All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	thomas.ab@samsung.com,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Add support for 'boost' mode OPP
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:51:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F11AA5.6060200@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuA9aimVcxwKEQnSNpsEhZ7Rf-74+r8FOz09EpAZcoVEdi6GA@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/04/2014 09:59 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
>> On 02/04/2014 03:41 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Commit 6f19efc0 ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") adds
>>> support for CPU boost mode. This patch adds support for finding available
>>> boost OPPs from device tree and marking them as usable in boost mode.
>>>
>>> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Why is a cpufreq feature being pushed on to OPP library? you can very
>> well have a property boot-frequencies = < a b c > and be done with the
>> job.
> 
> The boost-opp was not limited to be a cpu/cpufreq only feature. Any
> device (such as a bus) which has OPPs and if it can support optional
> boost OPPs, can utilize this feature. The boost OPPs also require a
> voltage to be associated with the frequency and hence the binding
> boost-frequencies would not be suffice. The code changes in this patch
> also do not have anything that is cpufreq specific.
> 
if we have
operating-points = < Fa Va
	Fb Vb
	Fc Vc
	Fd Vd
	>;
boost-frequencies = <Fc Fd>;
you can easily pick up the voltages from the table.

The point being - there does not seem to be a need to modify the
existing definitions to introduce new OPP definitions.

a way to flip this over is to consider iMX6(see
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.) where OPP tuple <Fd Vd> can only be
enabled *iff* efuse register x has bit y set.

Would we want to introduce efuse offsets into OPP definitions? into
something like additional field definition 'efuse_controlled'?


>>
>> I agree with Rob's comment that this is something we have to discuss
>> in wider "add features to an OPP" discussion[1].
> 
> Okay. I have read through the discussion in [1]. Thanks for the link.
> Assuming that the current OPP tuple format will not change, I do not
> feel the code changes in this patch will be hinder the outcome of the
> discussion in [1].

The context of that discussion is to consider what is the data form we
consider OPP as? should we consider OPP as a data that is extensible
(as in phandle with properties that we add on) OR should we consider
key, value pair which provides a key (frequency) into another table
for other data (like efuse bit map, boost set etc..).

Both approaches I mentioned will work, and will take additional code
to make it happen. But having custom properties like this limits
extensibility - that is not scalable for other property definitions
we'd like to make in the future.

