All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Arun Shamanna Lakshmi <aruns@nvidia.com>
Cc: Songhee Baek <sbaek@nvidia.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, swarren@wwwdotorg.org,
	tiwai@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Add support for multi register mux
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:27:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533D1B65.3030405@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396494710-20944-1-git-send-email-aruns@nvidia.com>

On 04/03/2014 05:11 AM, Arun Shamanna Lakshmi wrote:

This looks essentially good to me. A few minor issues, once those are fixed 
things should be good to go.

[...]
>   struct snd_soc_dapm_update {
>   	struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol;
> -	int reg;
> -	int mask;
> -	int val;
> +	int reg[3];
> +	int mask[3];
> +	int val[3];

Make the 3 a define and check against it in the put handler.

> +	int num_regs;

unsigned int

>   };
[...]
> +/*
> + * Soc Enum Type
> + *
> + * @NONE:    soc_enum type for SINGLE, DOUBLE or VIRTUAL mux
> + * @ONEHOT:  soc_enum type for one hot encoding mux
> + */


This should be kernel doc style so

/**
  * enum snd_soc_enum_type - Type of the ASoC enum control
  * @SND_SOC_ENUM_NONE: ...
  * ...
  */


> +enum snd_soc_enum_type {
> +	SND_SOC_ENUM_NONE = 0,

I'm not sure if NONE is the right term. Maybe BINARY is better.

> +	SND_SOC_ENUM_ONEHOT = 1,
> +};
> +
[...]
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> index c8a780d..19b004a 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> @@ -511,13 +511,26 @@ static int dapm_connect_mux(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
>   	const struct snd_kcontrol_new *kcontrol)
>   {
>   	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
> -	unsigned int val, item;
> +	unsigned int val, item, bit_pos = -1;

default for bit_pos should probably be 0.

[...]
> @@ -1575,8 +1588,12 @@ static void dapm_widget_update(struct snd_soc_card *card)
>   	if (!w)
>   		return;
>
> -	ret = soc_widget_update_bits_locked(w, update->reg, update->mask,
> -				  update->val);
> +	/* dapm update for multiple registers */
> +	for (i = 0; i < update->num_regs; i++) {
> +		ret |= soc_widget_update_bits_locked(w, update->reg[i],
> +					update->mask[i], update->val[i]);

I'd prefer
	ret = soc_widget_update_bits_locked(...);
	if (ret < 0)
		break;

> +	}
> +
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		dev_err(w->dapm->dev, "ASoC: %s DAPM update failed: %d\n",
>   			w->name, ret);
[...]
> @@ -2984,6 +3002,112 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double);
>
>   /**
> + * snd_soc_dapm_get_enum_onehot - dapm enumerated onehot mixer get callback
> + * @kcontrol: mixer control
> + * @ucontrol: control element information
> + *
> + * Callback to get the value of a dapm enumerated onehot encoded mixer control
> + *
> + * Returns 0 for success.
> + */
> +int snd_soc_dapm_get_enum_onehot(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> +			struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol);
> +	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
> +	unsigned int reg_val, val, bit_pos = -1, reg_idx;

Here as well, default for bit_pos should be 0.

> +
> +	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < e->num_regs; reg_idx++) {
> +		reg_val = snd_soc_read(codec, e->reg[reg_idx]);
> +		val = reg_val & e->mask[reg_idx];
> +		if (val != 0) {
> +			bit_pos = __ffs(val) + (8 * codec->val_bytes * reg_idx);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] =
> +			snd_soc_enum_val_to_item(e, bit_pos);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_get_enum_onehot);
> +
> +/**
> + * snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_onehot - dapm enumerated onehot mixer put callback
> + * @kcontrol: mixer control
> + * @ucontrol: control element information
> + *
> + * Callback to put the value of a dapm enumerated onehot encoded mixer control
> + *
> + * Returns 0 for success.
> + */
> +int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_onehot(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> +			struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol);
> +	struct snd_soc_card *card = codec->card;
> +	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
> +	unsigned int *item = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item;
> +	unsigned int change = 0, reg_idx = 0, value, bit_pos;
> +	struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
> +	int ret = 0, reg_val = 0, i, update_idx = 0;
> +
> +	if (item[0] >= e->items)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	value = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, item[0]);
> +
> +	if (value >= 0) {

value is unsigned int, so this is never false.

