All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] loopback: sctp: add NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM to device features
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:31:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <530B1F93.4010308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6C96DE@AcuExch.aculab.com>

On 02/24/2014 11:17 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann
>> Drivers are allowed to set NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM if they have
>> hardware crc32c checksumming support for the SCTP protocol.
>> Currently, NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM flag is available in igb,
>> ixgbe, i40e/i40evf drivers and for vlan devices.
>>
>> If we don't have NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM then crc32c is done
>> through CPU instructions, invoked from crypto layer, or
>> if not available as slow-path fallback in software.
>>
>> Currently, loopback device propagates checksum offloading
>> feature flags in dev->features, but is missing SCTP checksum
>> offloading. Therefore, account for NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM as
>> well.
>>
>> Before patch:
>>
>> ./netperf_sctp -H 192.168.0.100 -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY
>> SCTP 1-TO-MANY STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.0.100 () port 0 AF_INET
>> Recv   Send    Send
>> Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
>> Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
>> bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 4194304 4194304   4096    10.00    4683.50
>>
>> After patch:
> ...
>> 4194304 4194304   4096    10.00    15348.26
>
> That seems a much larger increase than you'd expect from removing
> a software CRC of the data chunks.
> Are you sure that some other difference in the data flows wasn't
> also triggered.

Yes, I run this multiple times with similar results and I double-checked
it with perf. Current code triggers crc32c implementation in software
fallback on my machine which is very expensive.

> I'm also not sure that 4096 is a representative message size for SCTP.

I used netperf default in this case.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] loopback: sctp: add NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM to device features
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:31:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <530B1F93.4010308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6C96DE@AcuExch.aculab.com>

On 02/24/2014 11:17 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann
>> Drivers are allowed to set NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM if they have
>> hardware crc32c checksumming support for the SCTP protocol.
>> Currently, NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM flag is available in igb,
>> ixgbe, i40e/i40evf drivers and for vlan devices.
>>
>> If we don't have NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM then crc32c is done
>> through CPU instructions, invoked from crypto layer, or
>> if not available as slow-path fallback in software.
>>
>> Currently, loopback device propagates checksum offloading
>> feature flags in dev->features, but is missing SCTP checksum
>> offloading. Therefore, account for NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM as
>> well.
>>
>> Before patch:
>>
>> ./netperf_sctp -H 192.168.0.100 -t SCTP_STREAM_MANY
>> SCTP 1-TO-MANY STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.0.100 () port 0 AF_INET
>> Recv   Send    Send
>> Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
>> Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
>> bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 4194304 4194304   4096    10.00    4683.50
>>
>> After patch:
> ...
>> 4194304 4194304   4096    10.00    15348.26
>
> That seems a much larger increase than you'd expect from removing
> a software CRC of the data chunks.
> Are you sure that some other difference in the data flows wasn't
> also triggered.

Yes, I run this multiple times with similar results and I double-checked
it with perf. Current code triggers crc32c implementation in software
fallback on my machine which is very expensive.

> I'm also not sure that 4096 is a representative message size for SCTP.

I used netperf default in this case.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-24 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-22 13:01 [PATCH net-next] loopback: sctp: add NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM to device features Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-22 13:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 10:17 ` David Laight
2014-02-24 10:31   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-02-24 10:31     ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 10:42     ` David Laight
2014-02-24 12:02       ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 12:02         ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 13:24         ` David Laight
2014-02-24 13:36           ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 13:36             ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 14:07             ` David Laight
2014-02-24 14:07               ` David Laight
2014-02-24 14:06           ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 14:06             ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 14:28             ` David Laight
2014-02-25  0:00 ` David Miller
2014-02-25  0:00   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=530B1F93.4010308@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.