From: Matija Glavinic Pecotic <matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com>
To: ext Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [sctp] ef2820a735: -50% netperf Throughput_Mbps
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:06:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5304E49A.3000801@nsn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219132034.GC8704@localhost>
Hello Fengguang,
On 02/19/2014 02:20 PM, ext Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Matija,
>
> We noticed the below changes on commit ef2820a735f74ea60335f8ba3801b844f0cb184d
> (" net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver's buffer")
> in netperf SCTP_STREAM tests:
thanks for the info. Though, I've ran netperf in my environment, with and without patch, and I havent observed any difference.
Could you please give me information on your environment, how do you invoke netperf, and other details you think I might be interested in to observe problem by myself
Thanks!
> cd0f0b95fd2cd2b ef2820a735f74ea60335f8ba3
> --------------- -------------------------
> 8 ~ 0% -50.0% 4 ~ 0% TOTAL netperf.Throughput_Mbps
> 54287 ~44% +338.1% 237842 ~48% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-NHM.time
> 12008353 ~12% -56.0% 5281848 ~ 0% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
> 114861 ~ 0% -50.3% 57085 ~ 3% TOTAL softirqs.NET_RX
> 12964639 ~11% -55.1% 5818663 ~ 0% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgfree
> 866489 ~ 0% -43.3% 491417 ~ 0% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma32
> 119373 ~17% -39.1% 72661 ~ 1% TOTAL softirqs.SCHED
> 1985 ~13% -24.3% 1502 ~19% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-128.active_objs
> 2139 ~20% -28.4% 1532 ~ 4% TOTAL proc-vmstat.nr_alloc_batch
> 124360 ~33% -31.0% 85748 ~ 2% TOTAL softirqs.RCU
> 1977 ~ 9% -18.5% 1610 ~ 9% TOTAL slabinfo.UDP.active_objs
> 1977 ~ 9% -18.5% 1610 ~ 9% TOTAL slabinfo.UDP.num_objs
> 2066 ~ 6% -12.9% 1800 ~ 7% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-128.num_objs
> 1738 ~10% -18.4% 1418 ~ 9% TOTAL slabinfo.UDPv6.active_objs
> 1738 ~10% -18.4% 1418 ~ 9% TOTAL slabinfo.UDPv6.num_objs
> 923 ~10% -17.7% 760 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.TCPv6.active_objs
> 923 ~10% -17.7% 760 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.TCPv6.num_objs
> 989 ~ 9% -17.1% 820 ~ 7% TOTAL slabinfo.TCP.active_objs
> 989 ~ 9% -17.1% 820 ~ 7% TOTAL slabinfo.TCP.num_objs
> 398761 ~44% -32.6% 268792 ~ 3% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node2.numa_hit
> 389672 ~49% -32.9% 261443 ~ 3% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
> 447 ~ 1% -13.8% 385 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
>
> Note: the "~ XX%" numbers are stddev percent.
>
> netperf.Throughput_Mbps
>
> 4 *+-*--*--*--*-*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-*--*--*--*
> | |
> | |
> 3.5 ++ |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> 3 ++ |
> | |
> | |
> 2.5 ++ |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> 2 O+-O--O--O--O-O--O--O--O--O--O--O--O-O--O--O--O--O--O--O-------------+
>
>
> vmstat.system.cs
>
> 460 ++------------------------*--*----------------*----------------------+
> | .*.. .*.. : + + *.. .*
> 450 ++ *. .*. *.. : + .*..*.. + *..*..*.. + .*. |
> 440 *+ : * : *..* * * *. |
> |: : * |
> 430 ++: : |
> 420 ++: : |
> | * |
> 410 ++ |
> 400 ++ |
> | |
> 390 ++ O O O O O |
> 380 O+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
> | O |
> 370 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matija Glavinic Pecotic <matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com>
To: ext Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [sctp] ef2820a735: -50% netperf Throughput_Mbps
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:06:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5304E49A.3000801@nsn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219132034.GC8704@localhost>
Hello Fengguang,
On 02/19/2014 02:20 PM, ext Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Matija,
>
> We noticed the below changes on commit ef2820a735f74ea60335f8ba3801b844f0cb184d
> (" net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver's buffer")
> in netperf SCTP_STREAM tests:
thanks for the info. Though, I've ran netperf in my environment, with and without patch, and I havent observed any difference.
