All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
Cc: mareklindner@neomailbox.ch, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH linux-next] net: batman-adv: use "__packed __aligned(2)" for each structure instead of "__packed(2)" region
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:28:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DD0869.10803@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DB9B39.9090502@meshcoding.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]

Hi Antonio,

On 19/01/14 09:30, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On 19/01/14 02:10, James Hogan wrote:
>> It appears that the following gcc patch adds support for #pragma pack:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg01115.html
>>
>> I gave it a quick spin on metag gcc (which is unfortunately stuck on an old 
>> version) and it seems to fix my simple test case so that #pragma pack(2) 
>> becomes equivalent to __packed __aligned(2) (for sizeof and __alignof__).
>>
> 
> Then I personally think that it is better to fix metag gcc instead of
> changing the kernel.

Indeed it makes sense to patch metag gcc to be safe in the presence of
unportable code like this.

> Actually there are many different spots where "#pragma pack" is used.
> batman-adv is just the only one having compile time checks for structure
> sizes.

Well the only vaguely interesting one I can find outside of drivers is
in fs/udf, and even that seems specific to CD-ROMs and DVDs.

If you care about portability then Chen's patch looks reasonable to me.

Cheers
James


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	mareklindner@neomailbox.ch, sw@simonwunderlich.de,
	b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] net: batman-adv: use "__packed __aligned(2)" for each structure instead of "__packed(2)" region
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:28:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DD0869.10803@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DB9B39.9090502@meshcoding.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]

Hi Antonio,

On 19/01/14 09:30, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On 19/01/14 02:10, James Hogan wrote:
>> It appears that the following gcc patch adds support for #pragma pack:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg01115.html
>>
>> I gave it a quick spin on metag gcc (which is unfortunately stuck on an old 
>> version) and it seems to fix my simple test case so that #pragma pack(2) 
>> becomes equivalent to __packed __aligned(2) (for sizeof and __alignof__).
>>
> 
> Then I personally think that it is better to fix metag gcc instead of
> changing the kernel.

Indeed it makes sense to patch metag gcc to be safe in the presence of
unportable code like this.

> Actually there are many different spots where "#pragma pack" is used.
> batman-adv is just the only one having compile time checks for structure
> sizes.

Well the only vaguely interesting one I can find outside of drivers is
in fs/udf, and even that seems specific to CD-ROMs and DVDs.

If you care about portability then Chen's patch looks reasonable to me.

Cheers
James


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>,
	<sw@simonwunderlich.de>, <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-metag@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] net: batman-adv: use "__packed __aligned(2)" for each structure instead of "__packed(2)" region
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:28:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DD0869.10803@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DB9B39.9090502@meshcoding.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]

Hi Antonio,

On 19/01/14 09:30, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On 19/01/14 02:10, James Hogan wrote:
>> It appears that the following gcc patch adds support for #pragma pack:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg01115.html
>>
>> I gave it a quick spin on metag gcc (which is unfortunately stuck on an old 
>> version) and it seems to fix my simple test case so that #pragma pack(2) 
>> becomes equivalent to __packed __aligned(2) (for sizeof and __alignof__).
>>
> 
> Then I personally think that it is better to fix metag gcc instead of
> changing the kernel.

Indeed it makes sense to patch metag gcc to be safe in the presence of
unportable code like this.

> Actually there are many different spots where "#pragma pack" is used.
> batman-adv is just the only one having compile time checks for structure
> sizes.

Well the only vaguely interesting one I can find outside of drivers is
in fs/udf, and even that seems specific to CD-ROMs and DVDs.

If you care about portability then Chen's patch looks reasonable to me.

Cheers
James


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-20 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-18 11:31 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH linux-next] net: batman-adv: use "__packed __aligned(2)" for each structure instead of "__packed(2)" region Chen Gang
2014-01-18 11:31 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-18 11:31 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-18 13:03 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-18 13:03   ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-18 13:03   ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-19  1:10   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " James Hogan
2014-01-19  1:10     ` James Hogan
2014-01-19  9:30     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-19  9:30       ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-19  9:30       ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-19  9:51       ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Chen Gang
2014-01-19  9:51         ` Chen Gang
2014-01-20 11:28       ` James Hogan [this message]
2014-01-20 11:28         ` James Hogan
2014-01-20 11:28         ` James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52DD0869.10803@imgtec.com \
    --to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=antonio@meshcoding.com \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-metag@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mareklindner@neomailbox.ch \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.