> 
> Regards,
> Thomas.
> 
>>
>>
>> [1] http://marc.info/?t=139108946400001&r=1&w=2
>>
>>>  drivers/base/power/opp.c |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> index 2553867..de4d52d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp {
>>>       struct list_head node;
>>>
>>>       bool available;
>>> +     bool boost;
>>>       unsigned long rate;
>>>       unsigned long u_volt;
>>>
>>> @@ -380,10 +381,12 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(struct device *dev,
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
>>>
>>>  /**
>>> - * dev_pm_opp_add()  - Add an OPP table from a table definitions
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_add_flags()  - Add an OPP to device OPP list with flags
>>>   * @dev:     device for which we do this operation
>>>   * @freq:    Frequency in Hz for this OPP
>>>   * @u_volt:  Voltage in uVolts for this OPP
>>> + * @available:       initial availability of the OPP with adding it to the list.
>>> + * @boost:   availability of this opp in controller's boost operating mode.
>>>   *
>>>   * This function adds an opp definition to the opp list and returns status.
>>>   * The opp is made available by default and it can be controlled using
>>> @@ -395,7 +398,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
>>>   * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
>>>   * mutex cannot be locked.
>>>   */
>>> -int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>> +static int dev_pm_opp_add_flags(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
>>> +                     unsigned long u_volt, bool available, bool boost)
>>>  {
>>>       struct device_opp *dev_opp = NULL;
>>>       struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *new_opp;
>>> @@ -441,7 +445,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>>       new_opp->dev_opp = dev_opp;
>>>       new_opp->rate = freq;
>>>       new_opp->u_volt = u_volt;
>>> -     new_opp->available = true;
>>> +     new_opp->available = available;
>>> +     new_opp->boost = boost;
>>>
>>>       /* Insert new OPP in order of increasing frequency */
>>>       head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
>>> @@ -462,6 +467,27 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>>       srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
>>>       return 0;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_add()  - Add an OPP table from a table definitions
>>> + * @dev:     device for which we do this operation
>>> + * @freq:    Frequency in Hz for this OPP
>>> + * @u_volt:  Voltage in uVolts for this OPP
>>> + *
>>> + * This function adds an opp definition to the opp list and returns status.
>>> + * The opp is made available by default and it can be controlled using
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_enable/disable functions.
>>> + *
>>> + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected.
>>> + * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
>>> + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
>>> + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
>>> + * mutex cannot be locked.
>>> + */
>>> +int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>> +{
>>> +     return dev_pm_opp_add_flags(dev, freq, u_volt, true, false);
>>> +}
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_add);
>>>
>>>  /**
>>> @@ -651,7 +677,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
>>>
>>>       list_for_each_entry(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
>>>               if (opp->available) {
>>> -                     freq_table[i].driver_data = i;
>>> +                     freq_table[i].driver_data =
>>> +                             opp->boost ? CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ : i;
>>>                       freq_table[i].frequency = opp->rate / 1000;
>>>                       i++;
>>>               }
>>> @@ -701,19 +728,14 @@ struct srcu_notifier_head *dev_pm_opp_get_notifier(struct device *dev)
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> -/**
>>> - * of_init_opp_table() - Initialize opp table from device tree
>>> - * @dev:     device pointer used to lookup device OPPs.
>>> - *
>>> - * Register the initial OPP table with the OPP library for given device.
>>> - */
>>> -int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>> +static int of_parse_opp_table(struct device *dev, const char *prop_name,
>>> +                                     bool boost)
>>>  {
>>>       const struct property *prop;
>>>       const __be32 *val;
>>>       int nr;
>>>
>>> -     prop = of_find_property(dev->of_node, "operating-points", NULL);
>>> +     prop = of_find_property(dev->of_node, prop_name, NULL);
>>>       if (!prop)
>>>               return -ENODEV;
>>>       if (!prop->value)
>>> @@ -734,7 +756,7 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>>               unsigned long freq = be32_to_cpup(val++) * 1000;
>>>               unsigned long volt = be32_to_cpup(val++);
>>>
>>> -             if (dev_pm_opp_add(dev, freq, volt)) {
>>> +             if (dev_pm_opp_add_flags(dev, freq, volt, true, boost)) {
>>>                       dev_warn(dev, "%s: Failed to add OPP %ld\n",
>>>                                __func__, freq);
>>>                       continue;
>>> @@ -744,5 +766,26 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>>
>>>       return 0;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * of_init_opp_table() - Initialize opp table from device tree
>>> + * @dev:     device pointer used to lookup device OPPs.
>>> + *
>>> + * Register the initial OPP table with the OPP library for given device.
>>> + * Additional "boost" operating points of the controller, if any, are
>>> + * specified with "boost-opp" property.
>>> + */
>>> +int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +     int ret;
>>> +
>>> +     ret = of_parse_opp_table(dev, "operating-points", false);
>>> +     if (!ret) {
>>> +             ret = of_parse_opp_table(dev, "boost-opp", true);
>>> +             if (ret == -ENODEV)
>>> +                     ret = 0;
>>> +     }
>>> +     return ret;
>>> +}
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_init_opp_table);
>>>  #endif
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Nishanth Menon


