From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
lcapitulino@redhat.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com,
aliguori@amazon.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] hw/core: introduced qemu machine as QOM object
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:31:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5319AE00.7050600@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394040647-20083-2-git-send-email-marcel.a@redhat.com>
Am 05.03.2014 18:30, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum:
> +struct MachineState {
> + /*< private >*/
> + Object parent_obj;
> + /*< public >*/
> +
> + char *accel;
> + bool kernel_irqchip;
> + int kvm_shadow_mem;
> + char *kernel;
> + char *initrd;
> + char *append;
> + char *dtb;
> + char *dumpdtb;
> + int phandle_start;
> + char *dt_compatible;
> + bool dump_guest_core;
> + bool mem_merge;
> + bool usb;
> + char *firmware;
> +
> + QEMUMachineInitArgs init_args;
> +};
If I'm reading directly, init_args is the only field used in this
3-patch series. Should we drop the unused ones for now? Or do you think
we should get the whole conversion done for 2.0 and therefore keep them?
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 17:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] qemu-machine as a QOM object Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-05 17:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] hw/core: introduced qemu machine as " Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-06 22:43 ` Andreas Färber
2014-03-07 11:31 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2014-03-05 17:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] vl: use qemu machine QOM class instead of global machines list Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-06 22:55 ` Andreas Färber
2014-03-05 17:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] hw/boards: converted current_machine to be an instance of MachineCLass Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-05 17:36 ` Eric Blake
2014-03-05 17:59 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-06 23:44 ` Andreas Färber
2014-03-07 1:16 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-03-07 5:40 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-07 5:32 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-07 11:27 ` Andreas Färber
2014-03-07 16:22 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-07 16:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-07 17:30 ` Andreas Färber
2014-03-07 20:41 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-11 15:44 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-11 16:48 ` Andreas Färber
2014-03-11 19:28 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-07 8:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5319AE00.7050600@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.