All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:49:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E7EDC4.3000102@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sis810dl.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 14-01-28 12:28 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
> 
>> Commit b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f ("powerpc/thp: Fix
>> crash on mremap") added a "typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;"
>> which on gcc 4.5.2 (and possibly other versions) causes many of:
>>
>> include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76:3: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t'
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563:25: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here
>> In file included from include/linux/mutex.h:15:0,
>>                  from include/linux/notifier.h:13,
>>                  from include/linux/pm_qos.h:8,
>>                  from include/linux/netdevice.h:28,
>>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h:20,
>>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debug.c:17:
>>
>> It appears that somewhere between gcc 4.5.2 and 4.6.3 this
>> redefinition restriction was lifted.  Using the proper header
>> from within !ASSEMBLY seems to fix it up in an acceptable way.
>>
>> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>
> 
> 
> http://mid.gmane.org/1389939036.3000.7.camel@ThinkPad-T5421.cn.ibm.com
> 
> This was posted earlier.

I see.  Well I guess Ben didn't use it since it is the same as the
temporary not-signed-off-by hack patch I posted earlier as well.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/584

I believe what I've posted here below to be the proper fix.

Paul.
--


> 
> 
> 
>> [ Note that b3084f4db3 isn't mainline yet, it is currently in
>>   benh/powerpc.git #merge -- but is headed there soon via:
>>              https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/599           ]
>>
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> index d27960c89a71..3b638411646a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@
>>
>>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * This is the default implementation of various PTE accessors, it's
>>   * used in all cases except Book3S with 64K pages where we have a
>> @@ -560,7 +562,6 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>  			    pmd_t *pmdp);
>>
>>  #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
>> -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
>>  static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
>>  					 spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
>>  {
>> -- 
>> 1.8.5.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-28 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-28 16:16 [PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-28 17:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-28 17:49   ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2014-01-28 18:49     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-28 19:07       ` Paul Gortmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52E7EDC4.3000102@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.