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Add support for 'boost' mode OPP
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:51:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F11AA5.6060200@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuA9aimVcxwKEQnSNpsEhZ7Rf-74+r8FOz09EpAZcoVEdi6GA@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/04/2014 09:59 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
>> On 02/04/2014 03:41 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Commit 6f19efc0 ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") adds
>>> support for CPU boost mode. This patch adds support for finding available
>>> boost OPPs from device tree and marking them as usable in boost mode.
>>>
>>> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Why is a cpufreq feature being pushed on to OPP library? you can very
>> well have a property boot-frequencies = < a b c > and be done with the
>> job.
> 
> The boost-opp was not limited to be a cpu/cpufreq only feature. Any
> device (such as a bus) which has OPPs and if it can support optional
> boost OPPs, can utilize this feature. The boost OPPs also require a
> voltage to be associated with the frequency and hence the binding
> boost-frequencies would not be suffice. The code changes in this patch
> also do not have anything that is cpufreq specific.
> 
if we have
operating-points = < Fa Va
	Fb Vb
	Fc Vc
	Fd Vd
	>;
boost-frequencies = <Fc Fd>;
you can easily pick up the voltages from the table.

The point being - there does not seem to be a need to modify the
existing definitions to introduce new OPP definitions.

a way to flip this over is to consider iMX6(see
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.) where OPP tuple <Fd Vd> can only be
enabled *iff* efuse register x has bit y set.

Would we want to introduce efuse offsets into OPP definitions? into
something like additional field definition 'efuse_controlled'?


>>
>> I agree with Rob's comment that this is something we have to discuss
>> in wider "add features to an OPP" discussion[1].
> 
> Okay. I have read through the discussion in [1]. Thanks for the link.
> Assuming that the current OPP tuple format will not change, I do not
> feel the code changes in this patch will be hinder the outcome of the
> discussion in [1].

The context of that discussion is to consider what is the data form we
consider OPP as? should we consider OPP as a data that is extensible
(as in phandle with properties that we add on) OR should we consider
key, value pair which provides a key (frequency) into another table
for other data (like efuse bit map, boost set etc..).

Both approaches I mentioned will work, and will take additional code
to make it happen. But having custom properties like this limits
extensibility - that is not scalable for other property definitions
we'd like to make in the future.

