From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Update the ownership and developers for ACPI in Kconfig
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:16:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53435C0F.3090908@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487377.07icAKoM8K@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 2014-4-7 20:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, April 03, 2014 08:37:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> The UEFI Forum included the ACPI spec in its portfolio in October 2013
>> and will host future spec iterations, following the ACPI v5.0a release.
>>
>> A UEFI Forum working group named ACPI Specification Working Group (ASWG)
>> has been established to handle future ACPI developments, any UEFI member
>> can join the group and contribute to ACPI specification.
>>
>> So update the ownership and developers for ACPI in Kconfig accordingly,
>> and update the website link to ACPI specification too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> index c205653..831e541 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> @@ -32,9 +32,10 @@ menuconfig ACPI
>> <http://acpica.org/>
>>
>> ACPI is an open industry specification co-developed by
>> - Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Microsoft, Phoenix, and Toshiba.
>> + ACPI Specification Working Group (ASWG) under UEFI Forum, any
>> + UEFI member can join ASWG and contribute to ACPI specification.
>> The specification is available at:
>> - <http://www.acpi.info>
>
> The spec is still available from here, so why are you removing this link?
My bad, I thought the link below is the replacement for the above one.
>
>> + <http://www.uefi.org/acpi/specs>
How about the replacement below?
- <http://www.acpi.info>
+ <http://www.acpi.info>, or:
+ <http://www.uefi.org/acpi/specs>
Thanks
Hanjun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Update the ownership and developers for ACPI in Kconfig
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:16:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53435C0F.3090908@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487377.07icAKoM8K@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 2014-4-7 20:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, April 03, 2014 08:37:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> The UEFI Forum included the ACPI spec in its portfolio in October 2013
>> and will host future spec iterations, following the ACPI v5.0a release.
>>
>> A UEFI Forum working group named ACPI Specification Working Group (ASWG)
>> has been established to handle future ACPI developments, any UEFI member
>> can join the group and contribute to ACPI specification.
>>
>> So update the ownership and developers for ACPI in Kconfig accordingly,
>> and update the website link to ACPI specification too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> index c205653..831e541 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> @@ -32,9 +32,10 @@ menuconfig ACPI
>> <http://acpica.org/>
>>
>> ACPI is an open industry specification co-developed by
>> - Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Microsoft, Phoenix, and Toshiba.
>> + ACPI Specification Working Group (ASWG) under UEFI Forum, any
>> + UEFI member can join ASWG and contribute to ACPI specification.
>> The specification is available at:
>> - <http://www.acpi.info>
>
> The spec is still available from here, so why are you removing this link?
My bad, I thought the link below is the replacement for the above one.
>
>> + <http://www.uefi.org/acpi/specs>
How about the replacement below?
- <http://www.acpi.info>
+ <http://www.acpi.info>, or:
+ <http://www.uefi.org/acpi/specs>
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-08 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 12:37 [PATCH] ACPI: Update the ownership and developers for ACPI in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-04-03 12:37 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-07 12:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-07 12:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-08 2:16 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2014-04-08 2:16 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-08 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-08 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-08 11:07 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-08 11:07 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53435C0F.3090908@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.