From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 6/9] powerpc: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:04:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532C2ACD.7070107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532BB5AC.3000904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Anshuman,
On 21/03/14 03:44, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 04:42 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Anshuman,
>>
>> On 07/03/14 06:14, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2014 09:36 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> On 02/19/2014 09:36 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>>> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by making use o=
f
>>>>> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure.
[...]
>>>> When it is UNIFIED we return index 0, which is correct. But the index
>>>> for instruction and data cache seems to be swapped which wrong. This
>>>> will fetch invalid properties for any given cache type.
>>>>
>>
>> Ah, that's silly mistake on my side, will fix it.
>>
>>>> I have done some initial review and testing for this patch's impact on
>>>> PowerPC (ppc64 POWER specifically). I am trying to do some code clean-=
up
>>>> and re-arrangements. Will post out soon. Thanks !
>>
>> Thanks for taking time for testing and reviewing these patches.
>=20
> Now that you got some of the problems to work on and resend the patches, =
I will
> hold on to the clean up patches I had.
>=20
I have done most of the changes but still unable to find why the shared_cpu=
_map
is getting incorrect on PPC. All the other wrong entries are fixed. Any clu=
e on
shared_cpu_map ?
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 6/9] powerpc: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:04:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532C2ACD.7070107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532BB5AC.3000904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Anshuman,
On 21/03/14 03:44, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 04:42 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Anshuman,
>>
>> On 07/03/14 06:14, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2014 09:36 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> On 02/19/2014 09:36 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>>> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by making use of
>>>>> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure.
[...]
>>>> When it is UNIFIED we return index 0, which is correct. But the index
>>>> for instruction and data cache seems to be swapped which wrong. This
>>>> will fetch invalid properties for any given cache type.
>>>>
>>
>> Ah, that's silly mistake on my side, will fix it.
>>
>>>> I have done some initial review and testing for this patch's impact on
>>>> PowerPC (ppc64 POWER specifically). I am trying to do some code clean-up
>>>> and re-arrangements. Will post out soon. Thanks !
>>
>> Thanks for taking time for testing and reviewing these patches.
>
> Now that you got some of the problems to work on and resend the patches, I will
> hold on to the clean up patches I had.
>
I have done most of the changes but still unable to find why the shared_cpu_map
is getting incorrect on PPC. All the other wrong entries are fixed. Any clue on
shared_cpu_map ?
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-21 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 16:06 [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 0/9] drivers: cacheinfo support Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 1/9] drivers: base: add new class "cpu" to group cpu devices Sudeep Holla
2014-03-01 0:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-03-03 7:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 2/9] drivers: base: support cpu cache information interface to userspace via sysfs Sudeep Holla
2014-03-01 0:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-03-03 7:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 3/9] ia64: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 4/9] s390: " Sudeep Holla
2014-02-20 8:38 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-02-20 13:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-20 13:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-20 14:07 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-02-20 14:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 5/9] x86: " Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 6/9] powerpc: " Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-03-07 4:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-03-07 4:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-03-07 6:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-03-07 6:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-03-10 11:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-03-10 11:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-03-21 3:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-03-21 3:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-03-21 12:04 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-03-21 12:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 7/9] ARM64: kernel: add support for cpu cache information Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 8/9] ARM: " Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 9/9] ARM: kernel: add outer cache support for cacheinfo implementation Sudeep Holla
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532C2ACD.7070107@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.