From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: ultralinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: arch/sparc64/Kconfig
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 04:05:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52brio8q1y.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
I recently tested building the OpenIB InfiniBand drivers for sparc64.
These drivers add a new drivers/infiniband directory and hook into the
kernel config system by adding a 'source "drivers/infiniband/Kconfig"'
to the drivers/Kconfig file.
However, I discovered that arch/sparc64/Kconfig includes individual
drivers/xxx/Kconfig files rather than the main drivers/Kconfig. This
means that hooking in the infiniband Kconfig requires changing the
sparc64 Kconfig.
I looked at arch/sparc64/Kconfig and found that the only files it does
not include that are included by drivers/Kconfig are
drivers/cdrom/Kconfig
drivers/char/Kconfig
drivers/macintosh/Kconfig
drivers/message/i2o/Kconfig
drivers/misc/Kconfig
cdrom is safe because the whole thing depends on ISA. macintosh is
safe because it depends on PPC || MAC. misc is safe because it only
includes one entry that depends on X86.
So I guess my questions are, first, is there any reason why the
message/i2o and especially the char Kconfigs are left out of the
sparc64 Kconfig, and second, would a patch changing sparc64 to use the
main drivers/Kconfig be accepted?
Thanks,
Roland
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: ultralinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: arch/sparc64/Kconfig
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:05:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52brio8q1y.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
I recently tested building the OpenIB InfiniBand drivers for sparc64.
These drivers add a new drivers/infiniband directory and hook into the
kernel config system by adding a 'source "drivers/infiniband/Kconfig"'
to the drivers/Kconfig file.
However, I discovered that arch/sparc64/Kconfig includes individual
drivers/xxx/Kconfig files rather than the main drivers/Kconfig. This
means that hooking in the infiniband Kconfig requires changing the
sparc64 Kconfig.
I looked at arch/sparc64/Kconfig and found that the only files it does
not include that are included by drivers/Kconfig are
drivers/cdrom/Kconfig
drivers/char/Kconfig
drivers/macintosh/Kconfig
drivers/message/i2o/Kconfig
drivers/misc/Kconfig
cdrom is safe because the whole thing depends on ISA. macintosh is
safe because it depends on PPC || MAC. misc is safe because it only
includes one entry that depends on X86.
So I guess my questions are, first, is there any reason why the
message/i2o and especially the char Kconfigs are left out of the
sparc64 Kconfig, and second, would a patch changing sparc64 to use the
main drivers/Kconfig be accepted?
Thanks,
Roland
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-10 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-10 4:05 Roland Dreier [this message]
2004-07-10 4:05 ` arch/sparc64/Kconfig Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52brio8q1y.fsf@topspin.com \
--to=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ultralinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.