Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?

[Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1150 bytes --]

On 04/10/2014 05:17 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> So far I know of at least three fixes which should probably
> go into 2.0:
>  * my fix for the configure stack-protector checks on MacOSX
>  * MST's pull request updating the ACPI test blobs
>  * MST says we need to update the hex files for ACPI too
>    (otherwise you get a different ACPI blob depending on whether
>     your build system had iasl or not, if I understand correctly)
> 
> Are there any others?

Yes.  The libvirt team is a bit annoyed that the pci bus naming was
changed for PPC but not all architectures, but without a proper QMP
command to probe which naming scheme is in effect.  We thought that the
naming scheme was going to be universally supplied for all arches, not
just PPC.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg01533.html

Is this something that can be quickly fixed (perhaps by reverting the
PPC patch until a more complete solution is ready), and if so, is it
worth doing for 2.0 proper, rather than waiting for 2.0.1?

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]