Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] virtio-net: initial debugfs support, export mergeable rx buffer size

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On 01/13/2014 07:32 AM, Michael Dalton wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Can't we add struct attribute * to netdevice, and pass that in when
>> creating the kobj?
> I like that idea, I think that will work and should be better than
> the alternatives. The actual kobjs for RX queues (struct netdev_rx_queue)
> are allocated and deallocated by calls to net_rx_queue_update_kobjects,
> which resizes RX queue kobjects when the netdev RX queues are resized.
>
> Is this what you had in mind:
> (1) Add a pointer to an attribute group to struct net_device, used for
>     per-netdev rx queue attributes and initialized before the call to
>     register_netdevice().
> (2) Declare an attribute group containing the mergeable_rx_buffer_size
>     attribute in virtio-net, and initialize the per-netdevice group pointer
>     to the address of this group in virtnet_probe before register_netdevice
> (3) In net-sysfs, modify net_rx_queue_update_kobjects
>     (or rx_queue_add_kobject) to call sysfs_create_group on the
>     per-netdev attribute group (if non-NULL), adding the attributes in
>     the group to the RX queue kobject.
>
> That should allow us to have per-RX queue attributes that are
> device-specific. I'm not a sysfs expert, but it seems that rx_queue_ktype
> and rx_queue_sysfs_ops presume that all rx queue sysfs operations are
> performed on attributes of type rx_queue_attribute. That type will need
> to be moved from net-sysfs.c to a header file like netdevice.h so that
> the type can be used in virtio-net when we declare the
> mergeable_rx_buffer_size attribute.

There's a possible issue, rx queue sysfs depends on CONFIG_RPS. So we
probably need a dedicated attribute just for virtio-net.
>
> The last issue is how the rx_queue_attribute 'show' function
> implementation for mergeable_rx_buffer_size will access the appropriate
> per-receive queue EWMA data. The arguments to the show function will be
> the netdev_rx_queue and the attribute itself. We can get to the
> struct net_device from the netdev_rx_queue.  If we extended
> netdev_rx_queue to indicate the queue_index or to store a void *priv_data
> pointer, that would be sufficient to allow us to resolve this issue.
>
> Please let me know if the above sounds good or if you see a better way
> to accomplish this goal. Thanks!
>
> Best,
>
> Mike