From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add new state for transactional memory"
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:51:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531D9937.5010705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140310105028.GA5934@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Il 10/03/2014 11:50, Paul Mackerras ha scritto:
> We can either do this revert, or apply a patch removing the extra
> hunk, but one or the other should go in for 3.14 since it's quite
> broken as it is (that is, HV-mode KVM on powerpc is broken).
>
> Paolo, do you have a preference about revert vs. fix? Are you happy
> to take what Aneesh sent (in which case please add my acked-by and
> perhaps edit the commentary to say how the problem arose), or do you
> want a freshly-prepared patch, and if so against which branch?
I prefer a fix.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, agraf@suse.de,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add new state for transactional memory"
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:51:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531D9937.5010705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140310105028.GA5934@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Il 10/03/2014 11:50, Paul Mackerras ha scritto:
> We can either do this revert, or apply a patch removing the extra
> hunk, but one or the other should go in for 3.14 since it's quite
> broken as it is (that is, HV-mode KVM on powerpc is broken).
>
> Paolo, do you have a preference about revert vs. fix? Are you happy
> to take what Aneesh sent (in which case please add my acked-by and
> perhaps edit the commentary to say how the problem arose), or do you
> want a freshly-prepared patch, and if so against which branch?
I prefer a fix.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add new state for transactional memory"
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:51:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531D9937.5010705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140310105028.GA5934@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Il 10/03/2014 11:50, Paul Mackerras ha scritto:
> We can either do this revert, or apply a patch removing the extra
> hunk, but one or the other should go in for 3.14 since it's quite
> broken as it is (that is, HV-mode KVM on powerpc is broken).
>
> Paolo, do you have a preference about revert vs. fix? Are you happy
> to take what Aneesh sent (in which case please add my acked-by and
> perhaps edit the commentary to say how the problem arose), or do you
> want a freshly-prepared patch, and if so against which branch?
I prefer a fix.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-06 10:36 [PATCH 1/2] Revert "KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add new state for transactional memory" Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-06 10:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-06 10:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-06 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix register usage when loading/saving VRSAVE Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-06 10:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-06 10:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-06 11:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add new state for transactional memory" Paul Mackerras
2014-03-06 11:18 ` Paul Mackerras
2014-03-06 11:18 ` Paul Mackerras
2014-03-06 13:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-06 13:41 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-06 13:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-03-10 10:50 ` Paul Mackerras
2014-03-10 10:50 ` Paul Mackerras
2014-03-10 10:50 ` Paul Mackerras
2014-03-10 10:51 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-03-10 10:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-10 10:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531D9937.5010705@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.