From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: timer-sun5i: Switch to sched_clock_register()
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:56:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D96ED6.20508@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D90060.5020104@linaro.org>
On 01/17/14 02:05, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 02:38 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The 32 bit sched_clock interface supports 64 bits since 3.13-rc1.
>> Upgrade to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit
>> registration interface.
>>
>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Cc'in Ingo because this is simple enough to probably just apply to
>> timers/core
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I applied your patch in my tree for 3.15.
>
I was hoping we could remove setup_sched_clock() in 3.14-rc1 timeline,
but if we delay this until 3.15 we'll have to wait another 3 months. Is
there any chance we can get this in for 3.14?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: timer-sun5i: Switch to sched_clock_register()
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:56:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D96ED6.20508@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D90060.5020104@linaro.org>
On 01/17/14 02:05, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 02:38 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The 32 bit sched_clock interface supports 64 bits since 3.13-rc1.
>> Upgrade to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit
>> registration interface.
>>
>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Cc'in Ingo because this is simple enough to probably just apply to
>> timers/core
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I applied your patch in my tree for 3.15.
>
I was hoping we could remove setup_sched_clock() in 3.14-rc1 timeline,
but if we delay this until 3.15 we'll have to wait another 3 months. Is
there any chance we can get this in for 3.14?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-17 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 1:38 [PATCH] clocksource: timer-sun5i: Switch to sched_clock_register() Stephen Boyd
2014-01-17 1:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-17 10:05 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-17 10:05 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-17 17:56 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2014-01-17 17:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-17 18:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-17 18:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-19 12:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-19 12:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-19 12:27 ` [tip:timers/core] clocksource: Timer-sun5i: " tip-bot for Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D96ED6.20508@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.