From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:07:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530AFDDB.3080300@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140222114735.38d36f4a-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
On 02/22/2014 06:47 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:17:41 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:04:26 +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>>> Split set&show temp codes as common functions, so we can use it
>>> directly when implement linux thermal framework.
>>> And handle error return value for the lm90_select_remote_channel
>>> and write_tempx, then set_temp8 and set_temp11 could return it
>>> to user-space.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>> (...)
>>
>> Applied with minor edits, thanks.
>
> Wei, what's the status? With Guenter's recent cleanup of the lm90
> driver, this patch no longer applies. I never sent it upstream as it
> makes no sense without users of the new functions defined by the patch.
> Will this ever happen?
>
> For now I am discarding this patch. If it still needed, please rebase
> on top of the current lm90 patch set:
> http://jdelvare.nerim.net/devel/linux-3/jdelvare-hwmon/
> and resend.
Hi, Jean
Sorry for no updates on this patch.
I noticed that in lm75.c, it expose itself as thermal zone device and
register on the thermal framework, so I will also implement it for
lm90.c, base on this patch.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:07:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530AFDDB.3080300@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140222114735.38d36f4a-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
On 02/22/2014 06:47 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:17:41 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:04:26 +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>>> Split set&show temp codes as common functions, so we can use it
>>> directly when implement linux thermal framework.
>>> And handle error return value for the lm90_select_remote_channel
>>> and write_tempx, then set_temp8 and set_temp11 could return it
>>> to user-space.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>> (...)
>>
>> Applied with minor edits, thanks.
>
> Wei, what's the status? With Guenter's recent cleanup of the lm90
> driver, this patch no longer applies. I never sent it upstream as it
> makes no sense without users of the new functions defined by the patch.
> Will this ever happen?
>
> For now I am discarding this patch. If it still needed, please rebase
> on top of the current lm90 patch set:
> http://jdelvare.nerim.net/devel/linux-3/jdelvare-hwmon/
> and resend.
Hi, Jean
Sorry for no updates on this patch.
I noticed that in lm75.c, it expose itself as thermal zone device and
register on the thermal framework, so I will also implement it for
lm90.c, base on this patch.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 7:04 [PATCH v5] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes Wei Ni
2013-10-08 7:04 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1381215866-20608-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-08 7:10 ` Wei Ni
2013-10-08 7:10 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-10-11 7:17 ` Jean Delvare
2013-10-11 7:17 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20131011091741.59cdaf31-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-22 10:47 ` Jean Delvare
2014-02-22 10:47 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20140222114735.38d36f4a-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-22 17:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-02-22 17:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-02-24 8:07 ` Wei Ni [this message]
2014-02-24 8:07 ` Wei Ni
2015-04-21 10:19 ` Wei Ni
2015-04-21 10:19 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2015-04-22 1:57 ` Wei Ni
2015-04-22 1:57 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530AFDDB.3080300@nvidia.com \
--to=wni-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.