> 
> Regards,
> Thomas.
> 
>>
>>
>> [1] http://marc.info/?t=139108946400001&r=1&w=2
>>
>>>  drivers/base/power/opp.c |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> index 2553867..de4d52d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp {
>>>       struct list_head node;
>>>
>>>       bool available;
>>> +     bool boost;
>>>       unsigned long rate;
>>>       unsigned long u_volt;
>>>
>>> @@ -380,10 +381,12 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(struct device *dev,
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
>>>
>>>  /**
>>> - * dev_pm_opp_add()  - Add an OPP table from a table definitions
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_add_flags()  - Add an OPP to device OPP list with flags
>>>   * @dev:     device for which we do this operation
>>>   * @freq:    Frequency in Hz for this OPP
>>>   * @u_volt:  Voltage in uVolts for this OPP
>>> + * @available:       initial availability of the OPP with adding it to the list.
>>> + * @boost:   availability of this opp in controller's boost operating mode.
>>>   *
>>>   * This function adds an opp definition to the opp list and returns status.
>>>   * The opp is made available by default and it can be controlled using
>>> @@ -395,7 +398,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
>>>   * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
>>>   * mutex cannot be locked.
>>>   */
>>> -int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>> +static int dev_pm_opp_add_flags(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
>>> +                     unsigned long u_volt, bool available, bool boost)
>>>  {
>>>       struct device_opp *dev_opp = NULL;
>>>       struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *new_opp;
>>> @@ -441,7 +445,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>>       new_opp->dev_opp = dev_opp;
>>>       new_opp->rate = freq;
>>>       new_opp->u_volt = u_volt;
>>> -     new_opp->available = true;
>>> +     new_opp->available = available;
>>> +     new_opp->boost = boost;
>>>
>>>       /* Insert new OPP in order of increasing frequency */
>>>       head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
>>> @@ -462,6 +467,27 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>>       srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
>>>       return 0;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_add()  - Add an OPP table from a table definitions
>>> + * @dev:     device for which we do this operation
>>> + * @freq:    Frequency in Hz for this OPP
>>> + * @u_volt:  Voltage in uVolts for this OPP
>>> + *
>>> + * This function adds an opp definition to the opp list and returns status.
>>> + * The opp is made available by default and it can be controlled using
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_enable/disable functions.
>>> + *
>>> + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected.
>>> + * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
>>> + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
>>> + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
>>> + * mutex cannot be locked.
>>> + */
>>> +int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>> +{
>>> +     return dev_pm_opp_add_flags(dev, freq, u_volt, true, false);
>>> +}
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_add);
>>>
>>>  /**
>>> @@ -651,7 +677,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
>>>
>>>       list_for_each_entry(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
>>>               if (opp->available) {
>>> -                     freq_table[i].driver_data = i;
>>> +                     freq_table[i].driver_data =
>>> +                             opp->boost ? CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ : i;
>>>                       freq_table[i].frequency = opp->rate / 1000;
>>>                       i++;
>>>               }
>>> @@ -701,19 +728,14 @@ struct srcu_notifier_head *dev_pm_opp_get_notifier(struct device *dev)
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> -/**
>>> - * of_init_opp_table() - Initialize opp table from device tree
>>> - * @dev:     device pointer used to lookup device OPPs.
>>> - *
>>> - * Register the initial OPP table with the OPP library for given device.
>>> - */
>>> -int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>> +static int of_parse_opp_table(struct device *dev, const char *prop_name,
>>> +                                     bool boost)
>>>  {
>>>       const struct property *prop;
>>>       const __be32 *val;
>>>       int nr;
>>>
>>> -     prop = of_find_property(dev->of_node, "operating-points", NULL);
>>> +     prop = of_find_property(dev->of_node, prop_name, NULL);
>>>       if (!prop)
>>>               return -ENODEV;
>>>       if (!prop->value)
>>> @@ -734,7 +756,7 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>>               unsigned long freq = be32_to_cpup(val++) * 1000;
>>>               unsigned long volt = be32_to_cpup(val++);
>>>
>>> -             if (dev_pm_opp_add(dev, freq, volt)) {
>>> +             if (dev_pm_opp_add_flags(dev, freq, volt, true, boost)) {
>>>                       dev_warn(dev, "%s: Failed to add OPP %ld\n",
>>>                                __func__, freq);
>>>                       continue;
>>> @@ -744,5 +766,26 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>>
>>>       return 0;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * of_init_opp_table() - Initialize opp table from device tree
>>> + * @dev:     device pointer used to lookup device OPPs.
>>> + *
>>> + * Register the initial OPP table with the OPP library for given device.
>>> + * Additional "boost" operating points of the controller, if any, are
>>> + * specified with "boost-opp" property.
>>> + */
>>> +int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +     int ret;
>>> +
>>> +     ret = of_parse_opp_table(dev, "operating-points", false);
>>> +     if (!ret) {
>>> +             ret = of_parse_opp_table(dev, "boost-opp", true);
>>> +             if (ret == -ENODEV)
>>> +                     ret = 0;
>>> +     }
>>> +     return ret;
>>> +}
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_init_opp_table);
>>>  #endif
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Nishanth Menon


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-04 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-04  9:41 [PATCH 0/2] Add device tree based lookup of boost mode OPPs Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04  9:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04  9:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Add support for 'boost' mode OPP Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04  9:41   ` Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04 15:15   ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-04 15:15     ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-04 15:59     ` Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04 15:59       ` Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04 16:51       ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2014-02-04 16:51         ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-04  9:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: devicetree: Add boost-opp binding to list boost mode OPPs Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04  9:41   ` Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04 14:02   ` Rob Herring
2014-02-04 14:02     ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52F11AA5.6060200@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.