From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] watchdog: orion: Remove unneeded BRIDGE_CAUSE clear
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:49:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E0591E.6030009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140122205213.GW18269@obsidianresearch.com>
On 01/22/2014 09:52 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Clearing BRIDGE_CAUSE will only clear all currently pending upstream
>> IRQs, of course. If WDT IRQ will be re-raised right after that in
>> BRIDGE_CAUSE depends on the actual HW implementation, i.e. we do no
>> clear the causing IRQ itself but just what it raised in BRIDGE_CAUSE.
>
> Which is why it makes no sense to clear it one time at kernel start.
>
> Either you only get new edge triggered interrupts after request_irq
> (sane behavior) or you might sometimes get an old pending edge
> triggered interrupt after request_irq (crazy behavior).
>
> Clearing BRIDGE_CAUSE at kernel start only shortens the racy window it
> doesn't eliminate it.
Actually, I missed that we mask all BRIDGE irqs in
orion_bridge_irq_init. If we now also clear already pending irqs, that
will not raise any old interrupts as long as watchdog clears all
reasons for upstream irqs before requesting a BRIDGE irq.
> In the more familiar level triggered world the driver would go to the
> device and ensure it wasn't asserting an IRQ level and then do the
> request_irq. This guarentees it won't get an interrupt callback.
>
> In a edge triggered world the driver should go to the device an ensure
> that it won't create a new IRQ, then do request_irq - confident that
> there will NEVER be a call to the IRQ handler, under any
> circumstances.
>
> So I think edge triggered interrupts need to ack any possible old edge
> trigger in the cause register before the first unmask - eg in the
> setup callback.
>
>> So, you should also clear WDT's irq in the driver yourself to clear a
>> possible pending upstream BRIDGE_CAUSE.
>
> Which isn't possible - the BRIDGE_CAUSE is owned by the irq driver and
> it must be cleared there, and it must only be cleared after the wdt
> has been stopped so it doesn't set it again.
I should have been more precise here: I meant watchdog driver should
clear all sources of possible upstream interrupts in its _own_
registers.
> Notice that Ezequiel has added an IRQ handler that just calls panic,
> so a spurious interrupt call is VERY VERY BAD.
And I understand that he now clears watchdog's register before
requesting an irq. All that is missing is bridge_irq driver clearing
CAUSE register after masking all irqs, right?
I'll stich a patch for that hopefully tomorrow.
Sebastian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/15] watchdog: orion: Remove unneeded BRIDGE_CAUSE clear
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:49:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E0591E.6030009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140122205213.GW18269@obsidianresearch.com>
On 01/22/2014 09:52 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Clearing BRIDGE_CAUSE will only clear all currently pending upstream
>> IRQs, of course. If WDT IRQ will be re-raised right after that in
>> BRIDGE_CAUSE depends on the actual HW implementation, i.e. we do no
>> clear the causing IRQ itself but just what it raised in BRIDGE_CAUSE.
>
> Which is why it makes no sense to clear it one time at kernel start.
>
> Either you only get new edge triggered interrupts after request_irq
> (sane behavior) or you might sometimes get an old pending edge
> triggered interrupt after request_irq (crazy behavior).
>
> Clearing BRIDGE_CAUSE at kernel start only shortens the racy window it
> doesn't eliminate it.
Actually, I missed that we mask all BRIDGE irqs in
orion_bridge_irq_init. If we now also clear already pending irqs, that
will not raise any old interrupts as long as watchdog clears all
reasons for upstream irqs before requesting a BRIDGE irq.
> In the more familiar level triggered world the driver would go to the
> device and ensure it wasn't asserting an IRQ level and then do the
> request_irq. This guarentees it won't get an interrupt callback.
>
> In a edge triggered world the driver should go to the device an ensure
> that it won't create a new IRQ, then do request_irq - confident that
> there will NEVER be a call to the IRQ handler, under any
> circumstances.
>
> So I think edge triggered interrupts need to ack any possible old edge
> trigger in the cause register before the first unmask - eg in the
> setup callback.
>
>> So, you should also clear WDT's irq in the driver yourself to clear a
>> possible pending upstream BRIDGE_CAUSE.
>
> Which isn't possible - the BRIDGE_CAUSE is owned by the irq driver and
> it must be cleared there, and it must only be cleared after the wdt
> has been stopped so it doesn't set it again.
I should have been more precise here: I meant watchdog driver should
clear all sources of possible upstream interrupts in its _own_
registers.
> Notice that Ezequiel has added an IRQ handler that just calls panic,
> so a spurious interrupt call is VERY VERY BAD.
And I understand that he now clears watchdog's register before
requesting an irq. All that is missing is bridge_irq driver clearing
CAUSE register after masking all irqs, right?
I'll stich a patch for that hopefully tomorrow.
Sebastian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim-IQzOog9fTRqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
Gregory Clement
<gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] watchdog: orion: Remove unneeded BRIDGE_CAUSE clear
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:49:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E0591E.6030009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140122205213.GW18269-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
On 01/22/2014 09:52 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Clearing BRIDGE_CAUSE will only clear all currently pending upstream
>> IRQs, of course. If WDT IRQ will be re-raised right after that in
>> BRIDGE_CAUSE depends on the actual HW implementation, i.e. we do no
>> clear the causing IRQ itself but just what it raised in BRIDGE_CAUSE.
