From: "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add 1074K CPU support explicitly.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:30:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F50A18.7020008@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207130737.GG19285@linux-mips.org>
On 02/07/2014 07:07 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:03:50PM -0600, Steven J. Hill wrote:
>
>> The 1074K is a multiprocessing coherent processing system (CPS) based
>> on modified 74K cores. This patch makes the 1074K an actual unique
>> CPU type, instead of a 74K derivative, which it is not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
>
> I've also come to the conclusion that this seems to be the right
> thing. I'm still undecided on the urgency, 3.14 or later? For now I'm
> going to drop this into the 3.15 queue.
>
It is kind of urgent, so please get it into 3.14 is possible. Thanks.
Steve
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add 1074K CPU support explicitly.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:30:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F50A18.7020008@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140207163016.fRC2EQXTuunpOcvYC9DVRl3Mfla-HLG5pL8RFmJgsH4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207130737.GG19285@linux-mips.org>
On 02/07/2014 07:07 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:03:50PM -0600, Steven J. Hill wrote:
>
>> The 1074K is a multiprocessing coherent processing system (CPS) based
>> on modified 74K cores. This patch makes the 1074K an actual unique
>> CPU type, instead of a 74K derivative, which it is not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
>
> I've also come to the conclusion that this seems to be the right
> thing. I'm still undecided on the urgency, 3.14 or later? For now I'm
> going to drop this into the 3.15 queue.
>
It is kind of urgent, so please get it into 3.14 is possible. Thanks.
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 21:03 [PATCH] MIPS: Add 1074K CPU support explicitly Steven J. Hill
2014-02-07 13:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-02-07 16:30 ` Steven J. Hill [this message]
2014-02-07 16:30 ` Steven J. Hill
2014-03-22 22:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F50A18.7020008@imgtec.com \
--to=steven.hill@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.