All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: status of block-integrity
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:14:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CCFADB.6080909@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1a9f7wjqr.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

On 01/07/2014 10:43 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
> 
> Hannes> Plus (as hch rightly pointed out) as there is no defined
> Hannes> userland interface the question is why we bother with all the
> Hannes> DIX stuff in the block layer.  
> 
> Because it catches problems in the path between block layer and HBA
> ASIC? FWIW, we find more issues there than we do between initiator and
> target.
> 
But how should it do that exactly?
As there is no user (apart from oracleasm) no-one can attach
protection information to any data, so even the most dedicated admin
cannot exercise this path, let alone find issues here.

> API issues aside, another reason adoption has been slow is that very few
> applications truly care about this stuff. The current approach in which
> data is protected when the I/O is submitted by the filesystem is good
> enough for most things. Saves the filesystem people the trouble of
> dealing with it too.
> 
> In reality there are only a handful of applications that would actually
> benefit from an explicit userland API. Mostly in the database
> department. All the potential consumers of an interface I talked to
> wanted to use aio so that's why we've focused our efforts there.
> 
aio is perfectly fine; all I care is to have _any_ way of feeding
protection information into the kernel.

> Both Darrick and I have been busy with other projects the last little
> while. I'll start looking at this again when I'm done with copy
> offload...
> 
Speaking of which, are there any patches?
Doug Gilbert and I are currently discussing LID4 / ROD Token copy
for sg3_utils and the block layer, so any patches would be very
helpful here.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: status of block-integrity
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:14:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CCFADB.6080909@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1a9f7wjqr.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

On 01/07/2014 10:43 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
> 
> Hannes> Plus (as hch rightly pointed out) as there is no defined
> Hannes> userland interface the question is why we bother with all the
> Hannes> DIX stuff in the block layer.  
> 
> Because it catches problems in the path between block layer and HBA
> ASIC? FWIW, we find more issues there than we do between initiator and
> target.
> 
But how should it do that exactly?
As there is no user (apart from oracleasm) no-one can attach
protection information to any data, so even the most dedicated admin
cannot exercise this path, let alone find issues here.

> API issues aside, another reason adoption has been slow is that very few
> applications truly care about this stuff. The current approach in which
> data is protected when the I/O is submitted by the filesystem is good
> enough for most things. Saves the filesystem people the trouble of
> dealing with it too.
> 
> In reality there are only a handful of applications that would actually
> benefit from an explicit userland API. Mostly in the database
> department. All the potential consumers of an interface I talked to
> wanted to use aio so that's why we've focused our efforts there.
> 
aio is perfectly fine; all I care is to have _any_ way of feeding
protection information into the kernel.

> Both Darrick and I have been busy with other projects the last little
> while. I'll start looking at this again when I'm done with copy
> offload...
> 
Speaking of which, are there any patches?
Doug Gilbert and I are currently discussing LID4 / ROD Token copy
for sg3_utils and the block layer, so any patches would be very
helpful here.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-08  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-22 19:21 status of block-integrity Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-22 20:45 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-12-23 13:35 ` Martin K. Petersen
2013-12-23 13:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-31 19:41   ` berthiaume, wayne
2014-01-07  8:28   ` Ric Wheeler
2014-01-07 13:33     ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-07 13:33       ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-07 23:34       ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-08  0:05         ` James Bottomley
2014-01-08 15:43           ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-03 15:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-03 20:03   ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-07  1:36     ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-01-07  7:17       ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-07  7:17         ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-07 21:43         ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-08  7:14           ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2014-01-08  7:14             ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-08 15:23             ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-09 11:19               ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-09 11:19                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-10  1:49                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-07 15:06       ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CCFADB.6080909@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.