Could you please give me information on your environment, how do you invoke netperf, and other details you think I might be interested in to observe problem by myself
Thanks!
> cd0f0b95fd2cd2b ef2820a735f74ea60335f8ba3
> --------------- -------------------------
> 8 ~ 0% -50.0% 4 ~ 0% TOTAL netperf.Throughput_Mbps
> 54287 ~44% +338.1% 237842 ~48% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-NHM.time
> 12008353 ~12% -56.0% 5281848 ~ 0% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
> 114861 ~ 0% -50.3% 57085 ~ 3% TOTAL softirqs.NET_RX
> 12964639 ~11% -55.1% 5818663 ~ 0% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgfree
> 866489 ~ 0% -43.3% 491417 ~ 0% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma32
> 119373 ~17% -39.1% 72661 ~ 1% TOTAL softirqs.SCHED
> 1985 ~13% -24.3% 1502 ~19% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-128.active_objs
> 2139 ~20% -28.4% 1532 ~ 4% TOTAL proc-vmstat.nr_alloc_batch
> 124360 ~33% -31.0% 85748 ~ 2% TOTAL softirqs.RCU
> 1977 ~ 9% -18.5% 1610 ~ 9% TOTAL slabinfo.UDP.active_objs
> 1977 ~ 9% -18.5% 1610 ~ 9% TOTAL slabinfo.UDP.num_objs
> 2066 ~ 6% -12.9% 1800 ~ 7% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-128.num_objs
> 1738 ~10% -18.4% 1418 ~ 9% TOTAL slabinfo.UDPv6.active_objs
> 1738 ~10% -18.4% 1418 ~ 9% TOTAL slabinfo.UDPv6.num_objs
> 923 ~10% -17.7% 760 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.TCPv6.active_objs
> 923 ~10% -17.7% 760 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.TCPv6.num_objs
> 989 ~ 9% -17.1% 820 ~ 7% TOTAL slabinfo.TCP.active_objs
> 989 ~ 9% -17.1% 820 ~ 7% TOTAL slabinfo.TCP.num_objs
> 398761 ~44% -32.6% 268792 ~ 3% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node2.numa_hit
> 389672 ~49% -32.9% 261443 ~ 3% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
> 447 ~ 1% -13.8% 385 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
>
> Note: the "~ XX%" numbers are stddev percent.
>
> netperf.Throughput_Mbps
>
> 4 *+-*--*--*--*-*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-*--*--*--*
> | |
> | |
> 3.5 ++ |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> 3 ++ |
> | |
> | |
> 2.5 ++ |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> 2 O+-O--O--O--O-O--O--O--O--O--O--O--O-O--O--O--O--O--O--O-------------+
>
>
> vmstat.system.cs
>
> 460 ++------------------------*--*----------------*----------------------+
> | .*.. .*.. : + + *.. .*
> 450 ++ *. .*. *.. : + .*..*.. + *..*..*.. + .*. |
> 440 *+ : * : *..* * * *. |
> |: : * |
> 430 ++: : |
> 420 ++: : |
> | * |
> 410 ++ |
> 400 ++ |
> | |
> 390 ++ O O O O O |
> 380 O+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
> | O |
> 370 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-19 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 13:20 [sctp] ef2820a735: -50% netperf Throughput_Mbps Fengguang Wu
2014-02-19 17:06 ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic [this message]
2014-02-19 17:06 ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-02-23 1:37 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-02-23 1:37 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5304E49A.3000801@nsn.com \
--to=matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.