Re: [PATCH V4 10/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move clock setup to pm.c

[Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>]

On 10.04.2014 16:23, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 03:57 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On 10.04.2014 11:55, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> One more step is moving the clock ratio setting at idle time in pm.c
>>>
>>> The macro names have been changed to be consistent with the other macros
>>> name in the file.
>>>
>>> Note, the clock divider was working only when cpuidle was enabled
>>> because it
>>> was in its init routine. With this change, the clock divider is set in
>>> the pm's
>>> init routine, so it will also operate when the cpuidle driver is not
>>> set, which
>>> is good.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c  |   54
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c       |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h |   19 ++++++++++++++
>>>   3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>
>> Sorry that I didn't mention that before, but now I recall that there was
>> already a similar patch moving this code to Exynos5250 clock driver,
>> which is the best place for setup of any CMU registers and a step
>> towards removing one more static IO mapping.
>
> Yes, Bartlomiej mentioned it.
>
> Is it possible to merge this mentioned patch or to give a pointer to it
> so I can integrate it into the patchset ?

http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138147021207626&w=2

I wonder if it still applies cleanly, though...

Best regards,
Tomasz