From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: divider: fix rate calculation for fractional rates
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:40:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E78930.8080607@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140128103253.GD15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 2014-01-28 12:32, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> Why I'm asking this is that for me (and probably for others also if
>> you've seen it used in the kernel code) it feels natural to have code like:
>>
>> rate = clk_round_rate(clk, rate);
>>
>> /* Verify the rounded rate here to see it's ok for the IP etc */
>>
>> /* The rate is ok, so set it */
>> clk_set_rate(clk, rate);
>
> If you want to do something with the rounded rate, then that's fine,
> you have a reason to do it this way. However, what I was referring to
> are drivers which literally do this:
>
> clk_set_rate(clk, clk_round_rate(clk, rate));
Thanks for clarification. Agreed, that's pointless. I gave the sequence
in the patch description just as an example for the sake of discussion
about the bug.
I didn't realize people actually do that in real code =).
Tomi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140128/97c9c93c/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Kristo, Tero" <t-kristo@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: divider: fix rate calculation for fractional rates
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:40:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E78930.8080607@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140128103253.GD15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 879 bytes --]
On 2014-01-28 12:32, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> Why I'm asking this is that for me (and probably for others also if
>> you've seen it used in the kernel code) it feels natural to have code like:
>>
>> rate = clk_round_rate(clk, rate);
>>
>> /* Verify the rounded rate here to see it's ok for the IP etc */
>>
>> /* The rate is ok, so set it */
>> clk_set_rate(clk, rate);
>
> If you want to do something with the rounded rate, then that's fine,
> you have a reason to do it this way. However, what I was referring to
> are drivers which literally do this:
>
> clk_set_rate(clk, clk_round_rate(clk, rate));
Thanks for clarification. Agreed, that's pointless. I gave the sequence
in the patch description just as an example for the sake of discussion
about the bug.
I didn't realize people actually do that in real code =).
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 11:06 [PATCH] clk: divider: fix rate calculation for fractional rates Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-06 11:06 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-06 11:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-06 11:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-06 11:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-06 11:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-06 16:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-06 16:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-28 8:45 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28 8:45 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28 10:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-28 10:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-28 10:40 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2014-01-28 10:40 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-11 14:18 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-11 14:18 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E78930.8080607@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.