* RX rate mis-reported?
@ 2014-02-28 23:06 Ben Greear
2014-02-28 23:45 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2014-02-28 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath10k
As previously mentioned in the msdu thread, I was seeing funky rates
at high speed when using my modified firmware and driver.
But, on my AP system, which is using standard firmware and standard
ath10k driver, I also see the rates show up improperly:
[root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
6.0 MBit/s
[root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
6.0 MBit/s
[root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
6.0 MBit/s
[root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
234.0 MBit/s
[root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
234.0 MBit/s
[root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
156.0 MBit/s
[root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
234.0 MBit/s
[root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
6.0 MBit/s
This system was sustaining almost 400Mbps TCP download throughput, so it
seems unlikely to me that the return rate would really be this low?
I'd be interested to know what others see for rates when running higher-speed throughput...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RX rate mis-reported?
2014-02-28 23:06 RX rate mis-reported? Ben Greear
@ 2014-02-28 23:45 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-02-28 23:50 ` Ben Greear
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yeoh Chun-Yeow @ 2014-02-28 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Greear; +Cc: ath10k
Hi, Ben
I did have a submitted patch to correct the last_rx_rate due to the
missing of VHT flag:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg119429.html
Maybe you can take a look on this.
-----
Chun-Yeow
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> As previously mentioned in the msdu thread, I was seeing funky rates
> at high speed when using my modified firmware and driver.
>
> But, on my AP system, which is using standard firmware and standard
> ath10k driver, I also see the rates show up improperly:
>
> [root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
> 6.0 MBit/s
> [root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
> 6.0 MBit/s
> [root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
> 6.0 MBit/s
> [root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
> 234.0 MBit/s
> [root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
> 234.0 MBit/s
> [root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
> 156.0 MBit/s
> [root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
> 234.0 MBit/s
> [root@ath10k-2220 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy1/netdev\:vap1/stations/04\:f0\:21\:0e\:38\:41/last_rx_rate
> 6.0 MBit/s
>
> This system was sustaining almost 400Mbps TCP download throughput, so it
> seems unlikely to me that the return rate would really be this low?
>
> I'd be interested to know what others see for rates when running higher-speed throughput...
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RX rate mis-reported?
2014-02-28 23:45 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
@ 2014-02-28 23:50 ` Ben Greear
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2014-02-28 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yeoh Chun-Yeow; +Cc: ath10k
On 02/28/2014 03:45 PM, Yeoh Chun-Yeow wrote:
> Hi, Ben
>
> I did have a submitted patch to correct the last_rx_rate due to the
> missing of VHT flag:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg119429.html
>
> Maybe you can take a look on this.
I did see this, and I'm running it on my station machine, but
I have not updated the AP machine yet...I'll do that and see if
it fixes the problem.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-28 23:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-28 23:06 RX rate mis-reported? Ben Greear
2014-02-28 23:45 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-02-28 23:50 ` Ben Greear
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.