From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:19:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ppnc0wn1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E7EDC4.3000102@windriver.com>
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
> On 14-01-28 12:28 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
>>
>>> Commit b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f ("powerpc/thp: Fix
>>> crash on mremap") added a "typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;"
>>> which on gcc 4.5.2 (and possibly other versions) causes many of:
>>>
>>> include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76:3: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t'
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563:25: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here
>>> In file included from include/linux/mutex.h:15:0,
>>> from include/linux/notifier.h:13,
>>> from include/linux/pm_qos.h:8,
>>> from include/linux/netdevice.h:28,
>>> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h:20,
>>> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debug.c:17:
>>>
>>> It appears that somewhere between gcc 4.5.2 and 4.6.3 this
>>> redefinition restriction was lifted. Using the proper header
>>> from within !ASSEMBLY seems to fix it up in an acceptable way.
>>>
>>> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>
>>
>> http://mid.gmane.org/1389939036.3000.7.camel@ThinkPad-T5421.cn.ibm.com
>>
>> This was posted earlier.
>
> I see. Well I guess Ben didn't use it since it is the same as the
> temporary not-signed-off-by hack patch I posted earlier as well.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/584
>
> I believe what I've posted here below to be the proper fix.
I had another variant which needed this
http://mid.gmane.org/1388999012-14424-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
BTW I had added the above struct spinlock; patch as the backport to
stable 3.13 series. So if we are picking another one, we may need to
update stable also
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 16:16 [PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-28 17:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-28 17:49 ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-28 18:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2014-01-28 19:07 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ppnc0wn1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.