> +		/* get the register index and value to set */
> +		reg_idx = value / (8 * codec->val_bytes);
> +		bit_pos = value % (8 * codec->val_bytes);
> +		reg_val = BIT(bit_pos);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < e->num_regs; i++) {
> +		if (i == reg_idx) {
> +			change = snd_soc_test_bits(codec, e->reg[i],
> +							e->mask[i], reg_val);

change |=

> +			/* set the selected register */
> +			update.reg[e->num_regs - 1] = e->reg[reg_idx];
> +			update.mask[e->num_regs - 1] = e->mask[reg_idx];
> +			update.val[e->num_regs - 1] = reg_val;
> +		} else {
> +			/* accumulate the change to update the DAPM path
> +			    when none is selected */
> +			change |= snd_soc_test_bits(codec, e->reg[i],
> +							e->mask[i], 0);
> +
> +			/* clear the register when not selected */
> +			update.reg[update_idx] = e->reg[i];
> +			update.mask[update_idx] = e->mask[i];
> +			update.val[update_idx++] = 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_lock_nested(&card->dapm_mutex, SND_SOC_DAPM_CLASS_RUNTIME);
> +
> +	if (change) {
> +		update.kcontrol = kcontrol;
> +		update.num_regs = 3;

Should be e->num_regs;

> +		card->update = &update;
> +
> +		ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, item[0], e);
> +
> +		card->update = NULL;
> +	}
> +

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Arun Shamanna Lakshmi <aruns@nvidia.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, swarren@wwwdotorg.org,
	perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Songhee Baek <sbaek@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Add support for multi register mux
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:27:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533D1B65.3030405@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396494710-20944-1-git-send-email-aruns@nvidia.com>

On 04/03/2014 05:11 AM, Arun Shamanna Lakshmi wrote:

This looks essentially good to me. A few minor issues, once those are fixed 
things should be good to go.

[...]
>   struct snd_soc_dapm_update {
>   	struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol;
> -	int reg;
> -	int mask;
> -	int val;
> +	int reg[3];
> +	int mask[3];
> +	int val[3];

Make the 3 a define and check against it in the put handler.

> +	int num_regs;

unsigned int

>   };
[...]
> +/*
> + * Soc Enum Type
> + *
> + * @NONE:    soc_enum type for SINGLE, DOUBLE or VIRTUAL mux
> + * @ONEHOT:  soc_enum type for one hot encoding mux
> + */


This should be kernel doc style so

/**
  * enum snd_soc_enum_type - Type of the ASoC enum control
  * @SND_SOC_ENUM_NONE: ...
  * ...
  */


> +enum snd_soc_enum_type {
> +	SND_SOC_ENUM_NONE = 0,

I'm not sure if NONE is the right term. Maybe BINARY is better.

> +	SND_SOC_ENUM_ONEHOT = 1,
> +};
> +
[...]
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> index c8a780d..19b004a 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> @@ -511,13 +511,26 @@ static int dapm_connect_mux(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
>   	const struct snd_kcontrol_new *kcontrol)
>   {
>   	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
> -	unsigned int val, item;
> +	unsigned int val, item, bit_pos = -1;

default for bit_pos should probably be 0.

[...]
> @@ -1575,8 +1588,12 @@ static void dapm_widget_update(struct snd_soc_card *card)
>   	if (!w)
>   		return;
>
> -	ret = soc_widget_update_bits_locked(w, update->reg, update->mask,
> -				  update->val);
> +	/* dapm update for multiple registers */
> +	for (i = 0; i < update->num_regs; i++) {
> +		ret |= soc_widget_update_bits_locked(w, update->reg[i],
> +					update->mask[i], update->val[i]);

I'd prefer
	ret = soc_widget_update_bits_locked(...);
	if (ret < 0)
		break;

> +	}
> +
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		dev_err(w->dapm->dev, "ASoC: %s DAPM update failed: %d\n",
>   			w->name, ret);
[...]
> @@ -2984,6 +3002,112 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double);
>
>   /**
> + * snd_soc_dapm_get_enum_onehot - dapm enumerated onehot mixer get callback
> + * @kcontrol: mixer control
> + * @ucontrol: control element information
> + *
> + * Callback to get the value of a dapm enumerated onehot encoded mixer control
> + *
> + * Returns 0 for success.
> + */
> +int snd_soc_dapm_get_enum_onehot(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> +			struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol);
> +	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
> +	unsigned int reg_val, val, bit_pos = -1, reg_idx;

Here as well, default for bit_pos should be 0.

