From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Possible fb ref count issue with drm_plane_force_disable()
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:40:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53478E65.6090305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53478C42.5080502@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3474 bytes --]
On 11/04/14 09:31, Archit Taneja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 10 April 2014 05:17 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been debugging omapdrm issues on top of the latest drm mainline
>> changes. Sometimes a drm_framebuffer ref count drops to -1 when aborting
>> a drm application, or unloading the modules.
>>
>> The setup is very basic, just a single crtc with the crtc's primary
>> plane.
>>
>> What seems to happen is:
>>
>> - App is started
>>
>> - fb is created, and taken into use by omapdrm. omapdrm takes a ref to
>> the fb.
>>
>> - the app is starts to shut down
>>
>> - drm_framebuffer_remove is called
>
> Does drm_framebuffer_remove get called when we abort the application, or
> unload omapdrm, or both?
Both. When we abort an app, drm_framebuffer_remove gets called for the
fb that the app created. When we unload omapdrm, it gets called for the
main fb, used for fb console.
>> - fb->refcount.refcount > 1, so it goes to disable stuff
>>
>> - drm_plane_force_disable is called for the primary plane
>
> Maybe we need to make sure that this func is called only when our driver
> has unreferenced it. In that case, we would probably need to flush our
> queue and disable interrupts(so that we don't queue more work).
Hmm, sorry, call which func, unreferenced what? =)
Do you mean we should call drm_framebuffer_remove() only if
fb->refcount.refcount == 1. That should be possible, and would probably
remove the issue, but it would just be going around the actual problem.
>> - drm_plane_force_disable does plane->disable_plane, which on omapdrm
>> puts stuff on a workqueue as plane cannot be disabled immediately
>>
>> - drm_plane_force_disable calls __drm_framebuffer_unreference()
>>
>> - at the end of drm_framebuffer_remove(), there's
>> drm_framebuffer_unreference, which causes ref count to go to zero, and
>> the fb to be destroyed
>>
>> - a bit later, the queued work is ran, which does
>> drm_framebuffer_unreference(), and ref count goes to -1. Here omapdrm is
>> removing the ref that had been taken in the beginning.
>>
>>
>> So the explicit unref done by drm_plane_force_disable() seems a bit out
>> of place. I can't figure out which drm_framebuffer_reference() would be
>> the matching one for the unref done by drm_plane_force_disable().
>>
>> Any ideas what ref is that? Or is the __drm_framebuffer_unreference()
>> extra in drm_plane_force_disable()?
>
>
> I can't get the corresponding reference for it either. But I can count 3
> of them when you run fbcon with drm's fb helper.
>
> - One ref is taken in the drm_framebuffer_init called from
> omap_fbdev_create.
>
> - fbcon will call fb_set_par, which calls drm_fb_helper_set_par, that
> seems to take a refernce to the fb in the end.
This one is not called for a normal app, as there's no fbdev framebuffer
for it. Note that the funcs I mention deal with drm framebuffer, which
is not the fbdev framebuffer (confusing =). fbdev fb is only used for
the "root" framebuffer. And, of course, fbdev fb uses the drm fb
functionality.
> - drm_crtc_helper_set_config() calls the omadrm specific mode_set
> drm_crtc_funcs, which eventually calls a drm_framebuffer_reference in
> update_pin().
Yep.
I forgot to mention that if I comment out the unref in
drm_plane_force_disable(), the ref counts match and all looks fine. And
also that I didn't see this issue with 3.14.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 11:47 Possible fb ref count issue with drm_plane_force_disable() Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11 6:31 ` Archit Taneja
2014-04-11 6:40 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2014-04-11 6:57 ` Archit Taneja
2014-04-11 7:03 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11 7:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-11 11:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-14 8:43 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 9:16 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 10:10 ` Rob Clark
2014-04-15 10:29 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-04-15 10:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 12:24 ` Rob Clark
2014-04-15 13:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 22:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-15 12:00 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 21:57 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53478E65.6090305@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.