>
> Which is why it makes no sense to clear it one time at kernel start.
>
> Either you only get new edge triggered interrupts after request_irq
> (sane behavior) or you might sometimes get an old pending edge
> triggered interrupt after request_irq (crazy behavior).
>
> Clearing BRIDGE_CAUSE at kernel start only shortens the racy window it
> doesn't eliminate it.
Actually, I missed that we mask all BRIDGE irqs in
orion_bridge_irq_init. If we now also clear already pending irqs, that
will not raise any old interrupts as long as watchdog clears all
reasons for upstream irqs before requesting a BRIDGE irq.
> In the more familiar level triggered world the driver would go to the
> device and ensure it wasn't asserting an IRQ level and then do the
> request_irq. This guarentees it won't get an interrupt callback.
>
> In a edge triggered world the driver should go to the device an ensure
> that it won't create a new IRQ, then do request_irq - confident that
> there will NEVER be a call to the IRQ handler, under any
> circumstances.
>
> So I think edge triggered interrupts need to ack any possible old edge
> trigger in the cause register before the first unmask - eg in the
> setup callback.
>
>> So, you should also clear WDT's irq in the driver yourself to clear a
>> possible pending upstream BRIDGE_CAUSE.
>
> Which isn't possible - the BRIDGE_CAUSE is owned by the irq driver and
> it must be cleared there, and it must only be cleared after the wdt
> has been stopped so it doesn't set it again.
I should have been more precise here: I meant watchdog driver should
clear all sources of possible upstream interrupts in its _own_
registers.
> Notice that Ezequiel has added an IRQ handler that just calls panic,
> so a spurious interrupt call is VERY VERY BAD.
And I understand that he now clears watchdog's register before
requesting an irq. All that is missing is bridge_irq driver clearing
CAUSE register after masking all irqs, right?
I'll stich a patch for that hopefully tomorrow.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-22 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 192+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-21 9:12 [PATCH v2 00/15] Armada 370/XP watchdog support Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] ARM: Introduce atomic MMIO modify Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 9:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 9:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 10:46 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 10:46 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 10:46 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] clocksource: orion: Use atomic access for shared registers Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 9:58 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 9:58 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 9:58 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 10:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 10:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 10:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 11:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 11:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 11:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 9:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-21 9:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-21 9:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-21 10:53 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 10:53 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 10:53 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] watchdog: " Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:19 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-01-21 9:19 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-01-21 9:19 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-01-21 9:42 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:42 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:42 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 9:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 9:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 10:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 10:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 10:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] watchdog: orion: Handle IRQ Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] watchdog: orion: Make RSTOUT register a separate resource Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 23:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-21 23:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-21 23:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 9:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 9:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 9:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 16:21 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 16:21 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 16:21 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 18:01 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 18:01 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 18:01 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 18:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 18:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 18:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 18:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 18:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 18:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] watchdog: orion: Remove unneeded BRIDGE_CAUSE clear Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 23:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-21 23:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-21 23:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 16:49 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 16:49 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 16:49 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 17:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 17:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 17:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 17:45 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 17:45 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 17:45 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 18:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 18:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 18:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 20:31 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-22 20:31 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-22 20:31 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-22 20:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 20:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 20:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 22:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 22:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 22:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 22:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 22:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 22:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-22 22:56 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 22:56 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 22:56 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 0:03 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 0:03 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 0:03 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 0:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-23 0:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-23 0:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-23 0:35 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 0:35 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 0:35 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 12:04 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 12:04 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 12:04 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-22 23:49 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2014-01-22 23:49 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-22 23:49 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 11:10 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 11:10 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 11:10 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 11:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 11:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 11:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-23 21:15 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 21:15 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-23 21:15 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] watchdog: orion: Introduce an orion_watchdog device structure Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] watchdog: orion: Introduce per-compatible of_device_id data Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] watchdog: orion: Add per-compatible clock initialization Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-01-21 9:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-01-21 9:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-01-21 9:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] watchdog: orion: Add per-compatible watchdog start implementation Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] watchdog: orion: Add support for Armada 370 and Armada XP SoC Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] ARM: mvebu: Enable Armada 370/XP watchdog in the devicetree Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] ARM: kirkwood: Add RSTOUT 'reg' entry to devicetree Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] watchdog: orion: Allow to build on any Orion platform Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:41 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 9:41 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 9:41 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 9:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 9:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 9:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 10:04 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 10:04 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 10:04 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 11:06 ` Removing PLAT_ORION dependency from ARCH_MVEBU (Was Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] watchdog: orion: Allow to build on any Orion platform) Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 11:06 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 11:06 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 11:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 11:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 11:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-21 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] ARM: mvebu: Enable watchdog support in defconfig Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 9:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-21 12:47 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-21 12:47 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-21 12:47 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-21 12:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 12:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 12:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-21 12:57 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-21 12:57 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-21 12:57 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E0591E.6030009@gmail.com \
--to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.