From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: fix double free from dev_map_notification()
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 17:42:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52f70537-afcf-e384-cb96-2a5b8c032c51@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22ff5f74079470a06e11940f40e05b2db74ca21f.1503272633.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
On 8/20/17 4:48 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> In the current code, dev_map_free() can still race with dev_map_notification().
> In dev_map_free(), we remove dtab from the list of dtabs after we purged
> all entries from it. However, we don't do xchg() with NULL or the like,
> so the entry at that point is still pointing to the device. If a unregister
> notification comes in at the same time, we therefore risk a double-free,
> since the pointer is still present in the map, and then pushed again to
> __dev_map_entry_free().
>
> All this is completely unnecessary. Just remove the dtab from the list
> right before the synchronize_rcu(), so all outstanding readers from the
> notifier list have finished by then, thus we don't need to deal with this
> corner case anymore and also wouldn't need to nullify dev entires. This is
> fine because we iterate over the map releasing all entries and therefore
> dev references anyway.
>
> Fixes: 4cc7b9544b9a ("bpf: devmap fix mutex in rcu critical section")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
makes sense to me
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
I wonder why it was done the other way around in the first place then?
dev_map_list is there only for notifier and since the map is freed
with all the devices totally makes sense to isolate it from notifier
as a first step.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-20 23:48 [PATCH net-next] bpf: fix double free from dev_map_notification() Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-21 0:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2017-08-21 0:47 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-21 2:46 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52f70537-afcf-e384-cb96-2a5b8c032c51@fb.com \
--to=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.