From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [intel_pstate] fcb6a15c: -34.4% aim7 jobs-per-min and -17.0% will-it-scale/page_fault1 Pkg_W
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:54:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F8F629.7040006@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207123315.GA3448@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1309 bytes --]
On 02/07/2014 04:33 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> FYI, we notice dropped power and performance numbers on commit
> fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea889ab40e1c643a4 ("intel_pstate: Take core C0
> time into account for core busy calculation").
>
>
> v3.14-rc1 fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea
> --------------- -------------------------
> 6.53 ~ 4% -12.0% 5.75 ~ 2% lkp-sb03/micro/netperf/120s-200%-SCTP_STREAM
> 147.93 ~ 0% -23.3% 113.40 ~ 0% lkp-sbx04/micro/will-it-scale/page_fault1
> 154.46 ~ 0% -22.9% 119.15 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.Cor_W
>
> v3.14-rc1 fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea
> --------------- -------------------------
> 203 ~ 0% -17.0% 169 ~ 0% lkp-sbx04/micro/will-it-scale/page_fault1
> 203 ~ 0% -17.0% 169 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.Pkg_W
>
These two tests show an improvement in power :-)
> v3.14-rc1 fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea
> --------------- -------------------------
> 572540 ~ 1% -30.2% 399351 ~ 1% grantley/micro/aim7/disk_src
> 317151 ~ 1% -42.0% 183863 ~ 0% grantley/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
> 889692 ~ 1% -34.4% 583214 ~ 1% TOTAL aim7.2000.jobs-per-min
>
I am investigating where the aim benchmark went south.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [intel_pstate] fcb6a15c: -34.4% aim7 jobs-per-min and -17.0% will-it-scale/page_fault1 Pkg_W
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:54:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F8F629.7040006@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207123315.GA3448@localhost>
On 02/07/2014 04:33 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> FYI, we notice dropped power and performance numbers on commit
> fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea889ab40e1c643a4 ("intel_pstate: Take core C0
> time into account for core busy calculation").
>
>
> v3.14-rc1 fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea
> --------------- -------------------------
> 6.53 ~ 4% -12.0% 5.75 ~ 2% lkp-sb03/micro/netperf/120s-200%-SCTP_STREAM
> 147.93 ~ 0% -23.3% 113.40 ~ 0% lkp-sbx04/micro/will-it-scale/page_fault1
> 154.46 ~ 0% -22.9% 119.15 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.Cor_W
>
> v3.14-rc1 fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea
> --------------- -------------------------
> 203 ~ 0% -17.0% 169 ~ 0% lkp-sbx04/micro/will-it-scale/page_fault1
> 203 ~ 0% -17.0% 169 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.Pkg_W
>
These two tests show an improvement in power :-)
> v3.14-rc1 fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea
> --------------- -------------------------
> 572540 ~ 1% -30.2% 399351 ~ 1% grantley/micro/aim7/disk_src
> 317151 ~ 1% -42.0% 183863 ~ 0% grantley/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
> 889692 ~ 1% -34.4% 583214 ~ 1% TOTAL aim7.2000.jobs-per-min
>
I am investigating where the aim benchmark went south.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 12:33 [intel_pstate] fcb6a15c: -34.4% aim7 jobs-per-min and -17.0% will-it-scale/page_fault1 Pkg_W Fengguang Wu
2014-02-07 12:33 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-02-10 15:54 ` Dirk Brandewie [this message]
2014-02-10 15:54 ` Dirk Brandewie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F8F629.7040006@intel.com \
--to=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.