Re: unmaintained layers

[Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>]

On 01/09/2014 06:20 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
>>> <trevor.woerner@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
>>>> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
>>>> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
>>>> suspected of being, unmaintained?
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity
>>> ? Versus an
>>> opt-in query ?
>>
>> I agree..  see below for mine..
> 
> To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought
> were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this
> way works too.
> 
> Interestingly enough, had I sorted the list on commit activity,
> according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/?s=idle
> meta-realtime hasn't been touched in 10 months which would make me
> suspect it was abandoned.

This approach is a good test of which layer maintainers are paying
attention to list traffic :)

Philip

> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 
>