* Should TARGET_NUM_PEER_KEYS == WMI_MAX_KEY_INDEX + 1?
@ 2014-02-17 20:02 Ben Greear
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2014-02-17 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath10k
Maybe this is the reason my firmware is running out of space for keys...
When adding keys, the driver checks for index > WMI_MAX_KEY_INDEX (which is 3),
but when configuring the firmware, TARGET_NUM_PEER_KEYS (2) is used for both
firmware branches.
Maybe the firmware should be told to allocate space for 4 keys for each peer?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-02-17 20:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-17 20:02 Should TARGET_NUM_PEER_KEYS == WMI_MAX_KEY_INDEX + 1? Ben Greear
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.