All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 07:42:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D40957.2020103@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140113134609.GB31640@localhost>

On 01/13/2014 05:46 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> So, I think
>>> that it is better to get more benchmark results to this patchset for convincing
>>> ourselves. If possible, how about asking Fengguang to run whole set of
>>> his benchmarks before going forward?
>>
>> Cc'ing him.
> 
> My pleasure. Is there a git tree for the patches? Git trees
> are most convenient for running automated tests and bisects.

Here's a branch:

https://github.com/hansendc/linux/tree/slub-reshrink-for-Fengguang-20140113

My patches are not broken out in there, but that's all the code that
needs to get tested.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 07:42:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D40957.2020103@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140113134609.GB31640@localhost>

On 01/13/2014 05:46 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> So, I think
>>> that it is better to get more benchmark results to this patchset for convincing
>>> ourselves. If possible, how about asking Fengguang to run whole set of
>>> his benchmarks before going forward?
>>
>> Cc'ing him.
> 
> My pleasure. Is there a git tree for the patches? Git trees
> are most convenient for running automated tests and bisects.

Here's a branch:

https://github.com/hansendc/linux/tree/slub-reshrink-for-Fengguang-20140113

My patches are not broken out in there, but that's all the code that
needs to get tested.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-13 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-03 18:01 [PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: slab/slub: use page->list consistently instead of page->lru Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: blk-mq: uses page->list incorrectly Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: page->pfmemalloc only used by slab/skb Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: slabs: reset page at free Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: rearrange struct page Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: slub: rearrange 'struct page' fields Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm: slub: abstract out double cmpxchg option Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:02   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: slub: remove 'struct page' alignment restrictions Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:02   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: slub: cleanups after code churn Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 18:02   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-03 22:18 ` [PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on Andrew Morton
2014-01-03 22:18   ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-06  4:32   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-06  4:32     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-10 20:52     ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-10 20:52       ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-10 23:39       ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-10 23:39         ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-10 23:42         ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-10 23:42           ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-11  9:26           ` Pekka Enberg
2014-01-11  9:26             ` Pekka Enberg
2014-01-12  0:55             ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-12  0:55               ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-13  1:44               ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-13  1:44                 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-13  3:36                 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-01-13  3:36                   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-01-13 13:46                   ` Fengguang Wu
2014-01-13 13:46                     ` Fengguang Wu
2014-01-13 15:42                     ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2014-01-13 15:42                       ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-13 17:16                 ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-13 17:16                   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 20:07                   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 20:07                     ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 22:05                     ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 22:05                       ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-16 16:44                       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-16 16:44                         ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-16 17:08                         ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-16 17:08                           ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-16 18:26                           ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-16 18:26                             ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 17:40               ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 17:40                 ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D40957.2020103@sr71.net \
    --to=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.