From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
James Hogan <james.hogan-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
andreas.dilger-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
Greg KH
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
bergwolf-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
oleg.drokin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
jacques-charles.lafoucriere-KCE40YydGKI@public.gmane.org,
jinshan.xiong-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-metag-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: lustre: include: add "__attribute__((packed))" for the related union
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:07:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DBA3D4.3090308@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140118142404.GT7444@mwanda>
On 01/18/2014 10:24 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 06:26:10PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 01/18/2014 06:05 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 05:50:34PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately, not all compilers assumes the structures within a pack
>>>> region also need be packed (e.g. metag), so need add a pack explicitly
>>>> to satisfy all compilers.
>>>>
>>>> The related error (under metag with allmodconfig):
>>>>
>>>> CC [M] drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.o
>>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c: In function 'lov_getstripe':
>>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:630: error: duplicate case value
>>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:630: error: previously used here
>>>>
>>>> And originally, all related code used "__attribute__((packed))", so
>>>> still use it instead of '__packed'.
>>>
>>> Use __packed. Then at least one line will be correct which is better
>>> than nothing.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm... but that will break the 'consistency' (which is not quite good
>> for readers).
>>
>> For me, it will be better to provide another patch to change all
>> "__attribute__((packed))" to "__packed" within this file.
>>
>> What about your ideas?
>>
>
> In the end, it's not something we care about enough to ask you to redo
> the patch. But what I'm saying is that you should prefer kernel style
> over local style. We'll fix the surrounding lines later.
>
OK, thanks, and also thank James and "./scripts/checkpatch.pl" who/which
also mentioned about it to me.
BTW: this patch is related with another patch which is discussing (so I
have cc that patch to you and Greg too): "if we could sure that it is a
compiler's feature issue, we will skip this patch".
Thanks
--
Chen Gang
Open, share and attitude like air, water and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-metag" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
andreas.dilger@intel.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
bergwolf@gmail.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
oleg.drokin@intel.com, jacques-charles.lafoucriere@cea.fr,
jinshan.xiong@intel.com, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: lustre: include: add "__attribute__((packed))" for the related union
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:07:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DBA3D4.3090308@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140118142404.GT7444@mwanda>
On 01/18/2014 10:24 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 06:26:10PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 01/18/2014 06:05 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 05:50:34PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately, not all compilers assumes the structures within a pack
>>>> region also need be packed (e.g. metag), so need add a pack explicitly
>>>> to satisfy all compilers.
>>>>
>>>> The related error (under metag with allmodconfig):
>>>>
>>>> CC [M] drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.o
>>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c: In function 'lov_getstripe':
>>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:630: error: duplicate case value
>>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:630: error: previously used here
>>>>
>>>> And originally, all related code used "__attribute__((packed))", so
>>>> still use it instead of '__packed'.
>>>
>>> Use __packed. Then at least one line will be correct which is better
>>> than nothing.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm... but that will break the 'consistency' (which is not quite good
>> for readers).
>>
>> For me, it will be better to provide another patch to change all
>> "__attribute__((packed))" to "__packed" within this file.
>>
>> What about your ideas?
>>
>
> In the end, it's not something we care about enough to ask you to redo
> the patch. But what I'm saying is that you should prefer kernel style
> over local style. We'll fix the surrounding lines later.
>
OK, thanks, and also thank James and "./scripts/checkpatch.pl" who/which
also mentioned about it to me.
BTW: this patch is related with another patch which is discussing (so I
have cc that patch to you and Greg too): "if we could sure that it is a
compiler's feature issue, we will skip this patch".
Thanks
--
Chen Gang
Open, share and attitude like air, water and life which God blessed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-19 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-18 9:50 [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: lustre: include: add "__attribute__((packed))" for the related union Chen Gang
2014-01-18 9:50 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-18 10:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-18 10:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-18 10:26 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-18 10:26 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-18 14:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-19 10:07 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2014-01-19 10:07 ` Chen Gang
[not found] ` <52DBA3D4.3090308-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-20 11:56 ` James Hogan
2014-01-20 11:56 ` James Hogan
2014-01-20 12:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-20 12:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-20 12:37 ` James Hogan
2014-01-20 12:37 ` James Hogan
2014-01-20 12:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-20 12:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-20 13:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-20 13:38 ` James Hogan
2014-01-20 13:38 ` James Hogan
2014-01-20 21:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-20 21:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-21 10:36 ` James Hogan
2014-01-21 10:36 ` James Hogan
2014-01-25 11:55 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-25 11:55 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-01 13:57 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-01 13:57 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-03 8:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-03 8:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-03 10:03 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-03 10:03 ` Chen Gang
[not found] ` <52EF6965.6040406-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-03 11:35 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-03 11:35 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-03 10:05 ` David Laight
2014-02-03 10:22 ` James Hogan
2014-02-03 10:22 ` James Hogan
2014-02-03 10:30 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-03 10:30 ` Chen Gang
[not found] ` <52EF6DCC.6040807-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-03 10:35 ` David Laight
2014-02-03 10:35 ` David Laight
2014-02-03 11:02 ` James Hogan
2014-02-03 11:02 ` James Hogan
2014-02-03 11:54 ` David Laight
2014-02-03 11:54 ` David Laight
[not found] ` <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6B772B-VkEWCZq2GCInGFn1LkZF6NBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-03 10:25 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-03 10:25 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DBA3D4.3090308@gmail.com \
--to=gang.chen.5i5j-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=andreas.dilger-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bergwolf-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jacques-charles.lafoucriere-KCE40YydGKI@public.gmane.org \
--cc=james.hogan-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jinshan.xiong-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-metag-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.