Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch

[Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>]

On Thursday 09 January 2014 05:31 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2014 07:38 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 11:06 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 11:22 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> Sekhar,
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 24 December 2013 06:41 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse
>>>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci.
>>>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports:
>>>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines;
>>>>> - only unbanked irqs;
>>>>>
>>>>> See Documentation:
>>>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> This series based on:
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nsekhar/linux-davinci.git/log/?h=v3.14/gpio
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>> - fixed code, changed by mistake; fixed sparse warning 
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>> - minor comments applied, no functional changes
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/18/135
>>>>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/12/366
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>>>>> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>>>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Grygorii Strashko (2):
>>>>>   gpio: davinci: don't create irq_domain in case of unbanked irqs
>>>>>   gpio: davinci: reuse for Keystone SoC
>>>>>
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt      |    4 +-
>>>>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c                        |   82 ++++++++++++++------
>>>>>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>> Have you picked up the $subject series in your queue ?
>>>
>>> Not yet, at least on the new compatible introduction, I need an ack from
>>> DT folks.
>>>
>> I noticed that but the usual 2 weeks period to get ack is over I guess ;-)
>> The DT part is really trivial as well but I let you decide.
> 
> I just realize that Rob's e-mail address bounces. I have added his
> updated address now and hopefully he will see this to provide his ack.
> 
> Rob,
> 
> We need your ack on 2/2 of this series. If you do not have the patch, I
> can forward it to you.
> 
>>
>>> I am happy with the patches though and have tested them as well, In case
>>> I do not get an ack from 2/2 in time, I can at least send 1/2 for
>>> inclusion after my first gpio pull request to ARM-SoC gets pulled.
>>>
>> Would be great to get both of them but if not both at least 1/2.
> 
> I had already sent it with my first pull request. Hmph. Everything
> except 2/2 of tis series should be in linux-next now.
> 
Thanks !!