From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com,
michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it,
dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it,
insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com,
jkacur@redhat.com, harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, bruce.ashfield@windriver.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rob@landley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Add sched_dl documentation
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:52:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E6568F.9040802@unitn.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127124011.GA16809@austad.us>
On 01/27/2014 01:40 PM, Henrik Austad wrote:
[...]
>>> Current runtime: time spent running _this_ period? or is _remaining_
>>> runtime this period? I get the feeling it's the latter.
>>>
>>> So, roughly, it is the ration
>>>
>>> remaining_runtime / relative_time_to_deadline
>>>
>>> which needs to be greater than the assigned CPU bandwidth, and if so, the
>>> budget should be replensihed?
>>>
>>> Shouldn't there be something about not refilling the budget before a new
>>> period has started?
>> Uh... Maybe the description above can be improved :)
>> Do you think that using "remaining runtime" instead of "current runtime"
>> would help? If yes, I'll make this change.
>
> Yes, in my vocabularly, "remaining" != "current" :), so changing to
> 'remaining runtime' would be nice.
Ok; I'll make this change.
>> Also, I see that some of your questions are answered by some items below...
>
> Yes, but I left the comments to indicate that the order was a bit
> confusing.
>
>> Do you think that changing the order of the items in the presentation would
>> improve the readability? If you suggest a better ordering, I'll try to
>> rewrite the algorithm's description according to it.
>
> Could be, at least the ratio-caclulation was a bit confusing until I'd read
> the entire section.
>
> My preferred order (I've just cut'n'pased from the original email here)
>
> + - The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
> + a "current runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
BTW, maybe some of the confusion can be avoided by explaining what the
"remaining runtime" is here... Something like:
- The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
a "current runtime" (representing the amount of execution time that
the task can use before the scheduling deadline). These two parameters
are initially set to 0;
Can something like this help? If yes, I'll update the document.
[...]
> + - When a SCHED_DEADLINE task wakes up (becomes ready for execution),
> + the scheduler checks if
> +
> + current runtime runtime
> + ---------------------------------- > ----------------
> + scheduling deadline - current time period
> +
> + then, if the scheduling deadline is smaller than the current time, or
> + this condition is verified, the scheduling deadline and the
> + current budget are re-initialised as
> +
> + scheduling deadline = current time + deadline
> + current runtime = runtime
> +
> + otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
> + left unchanged;
> +
>
> Emphasis on -my- preferred order. :)
Ok; let's see what other people think, and then we decide the items'
order.
> Either way, I'm quite happy with this documentation-update, this is just
> nitpick :)
Ok, good.
Thanks,
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-27 11:20 [PATCH] sched/deadline: Add sched_dl documentation Juri Lelli
2014-01-27 11:23 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-27 11:53 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-27 12:30 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-27 12:40 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-27 12:52 ` Luca Abeni [this message]
2014-01-27 15:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-27 16:56 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-27 17:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-27 22:29 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-28 10:03 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-28 19:22 ` [tip:sched/numa] " tip-bot for Dario Faggioli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-20 10:40 [PATCH] " Juri Lelli
2014-01-20 11:24 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-20 12:15 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-20 13:16 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 13:39 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 10:20 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-21 11:35 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 12:11 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-21 12:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 12:50 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 14:38 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-21 16:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-22 13:03 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-22 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-24 10:08 ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2014-01-28 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 18:22 ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2014-01-21 10:21 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 12:25 ` Luca Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E6568F.9040802@unitn.it \
--to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=hgu1972@gmail.com \
--cc=insop.song@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=liming.wang@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.