From: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Cc: "Li, Zhen-Hua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 1/1] virtio-blk: Use a req pool instead of malloc/free
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:07:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53323655.7070102@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395799358-16499-1-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com>
I am sorry that seems it was not sent out before I subscribed to the
list. So I send this patch again.
On 03/26/2014 10:02 AM, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
> From: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
>
> In virtio-blk module, when there is new request, new req structure
> will be created by malloc. Use a req pool instead of this, will increase
> performance;
>
> Increacement: about 5% to 10%.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li, ZhenHua <zhen-hual@hp.com>
> ---
> hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> index 8a568e5..da5b570 100644
> --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,70 @@ typedef struct VirtIOBlockReq
> BlockAcctCookie acct;
> } VirtIOBlockReq;
>
> +#define POOL_PAGE 512
> +static VirtIOBlockReq * * req_pool;
> +static char * req_pool_used;
> +static unsigned long req_pool_size = 0;
> +
> +static void remalloc_reqs(void){
> + unsigned long old_size = req_pool_size;
> + unsigned long int i;
> + char * old_used = req_pool_used;
> + VirtIOBlockReq * * old_pool = req_pool;
> +
> + req_pool_size += POOL_PAGE;
> + req_pool_used = (char * )malloc(req_pool_size * sizeof(char));
> + req_pool = (VirtIOBlockReq * * )malloc(req_pool_size * sizeof(VirtIOBlockReq *));
> +
> + if(old_size != 0){
> + memcpy(req_pool_used, old_used, old_size*(sizeof(char)));
> + memcpy(req_pool, old_pool, old_size*(sizeof(VirtIOBlockReq *)));
> + }
> + for(i=old_size; i<req_pool_size; i++){
> + req_pool[i] = (VirtIOBlockReq *)malloc(sizeof(VirtIOBlockReq));
> + req_pool_used[i] = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if(old_size != 0){
> + free(old_used);
> + free(old_pool);
> + }
> +}
> +static VirtIOBlockReq * req_pool_get_new(void){
> + unsigned long int i;
> + char * used;
> + VirtIOBlockReq * * req;
> +
> + if(req_pool_size == 0){
> + remalloc_reqs();
> + }
> + for(i=0, used=req_pool_used, req=req_pool;
> + i<req_pool_size; i++, used ++, req++){
> + if(*used == 0){
> + *used = 1;
> + return *req;
> + }
> + }
> + remalloc_reqs();
> + req_pool_used[req_pool_size-POOL_PAGE] = 1;
> + *req = req_pool[req_pool_size-POOL_PAGE];
> + return *req;
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_blk_free_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req0){
> + unsigned long int i;
> + char * used;
> + VirtIOBlockReq * * req;
> +
> + for(i=0, used=req_pool_used, req=req_pool;
> + i<req_pool_size; i++, used ++, req++){
> + if(*req == req0){
> + *used = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
> static void virtio_blk_req_complete(VirtIOBlockReq *req, int status)
> {
> VirtIOBlock *s = req->dev;
> @@ -63,7 +127,7 @@ static int virtio_blk_handle_rw_error(VirtIOBlockReq *req, int error,
> } else if (action == BDRV_ACTION_REPORT) {
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR);
> bdrv_acct_done(s->bs, &req->acct);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
>
> bdrv_error_action(s->bs, action, is_read, error);
> @@ -84,7 +148,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_rw_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
>
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK);
> bdrv_acct_done(req->dev->bs, &req->acct);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
>
> static void virtio_blk_flush_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
> @@ -99,25 +163,24 @@ static void virtio_blk_flush_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
>
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK);
> bdrv_acct_done(req->dev->bs, &req->acct);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
> -
> static VirtIOBlockReq *virtio_blk_alloc_request(VirtIOBlock *s)
> {
> - VirtIOBlockReq *req = g_malloc(sizeof(*req));
> + VirtIOBlockReq *req ;
> + req = req_pool_get_new();
> req->dev = s;
> req->qiov.size = 0;
> req->next = NULL;
> return req;
> }
> -
> static VirtIOBlockReq *virtio_blk_get_request(VirtIOBlock *s)
> {
> VirtIOBlockReq *req = virtio_blk_alloc_request(s);
>
> if (req != NULL) {
> if (!virtqueue_pop(s->vq, &req->elem)) {
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> return NULL;
> }
> }
> @@ -142,7 +205,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
> */
> if (req->elem.out_num < 2 || req->elem.in_num < 3) {
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -232,7 +295,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
> stl_p(&req->scsi->data_len, hdr.dxfer_len);
>
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, status);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> return;
> #else
> abort();
> @@ -242,7 +305,7 @@ fail:
> /* Just put anything nonzero so that the ioctl fails in the guest. */
> stl_p(&req->scsi->errors, 255);
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, status);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
>
> typedef struct MultiReqBuffer {
> @@ -375,7 +438,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req,
> s->blk.serial ? s->blk.serial : "",
> MIN(req->elem.in_sg[0].iov_len, VIRTIO_BLK_ID_BYTES));
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> } else if (type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT) {
> qemu_iovec_init_external(&req->qiov, &req->elem.out_sg[1],
> req->elem.out_num - 1);
> @@ -387,7 +450,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req,
> virtio_blk_handle_read(req);
> } else {
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
> }
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Cc: "Li, Zhen-Hua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] virtio-blk: Use a req pool instead of malloc/free
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:07:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53323655.7070102@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395799358-16499-1-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com>
I am sorry that seems it was not sent out before I subscribed to the
list. So I send this patch again.
