From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org mailing list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:03:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F09EC0.60201@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF6669B4-EF1A-44BD-9034-8824EFD94B5B@suse.de>
On 01/13/2014 02:44 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 10.01.2014, at 08:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
>
>> When write to MMIO happens and there is an ioeventfd for that and
>> is handled successfully, ioeventfd_write() returns 0 (success) and
>> kvmppc_handle_store() returns EMULATE_DONE. Then kvmppc_emulate_mmio()
>> converts EMULATE_DONE to RESUME_GUEST_NV and this broke from the loop.
>>
>> This adds handling of RESUME_GUEST_NV in kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv().
>>
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>
>> This definitely needs a better commit message. Please, help.
>> ps. it seems like ioeventfd never worked on ppc64. hm.
>>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> index 072287f..24f363f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu->arch.fault_dar, vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr);
>> srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
>> }
>> - } while (r = RESUME_GUEST);
>> + } while ((r = RESUME_GUEST_NV) || (r = RESUME_GUEST));
>
> How about
>
> while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST));
Rather "while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST) && (r > 0));" and still not obvious
that this is really better.
Paul agrees with the original patch (and made a better commit message for
our internal tree) but I just cannot make him reply in this thread, keep
constantly asking him but to no avail :)
> That should cover all RESUME_GUEST_XXX cases just fine. Apart from that
> I agree that we should check for ! FLAG_HOST bit rather than the actual
> RESUME_GUEST value in all case where we check for it (read: please
> update all places).
There are 3 places remotely similar to this and none of them requires a fix
like above.
--
Alexey
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org mailing list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:03:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F09EC0.60201@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF6669B4-EF1A-44BD-9034-8824EFD94B5B@suse.de>
On 01/13/2014 02:44 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 10.01.2014, at 08:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
>
>> When write to MMIO happens and there is an ioeventfd for that and
>> is handled successfully, ioeventfd_write() returns 0 (success) and
>> kvmppc_handle_store() returns EMULATE_DONE. Then kvmppc_emulate_mmio()
>> converts EMULATE_DONE to RESUME_GUEST_NV and this broke from the loop.
>>
>> This adds handling of RESUME_GUEST_NV in kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv().
>>
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>
>> This definitely needs a better commit message. Please, help.
>> ps. it seems like ioeventfd never worked on ppc64. hm.
>>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> index 072287f..24f363f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu->arch.fault_dar, vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr);
>> srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
>> }
>> - } while (r == RESUME_GUEST);
>> + } while ((r == RESUME_GUEST_NV) || (r == RESUME_GUEST));
>
> How about
>
> while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST));
Rather "while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST) && (r > 0));" and still not obvious
that this is really better.
Paul agrees with the original patch (and made a better commit message for
our internal tree) but I just cannot make him reply in this thread, keep
constantly asking him but to no avail :)
> That should cover all RESUME_GUEST_XXX cases just fine. Apart from that
> I agree that we should check for ! FLAG_HOST bit rather than the actual
> RESUME_GUEST value in all case where we check for it (read: please
> update all places).
There are 3 places remotely similar to this and none of them requires a fix
like above.
--
Alexey
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org mailing list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:03:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F09EC0.60201@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF6669B4-EF1A-44BD-9034-8824EFD94B5B@suse.de>
On 01/13/2014 02:44 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 10.01.2014, at 08:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
>
>> When write to MMIO happens and there is an ioeventfd for that and
>> is handled successfully, ioeventfd_write() returns 0 (success) and
>> kvmppc_handle_store() returns EMULATE_DONE. Then kvmppc_emulate_mmio()
>> converts EMULATE_DONE to RESUME_GUEST_NV and this broke from the loop.
>>
>> This adds handling of RESUME_GUEST_NV in kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv().
>>
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>
>> This definitely needs a better commit message. Please, help.
>> ps. it seems like ioeventfd never worked on ppc64. hm.
>>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> index 072287f..24f363f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu->arch.fault_dar, vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr);
>> srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
>> }
>> - } while (r == RESUME_GUEST);
>> + } while ((r == RESUME_GUEST_NV) || (r == RESUME_GUEST));
>
> How about
>
> while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST));
Rather "while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST) && (r > 0));" and still not obvious
that this is really better.
Paul agrees with the original patch (and made a better commit message for
our internal tree) but I just cannot make him reply in this thread, keep
constantly asking him but to no avail :)
> That should cover all RESUME_GUEST_XXX cases just fine. Apart from that
> I agree that we should check for ! FLAG_HOST bit rather than the actual
> RESUME_GUEST value in all case where we check for it (read: please
> update all places).
There are 3 places remotely similar to this and none of them requires a fix
like above.
--
Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 7:21 [PATCH] PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-01-10 7:21 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-01-10 7:21 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-01-12 15:44 ` Alexander Graf
2014-01-12 15:44 ` Alexander Graf
2014-01-12 15:44 ` Alexander Graf
2014-02-04 8:03 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2014-02-04 8:03 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-02-04 8:03 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-02-04 8:09 ` Alexander Graf
2014-02-04 8:09 ` Alexander Graf
2014-02-04 8:09 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F09EC0.60201@ozlabs.ru \
--to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.