From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, a.hajda@samsung.com,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/exynos: add super device support
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 21:01:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5340530D.5080707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140405185249.GM7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 05.04.2014 20:52, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Maybe my words have been misinterpreted, but all I'm suggesting here is
>> that there is no need to add any new data to DT to solve the same issue
>> to the same extent as componentized subsystem framework, at least in
>> Exynos case.
>
> Right, so we seem to have agreement that what exynos is currently doing
> is fundamentally broken.
>
> So the next question is, how is it going to get fixed?
>
I believe this is a separate issue from what is being discussed in this
thread, but anyway, I'd wait with this until Monday, so we could discuss
this with Inki and Andrzej, who is the person responsible for Exynos DRM
in my team. I was just passing by. ;)
Best regards,
Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/exynos: add super device support
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 21:01:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5340530D.5080707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140405185249.GM7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 05.04.2014 20:52, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Maybe my words have been misinterpreted, but all I'm suggesting here is
>> that there is no need to add any new data to DT to solve the same issue
>> to the same extent as componentized subsystem framework, at least in
>> Exynos case.
>
> Right, so we seem to have agreement that what exynos is currently doing
> is fundamentally broken.
>
> So the next question is, how is it going to get fixed?
>
I believe this is a separate issue from what is being discussed in this
thread, but anyway, I'd wait with this until Monday, so we could discuss
this with Inki and Andrzej, who is the person responsible for Exynos DRM
in my team. I was just passing by. ;)
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-05 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-01 12:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/exynos: more cleanup with super device support Inki Dae
2014-04-01 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/exynos: add " Inki Dae
2014-04-02 14:06 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-04-03 7:43 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-03 8:36 ` [PATCH v3] " Inki Dae
2014-04-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4] " Inki Dae
2014-04-03 14:26 ` [PATCH] drm/exynos: separate dpi from fimd Andrzej Hajda
2014-04-03 16:29 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-03 16:35 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-03 17:01 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/exynos: add super device support Tomasz Figa
2014-04-04 15:44 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-05 17:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-05 17:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-05 18:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-05 18:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-05 18:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-05 18:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-05 18:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-05 18:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-05 19:01 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-04-05 19:01 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-06 4:21 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-06 4:21 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-06 8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-06 8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-06 9:38 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-06 9:38 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-06 3:15 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-06 3:15 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-07 14:18 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-04-07 14:18 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-04-07 14:24 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-07 14:24 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-07 15:16 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-07 15:16 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-07 15:40 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-07 15:40 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-08 8:37 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-08 8:37 ` Inki Dae
2014-04-01 12:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/exynos: dpi: fix hotplug fail issue Inki Dae
2014-04-01 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/exynos: register platform driver at each kms sub drivers Inki Dae
2014-04-01 12:37 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: dts: exynos4210-universal: add super device node for exynos drm Inki Dae
2014-04-01 12:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: dts: exynos4210-trats: " Inki Dae
2014-04-01 12:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: dts: exynos4412-trats2: " Inki Dae
2014-04-01 12:38 ` [PATCH 7/7] exynos/drm: add DT bindings Inki Dae
2014-04-03 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/exynos: more cleanup with super device support Andrzej Hajda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5340530D.5080707@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.