* [PATCH] sparc64: don't treat 64-bit syscall return codes as 32-bit
@ 2014-03-14 15:42 Dave Kleikamp
2014-03-17 19:55 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Kleikamp @ 2014-03-14 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sparclinux
When checking a system call return code for an error,
linux_sparc_syscall was sign-extending the lower 32-bit value and
comparing it to -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK. lseek can return valid return
codes whose lower 32-bits alone would indicate a failure (such as 4G-1).
Use the whole 64-bit value to check for errors. Only the 32-bit path
should sign extend the lower 32-bit value.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Allen Pais <allen.pais@oracle.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S b/arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S
index 87729ff..33a17e7 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S
@@ -189,7 +189,8 @@ linux_sparc_syscall32:
mov %i0, %l5 ! IEU1
5: call %l7 ! CTI Group brk forced
srl %i5, 0, %o5 ! IEU1
- ba,a,pt %xcc, 3f
+ ba,pt %xcc, 3f
+ sra %o0, 0, %o0
/* Linux native system calls enter here... */
.align 32
@@ -217,7 +218,6 @@ linux_sparc_syscall:
3: stx %o0, [%sp + PTREGS_OFF + PT_V9_I0]
ret_sys_call:
ldx [%sp + PTREGS_OFF + PT_V9_TSTATE], %g3
- sra %o0, 0, %o0
mov %ulo(TSTATE_XCARRY | TSTATE_ICARRY), %g2
sllx %g2, 32, %g2
--
1.9.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sparc64: don't treat 64-bit syscall return codes as 32-bit
2014-03-14 15:42 [PATCH] sparc64: don't treat 64-bit syscall return codes as 32-bit Dave Kleikamp
@ 2014-03-17 19:55 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-03-17 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sparclinux
From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:42:01 -0500
> When checking a system call return code for an error,
> linux_sparc_syscall was sign-extending the lower 32-bit value and
> comparing it to -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK. lseek can return valid return
> codes whose lower 32-bits alone would indicate a failure (such as 4G-1).
> Use the whole 64-bit value to check for errors. Only the 32-bit path
> should sign extend the lower 32-bit value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
> Acked-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
> Acked-by: Allen Pais <allen.pais@oracle.com>
Looks good, applied and queued up for -stable, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-17 19:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-14 15:42 [PATCH] sparc64: don't treat 64-bit syscall return codes as 32-bit Dave Kleikamp
2014-03-17 19:55 ` David Miller
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.