On 03/26/2014 10:02 AM, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
> From: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
>
> In virtio-blk module, when there is new request, new req structure
> will be created by malloc. Use a req pool instead of this, will increase
> performance;
>
> Increacement: about 5% to 10%.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li, ZhenHua <zhen-hual@hp.com>
> ---
> hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> index 8a568e5..da5b570 100644
> --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,70 @@ typedef struct VirtIOBlockReq
> BlockAcctCookie acct;
> } VirtIOBlockReq;
>
> +#define POOL_PAGE 512
> +static VirtIOBlockReq * * req_pool;
> +static char * req_pool_used;
> +static unsigned long req_pool_size = 0;
> +
> +static void remalloc_reqs(void){
> + unsigned long old_size = req_pool_size;
> + unsigned long int i;
> + char * old_used = req_pool_used;
> + VirtIOBlockReq * * old_pool = req_pool;
> +
> + req_pool_size += POOL_PAGE;
> + req_pool_used = (char * )malloc(req_pool_size * sizeof(char));
> + req_pool = (VirtIOBlockReq * * )malloc(req_pool_size * sizeof(VirtIOBlockReq *));
> +
> + if(old_size != 0){
> + memcpy(req_pool_used, old_used, old_size*(sizeof(char)));
> + memcpy(req_pool, old_pool, old_size*(sizeof(VirtIOBlockReq *)));
> + }
> + for(i=old_size; i<req_pool_size; i++){
> + req_pool[i] = (VirtIOBlockReq *)malloc(sizeof(VirtIOBlockReq));
> + req_pool_used[i] = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if(old_size != 0){
> + free(old_used);
> + free(old_pool);
> + }
> +}
> +static VirtIOBlockReq * req_pool_get_new(void){
> + unsigned long int i;
> + char * used;
> + VirtIOBlockReq * * req;
> +
> + if(req_pool_size == 0){
> + remalloc_reqs();
> + }
> + for(i=0, used=req_pool_used, req=req_pool;
> + i<req_pool_size; i++, used ++, req++){
> + if(*used == 0){
> + *used = 1;
> + return *req;
> + }
> + }
> + remalloc_reqs();
> + req_pool_used[req_pool_size-POOL_PAGE] = 1;
> + *req = req_pool[req_pool_size-POOL_PAGE];
> + return *req;
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_blk_free_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req0){
> + unsigned long int i;
> + char * used;
> + VirtIOBlockReq * * req;
> +
> + for(i=0, used=req_pool_used, req=req_pool;
> + i<req_pool_size; i++, used ++, req++){
> + if(*req == req0){
> + *used = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
> static void virtio_blk_req_complete(VirtIOBlockReq *req, int status)
> {
> VirtIOBlock *s = req->dev;
> @@ -63,7 +127,7 @@ static int virtio_blk_handle_rw_error(VirtIOBlockReq *req, int error,
> } else if (action == BDRV_ACTION_REPORT) {
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR);
> bdrv_acct_done(s->bs, &req->acct);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
>
> bdrv_error_action(s->bs, action, is_read, error);
> @@ -84,7 +148,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_rw_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
>
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK);
> bdrv_acct_done(req->dev->bs, &req->acct);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
>
> static void virtio_blk_flush_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
> @@ -99,25 +163,24 @@ static void virtio_blk_flush_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
>
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK);
> bdrv_acct_done(req->dev->bs, &req->acct);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
> -
> static VirtIOBlockReq *virtio_blk_alloc_request(VirtIOBlock *s)
> {
> - VirtIOBlockReq *req = g_malloc(sizeof(*req));
> + VirtIOBlockReq *req ;
> + req = req_pool_get_new();
> req->dev = s;
> req->qiov.size = 0;
> req->next = NULL;
> return req;
> }
> -
> static VirtIOBlockReq *virtio_blk_get_request(VirtIOBlock *s)
> {
> VirtIOBlockReq *req = virtio_blk_alloc_request(s);
>
> if (req != NULL) {
> if (!virtqueue_pop(s->vq, &req->elem)) {
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> return NULL;
> }
> }
> @@ -142,7 +205,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
> */
> if (req->elem.out_num < 2 || req->elem.in_num < 3) {
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -232,7 +295,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
> stl_p(&req->scsi->data_len, hdr.dxfer_len);
>
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, status);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> return;
> #else
> abort();
> @@ -242,7 +305,7 @@ fail:
> /* Just put anything nonzero so that the ioctl fails in the guest. */
> stl_p(&req->scsi->errors, 255);
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, status);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
>
> typedef struct MultiReqBuffer {
> @@ -375,7 +438,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req,
> s->blk.serial ? s->blk.serial : "",
> MIN(req->elem.in_sg[0].iov_len, VIRTIO_BLK_ID_BYTES));
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> } else if (type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT) {
> qemu_iovec_init_external(&req->qiov, &req->elem.out_sg[1],
> req->elem.out_num - 1);
> @@ -387,7 +450,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req,
> virtio_blk_handle_read(req);
> } else {
> virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP);
> - g_free(req);
> + virtio_blk_free_request(req);
> }
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-26 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-26 2:02 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 1/1] virtio-blk: Use a req pool instead of malloc/free Li, Zhen-Hua
2014-03-26 2:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Li, Zhen-Hua
2014-03-26 2:07 ` Li, ZhenHua [this message]
2014-03-26 2:07 ` Li, ZhenHua
2014-03-26 9:55 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-26 9:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-26 9:59 ` Li, ZhenHua
2014-03-26 10:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-25 8:42 [Qemu-trivial] " Li, Zhen-Hua
2014-03-27 5:07 ` Michael Tokarev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53323655.7070102@hp.com \
--to=zhen-hual@hp.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.