From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: kernfs: possible deadlock between of->mutex and mmap_sem
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:14:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53113485.2090407@oracle.com> (raw)
Hi all,
I've stumbled on the following while fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools running the latest
-next kernel.
We deal with files that have an mmap op by giving them a different locking class than the files
which don't due to mmap_sem nesting being different for those files.
We assume that for mmap supporting files, of->mutex will be nested inside mm->mmap_sem. However,
this is not always the case. Consider the following:
kernfs_fop_write()
copy_from_user()
might_fault()
might_fault() suggests that we may lock mm->mmap_sem, which causes a reverse lock nesting of
mm->mmap_sem inside of of->mutex.
I'll send a patch to fix it some time next week unless someone beats me to it :)
[ 1182.846501] ======================================================
[ 1182.847256] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 1182.848111] 3.14.0-rc4-next-20140228-sasha-00011-g4077c67-dirty #26 Tainted: G W
[ 1182.849088] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 1182.849927] trinity-c236/10658 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 1182.850094] (&of->mutex#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
[ 1182.850094]
[ 1182.850094] but task is already holding lock:
[ 1182.850094] (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<mm/util.c:397>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x6e/0xe0
[ 1182.850094]
[ 1182.850094] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 1182.850094]
[ 1182.850094]
[ 1182.850094] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 1182.850094]
-> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
[ 1182.856968] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131>]
validate_chain+0x6c5/0x7b0
[ 1182.856968] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182>] __lock_acquire+0x4cd/0x5a0
[ 1182.856968] [<arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602>]
lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
[ 1182.856968] [<mm/memory.c:4188>] might_fault+0x7e/0xb0
[ 1182.860975] [<arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:713 fs/kernfs/file.c:291>]
kernfs_fop_write+0xd8/0x190
[ 1182.860975] [<fs/read_write.c:473>] vfs_write+0xe3/0x1d0
[ 1182.860975] [<fs/read_write.c:523 fs/read_write.c:515>] SyS_write+0x5d/0xa0
[ 1182.860975] [<arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
[ 1182.860975]
-> #0 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.+.}:
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1840>] check_prev_add+0x13f/0x560
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131>]
validate_chain+0x6c5/0x7b0
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182>] __lock_acquire+0x4cd/0x5a0
[ 1182.860975] [<arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602>]
lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/mutex.c:470 kernel/locking/mutex.c:571>]
mutex_lock_nested+0x6a/0x510
[ 1182.860975] [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/mmap.c:1573>] mmap_region+0x310/0x5c0
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/mmap.c:1365>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x385/0x430
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/util.c:399>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x8f/0xe0
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/mmap.c:1416 mm/mmap.c:1374>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x1b0/0x210
[ 1182.860975] [<arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:72>] SyS_mmap+0x1d/0x20
[ 1182.860975] [<arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
[ 1182.860975]
[ 1182.860975] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1182.860975]
[ 1182.860975] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1182.860975]
[ 1182.860975] CPU0 CPU1
[ 1182.860975] ---- ----
[ 1182.860975] lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
[ 1182.860975] lock(&of->mutex#2);
[ 1182.860975] lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
[ 1182.860975] lock(&of->mutex#2);
[ 1182.860975]
[ 1182.860975] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1182.860975]
[ 1182.860975] 1 lock held by trinity-c236/10658:
[ 1182.860975] #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<mm/util.c:397>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x6e/0xe0
[ 1182.860975]
[ 1182.860975] stack backtrace:
[ 1182.860975] CPU: 2 PID: 10658 Comm: trinity-c236 Tainted: G W
3.14.0-rc4-next-20140228-sasha-00011-g4077c67-dirty #26
[ 1182.860975] 0000000000000000 ffff88011911fa48 ffffffff8438e945 0000000000000000
[ 1182.860975] 0000000000000000 ffff88011911fa98 ffffffff811a0109 ffff88011911fab8
[ 1182.860975] ffff88011911fab8 ffff88011911fa98 ffff880119128cc0 ffff880119128cf8
[ 1182.860975] Call Trace:
[ 1182.860975] [<lib/dump_stack.c:52>] dump_stack+0x52/0x7f
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1213>] print_circular_bug+0x129/0x160
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1840>] check_prev_add+0x13f/0x560
[ 1182.860975] [<include/linux/spinlock.h:343 mm/slub.c:1933>] ? deactivate_slab+0x511/0x550
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131>]
validate_chain+0x6c5/0x7b0
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182>] __lock_acquire+0x4cd/0x5a0
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/mmap.c:1552>] ? mmap_region+0x24a/0x5c0
[ 1182.860975] [<arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602>]
lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
[ 1182.860975] [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] ? kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/locking/mutex.c:470 kernel/locking/mutex.c:571>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6a/0x510
[ 1182.860975] [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] ? kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/sched/core.c:2477>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50
[ 1182.860975] [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] ? kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
[ 1182.860975] [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/mmap.c:1573>] mmap_region+0x310/0x5c0
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/mmap.c:1365>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x385/0x430
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/util.c:397>] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x6e/0xe0
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/util.c:399>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x8f/0xe0
[ 1182.860975] [<kernel/rcu/update.c:97>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x44/0xb0
[ 1182.860975] [<fs/file.c:641>] ? dup_fd+0x3c0/0x3c0
[ 1182.860975] [<mm/mmap.c:1416 mm/mmap.c:1374>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x1b0/0x210
[ 1182.860975] [<arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:72>] SyS_mmap+0x1d/0x20
[ 1182.860975] [<arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
Thanks,
Sasha
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-01 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-01 1:14 Sasha Levin [this message]
2014-03-01 23:18 ` kernfs: possible deadlock between of->mutex and mmap_sem Dave Chinner
2014-03-03 22:39 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-03 22:44 ` Sasha Levin
2014-03-03 22:46 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-04 20:38 ` [PATCH driver-core-next] kernfs: cache atomic_write_len in kernfs_open_file Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 2:50 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53113485.2090407@oracle.com \
--to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.