* [PATCH 4/4] vbios/prom: fetch the vbios using only aligned 32-bit accesses
@ 2014-03-25 22:11 Martin Peres
[not found] ` <1395785480-2932-1-git-send-email-martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Peres @ 2014-03-25 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Other kind of accesses are unreliable on Maxwell cards. As advised by NVIDIA,
let's only use 32-bit accesses to fetch the vbios from PROM.
This fixes vbios fetching on my nve7 which failed in certain specific
conditions.
I suggest we Cc stable, for all kernels they still maintain after the big
rewrite.
Suggested-by: Christian Zander <czander-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
---
nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c b/nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c
index 5608530..baa5687 100644
--- a/nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c
+++ b/nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c
@@ -157,6 +157,10 @@ nouveau_bios_shadow_prom(struct nouveau_bios *bios)
pcireg = 0x001850;
access = nv_mask(bios, pcireg, 0x00000001, 0x00000000);
+ /* WARNING: PROM accesses should always be 32-bits aligned. Other
+ * accesses work on most chipset but do not on Kepler chipsets
+ */
+
/* bail if no rom signature, with a workaround for a PROM reading
* issue on some chipsets. the first read after a period of
* inactivity returns the wrong result, so retry the first header
@@ -164,31 +168,38 @@ nouveau_bios_shadow_prom(struct nouveau_bios *bios)
*/
i = 16;
do {
- if (nv_rd08(bios, 0x300000) == 0x55)
+ if ((nv_rd32(bios, 0x300000) & 0xffff) == 0xaa55)
break;
} while (i--);
- if (!i || nv_rd08(bios, 0x300001) != 0xaa)
+ if (!i)
goto out;
- /* additional check (see note below) - read PCI record header */
- pcir = nv_rd08(bios, 0x300018) |
- nv_rd08(bios, 0x300019) << 8;
- if (nv_rd08(bios, 0x300000 + pcir) != 'P' ||
- nv_rd08(bios, 0x300001 + pcir) != 'C' ||
- nv_rd08(bios, 0x300002 + pcir) != 'I' ||
- nv_rd08(bios, 0x300003 + pcir) != 'R')
+ /* check the PCI record header ("PCIR") if its address is aligned */
+ pcir = nv_rd32(bios, 0x300018) & 0xffff;
+ if ((pcir % 4) == 0 && nv_rd32(bios, 0x300000 + pcir) != 0x52494350)
goto out;
/* read entire bios image to system memory */
- bios->size = nv_rd08(bios, 0x300002) * 512;
+ bios->size = ((nv_rd32(bios, 0x300000) >> 16) & 0xff) * 512;
if (!bios->size)
goto out;
bios->data = kmalloc(bios->size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (bios->data) {
- for (i = 0; i < bios->size; i++)
- nv_wo08(bios, i, nv_rd08(bios, 0x300000 + i));
+ for (i = 0; i < bios->size; i+=4)
+ nv_wo32(bios, i, nv_rd32(bios, 0x300000 + i));
+ }
+
+ /* check the PCI record header again, now that we can make
+ * un-aligned accesses
+ */
+ if (bios->data[pcir + 0] != 'P' ||
+ bios->data[pcir + 1] != 'C' ||
+ bios->data[pcir + 2] != 'I' ||
+ bios->data[pcir + 3] != 'R') {
+ bios->size = 0;
+ kfree(bios->data);
}
out:
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] vbios/prom: fetch the vbios using only aligned 32-bit accesses
[not found] ` <1395785480-2932-1-git-send-email-martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2014-03-25 22:24 ` Ilia Mirkin
[not found] ` <CAKb7Uvhahzo7S-B63V=tQQK=gbXhV4qv13qbF-ePBOP8d2Ce1g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ilia Mirkin @ 2014-03-25 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Peres; +Cc: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Other kind of accesses are unreliable on Maxwell cards. As advised by NVIDIA,
Maxwell or Kepler?
> let's only use 32-bit accesses to fetch the vbios from PROM.
>
> This fixes vbios fetching on my nve7 which failed in certain specific
> conditions.
>
> I suggest we Cc stable, for all kernels they still maintain after the big
> rewrite.
Just throw in the Cc :) Easier to just have it there than to have to
go in and edit the commit description to remove this comment and add
the Cc line...
>
> Suggested-by: Christian Zander <czander-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c b/nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c
> index 5608530..baa5687 100644
> --- a/nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c
> +++ b/nvkm/subdev/bios/base.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,10 @@ nouveau_bios_shadow_prom(struct nouveau_bios *bios)
> pcireg = 0x001850;
> access = nv_mask(bios, pcireg, 0x00000001, 0x00000000);
>
> + /* WARNING: PROM accesses should always be 32-bits aligned. Other
> + * accesses work on most chipset but do not on Kepler chipsets
> + */
> +
> /* bail if no rom signature, with a workaround for a PROM reading
> * issue on some chipsets. the first read after a period of
> * inactivity returns the wrong result, so retry the first header
> @@ -164,31 +168,38 @@ nouveau_bios_shadow_prom(struct nouveau_bios *bios)
> */
> i = 16;
> do {
> - if (nv_rd08(bios, 0x300000) == 0x55)
> + if ((nv_rd32(bios, 0x300000) & 0xffff) == 0xaa55)
> break;
> } while (i--);
>
> - if (!i || nv_rd08(bios, 0x300001) != 0xaa)
> + if (!i)
> goto out;
>
> - /* additional check (see note below) - read PCI record header */
> - pcir = nv_rd08(bios, 0x300018) |
> - nv_rd08(bios, 0x300019) << 8;
> - if (nv_rd08(bios, 0x300000 + pcir) != 'P' ||
> - nv_rd08(bios, 0x300001 + pcir) != 'C' ||
> - nv_rd08(bios, 0x300002 + pcir) != 'I' ||
> - nv_rd08(bios, 0x300003 + pcir) != 'R')
> + /* check the PCI record header ("PCIR") if its address is aligned */
> + pcir = nv_rd32(bios, 0x300018) & 0xffff;
> + if ((pcir % 4) == 0 && nv_rd32(bios, 0x300000 + pcir) != 0x52494350)
> goto out;
So if pcir % 4 != 0, it's all OK? Perhaps you meant
if (pcir & 0x3 || nv_rd32(...) != ...)
