From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernfs: possible deadlock between of->mutex and mmap_sem
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:44:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531505E4.8020802@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140303223933.GC26523@mtj.dyndns.org>
On 03/03/2014 05:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 08:14:45PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've stumbled on the following while fuzzing with trinity inside a
>> KVM tools running the latest -next kernel.
>>
>> We deal with files that have an mmap op by giving them a different
>> locking class than the files which don't due to mmap_sem nesting
>> being different for those files.
>>
>> We assume that for mmap supporting files, of->mutex will be nested
>> inside mm->mmap_sem. However, this is not always the case. Consider
>> the following:
>>
>> kernfs_fop_write()
>> copy_from_user()
>> might_fault()
>>
>> might_fault() suggests that we may lock mm->mmap_sem, which causes a
>> reverse lock nesting of mm->mmap_sem inside of of->mutex.
>>
>> I'll send a patch to fix it some time next week unless someone beats me to it :)
>
> How are you planning to fix it? Prolly the right thing to do would be
> caching atomic_write_len in open_file and copy data before grabbing
> any locks.
I've actually didn't have a plan when I wrote that, was just planning on putting effort into it.
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-01 1:14 kernfs: possible deadlock between of->mutex and mmap_sem Sasha Levin
2014-03-01 23:18 ` Dave Chinner
2014-03-03 22:39 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-03 22:44 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2014-03-03 22:46 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-04 20:38 ` [PATCH driver-core-next] kernfs: cache atomic_write_len in kernfs_open_file Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 2:50 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531505E4.8020802@oracle.com \
--to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.