Re: [PATCH] ksm: Expose configuration via sysctl

[Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>]

Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
>   
>> On 02/25/2014 03:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>     
>>>> Couldn't we also (maybe in parallel) just teach the sysctl userspace
>>>> about sysfs?  This way we don't have to do parallel sysctls and sysfs
>>>> for *EVERYTHING* in the kernel:
>>>>
>>>>    sysfs.kernel.mm.transparent_hugepage.enabled=enabled
>>>>         
>>> It's pretty hard to filter this. We definitely do not want to expose all of sysfs through /proc/sys. But how do we know which files are actual configuration and which ones are dynamic system introspection data?
>>>
>>> We could add a filter, but then we can just as well stick with the manual approach I followed here :).
>>>       
>> Maybe not stick it under /proc/sys, but teach sysctl(8) about them.  I
>> guess at the moment, sysctl says that it's tied to /proc/sys:
>>
>>     
>>> DESCRIPTION
>>>        sysctl  is  used to modify kernel parameters at runtime.  The parameters available are those listed under /proc/sys/.  Procfs is required
>>>        for sysctl support in Linux.  You can use sysctl to both read and write sysctl data.
>>>       
>> But surely that's not set in stone just because the manpage says so. :)
>>     
>
> What I still don't get is why you need this?
>
> My distribution (Debian) has a sysfsutils package which provides a 
> /etc/sysfs.conf / /etc/sysfs.d/foo exactly like /etc/sysctl.conf.
>
> Don't other distributions have something like this?
>   

Maybe that's the right answer to the problem, but I still don't
understand why these properties were put into sysfs in the first place.
We're not configuring a dynamic device here, are we?

Also if we do want something like a sysfs.conf and sysfs.d, that should
probably be something that gets properly coordinated between
distributions so that users don't get completely confused. Today
openSUSE does not have a sysfs.conf/.d provided by the sysfsutils
package. Maybe it's something homegrown?


Alex

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>