> +
> +	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < e->num_regs; reg_idx++) {
> +		reg_val = snd_soc_read(codec, e->reg[reg_idx]);
> +		val = reg_val & e->mask[reg_idx];
> +		if (val != 0) {
> +			bit_pos = __ffs(val) + (8 * codec->val_bytes * reg_idx);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] =
> +			snd_soc_enum_val_to_item(e, bit_pos);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_get_enum_onehot);
> +
> +/**
> + * snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_onehot - dapm enumerated onehot mixer put callback
> + * @kcontrol: mixer control
> + * @ucontrol: control element information
> + *
> + * Callback to put the value of a dapm enumerated onehot encoded mixer control
> + *
> + * Returns 0 for success.
> + */
> +int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_onehot(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> +			struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol);
> +	struct snd_soc_card *card = codec->card;
> +	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
> +	unsigned int *item = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item;
> +	unsigned int change = 0, reg_idx = 0, value, bit_pos;
> +	struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
> +	int ret = 0, reg_val = 0, i, update_idx = 0;
> +
> +	if (item[0] >= e->items)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	value = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, item[0]);
> +
> +	if (value >= 0) {

value is unsigned int, so this is never false.

> +		/* get the register index and value to set */
> +		reg_idx = value / (8 * codec->val_bytes);
> +		bit_pos = value % (8 * codec->val_bytes);
> +		reg_val = BIT(bit_pos);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < e->num_regs; i++) {
> +		if (i == reg_idx) {
> +			change = snd_soc_test_bits(codec, e->reg[i],
> +							e->mask[i], reg_val);

change |=

> +			/* set the selected register */
> +			update.reg[e->num_regs - 1] = e->reg[reg_idx];
> +			update.mask[e->num_regs - 1] = e->mask[reg_idx];
> +			update.val[e->num_regs - 1] = reg_val;
> +		} else {
> +			/* accumulate the change to update the DAPM path
> +			    when none is selected */
> +			change |= snd_soc_test_bits(codec, e->reg[i],
> +							e->mask[i], 0);
> +
> +			/* clear the register when not selected */
> +			update.reg[update_idx] = e->reg[i];
> +			update.mask[update_idx] = e->mask[i];
> +			update.val[update_idx++] = 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_lock_nested(&card->dapm_mutex, SND_SOC_DAPM_CLASS_RUNTIME);
> +
> +	if (change) {
> +		update.kcontrol = kcontrol;
> +		update.num_regs = 3;

Should be e->num_regs;

> +		card->update = &update;
> +
> +		ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, item[0], e);
> +
> +		card->update = NULL;
> +	}
> +


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-03  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-03  3:11 [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Add support for multi register mux Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-03  3:11 ` Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-03  8:27 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2014-04-03  8:27   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-03  9:40   ` Mark Brown
2014-04-03  9:40     ` Mark Brown
2014-04-03 20:11   ` Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-04  7:31     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-04  7:34       ` Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-04  7:40         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-03  9:47 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-04-03  9:47   ` Takashi Iwai
2014-04-03  9:53   ` Mark Brown
2014-04-03  9:53     ` Mark Brown
2014-04-03 13:31     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-03 13:31       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-03 15:06       ` Takashi Iwai
2014-04-03 16:02         ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-05  0:12 Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-05  0:12 ` Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-07 12:54 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-07 14:24   ` Takashi Iwai
2014-04-09 15:56 ` Mark Brown
2014-04-09 20:07   ` Arun S L
2014-04-01  6:21 [PATCH] ASoC: DAPM: " Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-01  6:21 ` Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-01  7:48 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
     [not found]   ` <781A12BB53C15A4BB37291FDE08C03F3A05CDCD63B@HQMAIL02.nvidia.com>
2014-04-01 18:26     ` Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-01 18:26       ` Arun Shamanna Lakshmi
2014-04-02  6:00       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-02  6:17         ` Songhee Baek
2014-04-02  6:17           ` Songhee Baek
2014-04-02  6:47           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-02  6:47             ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-02  6:56             ` Songhee Baek
2014-04-02  7:01               ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-02  7:01                 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-02  7:06                 ` Songhee Baek
2014-04-02  7:06                   ` Songhee Baek
2014-04-02 15:26                 ` Songhee Baek
2014-04-02 15:26                   ` Songhee Baek
2014-04-02 15:29                   ` Lars-Peter Clausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533D1B65.3030405@metafoo.de \
    --to=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=aruns@nvidia.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbaek@nvidia.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.