goto out
>
> /* read entire bios image to system memory */
> - bios->size = nv_rd08(bios, 0x300002) * 512;
> + bios->size = ((nv_rd32(bios, 0x300000) >> 16) & 0xff) * 512;
You already read this out once, might as well save it. BTW, is CPU
endianness affected here? i.e. does nv_rd32 do a le32 -> be32
conversion on a be cpu? I would assume it must since everything
assumes that 32-bit reads read in integer values... but then your
logic is all wrong, since the bytes are laid out in a different order
on be.
> if (!bios->size)
> goto out;
>
> bios->data = kmalloc(bios->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (bios->data) {
> - for (i = 0; i < bios->size; i++)
> - nv_wo08(bios, i, nv_rd08(bios, 0x300000 + i));
> + for (i = 0; i < bios->size; i+=4)
> + nv_wo32(bios, i, nv_rd32(bios, 0x300000 + i));
> + }
> +
> + /* check the PCI record header again, now that we can make
> + * un-aligned accesses
Why bother with the two separate mechanisms? In practice, is PCIR ever
at a non-mod4 location? (Should be easy to check our bios
collection...)
> + */
> + if (bios->data[pcir + 0] != 'P' ||
> + bios->data[pcir + 1] != 'C' ||
> + bios->data[pcir + 2] != 'I' ||
> + bios->data[pcir + 3] != 'R') {
> + bios->size = 0;
> + kfree(bios->data);
> }
>
> out:
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] vbios/prom: fetch the vbios using only aligned 32-bit accesses
[not found] ` <CAKb7Uvhahzo7S-B63V=tQQK=gbXhV4qv13qbF-ePBOP8d2Ce1g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2014-03-25 22:30 ` Martin Peres
[not found] ` <53320379.7080604-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Peres @ 2014-03-25 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilia Mirkin; +Cc: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
On 25/03/2014 23:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Other kind of accesses are unreliable on Maxwell cards. As advised by NVIDIA,
> Maxwell or Kepler?
Damn, I meant Kepler.
I updated the patch in my git tree:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mperes/nouveau/commit/?id=661a5c599565686f72e729600b0dd6aa6e472f0c
>
>> let's only use 32-bit accesses to fetch the vbios from PROM.
>>
>> This fixes vbios fetching on my nve7 which failed in certain specific
>> conditions.
>>
>> I suggest we Cc stable, for all kernels they still maintain after the big
>> rewrite.
> Just throw in the Cc :) Easier to just have it there than to have to
> go in and edit the commit description to remove this comment and add
> the Cc line...
I don't want git send-email to send an email to stable, the patch won't
apply on any kernel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] vbios/prom: fetch the vbios using only aligned 32-bit accesses
[not found] ` <53320379.7080604-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2014-03-25 22:37 ` Ilia Mirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ilia Mirkin @ 2014-03-25 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Peres; +Cc: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 25/03/2014 23:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Other kind of accesses are unreliable on Maxwell cards. As advised by
>>> NVIDIA,
>>
>> Maxwell or Kepler?
>
>
> Damn, I meant Kepler.
>
> I updated the patch in my git tree:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mperes/nouveau/commit/?id=661a5c599565686f72e729600b0dd6aa6e472f0c
>
>>
>>> let's only use 32-bit accesses to fetch the vbios from PROM.
>>>
>>> This fixes vbios fetching on my nve7 which failed in certain specific
>>> conditions.
>>>
>>> I suggest we Cc stable, for all kernels they still maintain after the big
>>> rewrite.
>>
>> Just throw in the Cc :) Easier to just have it there than to have to
>> go in and edit the commit description to remove this comment and add
>> the Cc line...
>
>
> I don't want git send-email to send an email to stable, the patch won't
> apply on any kernel.
>
--suppress-cc=bodycc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-25 22:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-25 22:11 [PATCH 4/4] vbios/prom: fetch the vbios using only aligned 32-bit accesses Martin Peres
[not found] ` <1395785480-2932-1-git-send-email-martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 22:24 ` Ilia Mirkin
[not found] ` <CAKb7Uvhahzo7S-B63V=tQQK=gbXhV4qv13qbF-ePBOP8d2Ce1g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 22:30 ` Martin Peres
[not found] ` <53320379.7080604-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 22:37 ` Ilia Mirkin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.