[PATCH v4] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone soc

[grygorii.strashko@ti.com (Grygorii Strashko)]

Hi Linus,

On 02/12/2014 05:03 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> The similar GPIO HW block is used by keystone SoCs as
>> in Davinci SoCs.
>> Hence, reuse Davinci GPIO driver for Keystone taking into
>> account that Keystone contains ARM GIC IRQ controller which
>> is implemented using IRQ Chip.
>>
>> Documentation:
>>          http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf
>>
>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v4:
>> - rebased on top of v3.14 +
>>    [patch] gpio: davinci: signedness bug in davinci_gpio_irq_setup()
>
> I tried applying this and it does not apply on the "devel" branch
> in the GPIO tree. Since I haven't touched one line of code in the
> DaVinci driver since v3.14-rc1 I seriously doubt that this is
> rebased on v3.14[-rc].
>
> Can you please rebase the patch onto v3.14-rc1 for real and
> resend it?

Sorry, But I've to clarify that this patch is based on:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kernel-janitors/msg18017.html
[patch] gpio: davinci: signedness bug in davinci_gpio_irq_setup()

And I did it to avoid merge conflicts between these two patches.

Is it possible to apply above one first? It's not in any of your
branches.

Of Course, I can re-base this patch on clean v3.14-rc1, but then merge
conflict will happen with "gpio: davinci: signedness.." patch.

Regards,
- grygorii