From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock()
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:41:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D4172E.6030706@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D353C8.4000000@numascale.com>
On 01/12/2014 09:47 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 January 2014 01:10:03 UTC+8, Waiman Long wrote:
> > This patch modifies the queue_write_unlock() function to use the
> > new smp_store_release() function in another pending patch. It also
> > removes the temporary implementation of smp_load_acquire() and
> > smp_store_release() function in qrwlock.c.
> >
> > This patch should only be merged if PeterZ's linux-arch patch patch
> > was merged.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h | 4 +---
> > kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 34
> ----------------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > index 2b9a7b4..4d4bd04 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > @@ -179,9 +179,7 @@ static inline void queue_write_unlock(struct
> qrwlock *lock)
> > /*
> > * Make sure that none of the critical section will be leaked out.
> > */
> > - smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
> > - ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.writer) = 0;
> > - smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> > + smp_store_release(&lock->cnts.writer, 0)
>
> This will fail compilation, so probably needs further testing with
> Peter's load_acquire/store_release barrier patches.
>
Peter,
I found out that the build failure was caused by the fact that the
__native_word() macro (used internally by compiletime_assert_atomic())
allows only a size of 4 or 8 for x86-64. The data type that I used is a
byte. Is there a reason why byte and short are not considered native?
-Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-13 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-13 2:47 [PATCH v8 4/4] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock() Daniel J Blueman
2014-01-13 3:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 16:41 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2014-01-14 2:28 ` Daniel J Blueman
2014-01-14 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-14 15:25 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-14 17:08 ` Matt Turner
2014-01-14 18:01 ` Richard Henderson
2014-01-14 19:09 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-14 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-14 23:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 0:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-15 2:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-15 20:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 23:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <CA+55aFydYLQeBq=4AQQp_4dAnq09ocLmde1LFaXiNAJ=wJzfFA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-16 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-18 10:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-18 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-18 12:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-18 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-18 21:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-19 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-19 8:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-19 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-20 0:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-21 15:02 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-21 15:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 16:16 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-15 3:08 ` Daniel J Blueman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-08 16:59 [PATCH v8 0/4] qrwlock: Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Waiman Long
2014-01-08 16:59 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock() Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D4172E.6030706@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=daniel@numascale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.