All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ohci-platform: Add support for devicetree instantiation
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:00:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CD7635.8040102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CA603B.3070203@redhat.com>

Hi,

On 01/06/2014 08:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:

<snip>

>> Otherwise you don't know the difference between "no clock
>> provided", "error getting the clock reference" and "clock controller not
>> initialized yet, try again".
>
> I guess of these 3 we really only want to continue on "no clock provided",
> so I think something like this (for both clks and the phy) would be best:
>
>          priv->ahb_clk = devm_clk_get(&dev->dev, "ahb");
>          if (IS_ERR(priv->ahb_clk)) {
>              err = PTR_ERR(priv->ahb_clk);
>              if (err != -EINVAL && err != -ENODATA)
>                  goto err_put_hcd;
>              priv->ahb_clk = NULL; /* No clock provided */
>          }
>
> To clarify -EINVAL will be returned when there is no clock-names, and
> -ENODATA when the specified name is not found in clock-names.

Ok, so I've got this wrong, if there is no clk by that name specified
in dt -ENOENT will be returned. Actually -ENOENT is the only
error clk_get and thus devm_clk_get will ever return.

So it seems that clk_get currently is not properly passing along
probe-deferral. To make things future proof I will add a probe
deferral check to the next version of my patch.

Regards,

Hans

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: Alan Stern
	<stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>,
	Tony Prisk <linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
	Maxime Ripard
	<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ohci-platform: Add support for devicetree instantiation
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:00:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CD7635.8040102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CA603B.3070203-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Hi,

On 01/06/2014 08:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:

<snip>

>> Otherwise you don't know the difference between "no clock
>> provided", "error getting the clock reference" and "clock controller not
>> initialized yet, try again".
>
> I guess of these 3 we really only want to continue on "no clock provided",
> so I think something like this (for both clks and the phy) would be best:
>
>          priv->ahb_clk = devm_clk_get(&dev->dev, "ahb");
>          if (IS_ERR(priv->ahb_clk)) {
>              err = PTR_ERR(priv->ahb_clk);
>              if (err != -EINVAL && err != -ENODATA)
>                  goto err_put_hcd;
>              priv->ahb_clk = NULL; /* No clock provided */
>          }
>
> To clarify -EINVAL will be returned when there is no clock-names, and
> -ENODATA when the specified name is not found in clock-names.

Ok, so I've got this wrong, if there is no clk by that name specified
in dt -ENOENT will be returned. Actually -ENOENT is the only
error clk_get and thus devm_clk_get will ever return.

So it seems that clk_get currently is not properly passing along
probe-deferral. To make things future proof I will add a probe
deferral check to the next version of my patch.

Regards,

Hans

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-08 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-05 23:04 [PATCH 1/2] ohci-platform: Add support for devicetree instantiation Hans de Goede
2014-01-05 23:04 ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-05 23:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] ehci-platform: Add support for clks and phy passed through devicetree Hans de Goede
2014-01-05 23:04   ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-06 15:52   ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-06 15:52     ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-06  7:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] ohci-platform: Add support for devicetree instantiation Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-06  7:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-06  7:50   ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-06  7:50     ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-06 16:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-06 16:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-08 16:00     ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2014-01-08 16:00       ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-06 15:45 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-06 15:45   ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-07 21:01   ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-07 21:01     ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-06 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2014-01-06 15:49   ` Alan Stern
2014-01-07 21:03   ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-07 21:03     ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-07 21:16     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-07 21:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-07 21:26       ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-07 21:26         ` Hans de Goede
2014-01-08 16:59         ` Alan Stern
2014-01-08 16:59           ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CD7635.8040102@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.