuhPggJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
<lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Ding Tianhong
<dingtianhong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net: introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:54:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CBF8EB.6000803@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103.003404.1439874071277993396.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
On 2014/1/3 13:34, David Miller wrote:
> From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:11:04 +0800
>
>>
>> introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff,
>> we can use it to backup sk_classid when net_ns switch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> Sorry, no new sk_buff members unless there is absolutely not other
> possible implementation.
>
I'm kind of banging my head against the wall with this,
but can not think of a better way.
skb_shared_info is the extension for sk_buffer, how about moving into it?
any comments are appreciated!
thanks,
Libo
> sk_buff is too big as-is.
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-03 3:11 [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net: introduce backup_classid to struct skbuff Libo Chen
2014-01-03 3:11 ` Libo Chen
[not found] ` <52C62A48.1050604-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-03 5:34 ` David Miller
2014-01-03 5:34 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20140103.003404.1439874071277993396.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-03 6:21 ` John Fastabend
2014-01-03 6:21 ` John Fastabend
[not found] ` <52C656F2.8060803-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-06 8:16 ` Libo Chen
2014-01-06 8:16 ` Libo Chen
2014-01-07 12:54 ` Libo Chen
2014-01-07 12:54 ` Libo Chen [this message]
2014-01-07 12:54 ` Libo Chen
2014-01-07 12:54 ` Libo Chen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-03 3:11 Libo Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CBF8EB.6000803@huawei.com \
--to=clbchenlibo.chen-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dingtianhong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=edumazet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jasowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jhs-jkUAjuhPggJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.