All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Possible fb ref count issue with drm_plane_force_disable()
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:27:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53479270.6070501@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53478E65.6090305@ti.com>

On Friday 11 April 2014 12:10 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

<snip>

>> Does drm_framebuffer_remove get called when we abort the application, or
>> unload omapdrm, or both?
>
> Both. When we abort an app, drm_framebuffer_remove gets called for the
> fb that the app created. When we unload omapdrm, it gets called for the
> main fb, used for fb console.
>
>>> - fb->refcount.refcount > 1, so it goes to disable stuff
>>>
>>> - drm_plane_force_disable is called for the primary plane
>>
>> Maybe we need to make sure that this func is called only when our driver
>> has unreferenced it. In that case, we would probably need to flush our
>> queue and disable interrupts(so that we don't queue more work).
>
> Hmm, sorry, call which func, unreferenced what? =)
>
> Do you mean we should call drm_framebuffer_remove() only if
> fb->refcount.refcount == 1. That should be possible, and would probably
> remove the issue, but it would just be going around the actual problem.

Yes, I meant our driver should call drm_framebuffer_remove() only when 
we are know that the fb reference omapdrm had taken(the one in 
update_pin), has a corresponding fb unref called(in unpin_worker).

Isn't that something omapdrm should take care of?

<snip>

>> I can't get the corresponding reference for it either. But I can count 3
>> of them when you run fbcon with drm's fb helper.
>>
>> - One ref is taken in the drm_framebuffer_init called from
>> omap_fbdev_create.
>>
>> - fbcon will call fb_set_par, which calls drm_fb_helper_set_par, that
>> seems to take a refernce to the fb in the end.
>
> This one is not called for a normal app, as there's no fbdev framebuffer
> for it. Note that the funcs I mention deal with drm framebuffer, which
> is not the fbdev framebuffer (confusing =). fbdev fb is only used for
> the "root" framebuffer. And, of course, fbdev fb uses the drm fb

Yes. In the case of a normal app, we would call the ADD_FB2 ioctl to get 
a drm_framebuffer, that will internally take a fb reference. So the 
count won't seem to go beyond 2.

> functionality.
>
>> - drm_crtc_helper_set_config() calls the omadrm specific mode_set
>> drm_crtc_funcs, which eventually calls a drm_framebuffer_reference in
>> update_pin().
>
> Yep.
>
> I forgot to mention that if I comment out the unref in
> drm_plane_force_disable(), the ref counts match and all looks fine. And
> also that I didn't see this issue with 3.14.

That's strange. I guess there must be an extra unref happening somewhere 
in the newer commits. Did you try a diff of drm code between the 2 
kernels? :)

Archit

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-11  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-10 11:47 Possible fb ref count issue with drm_plane_force_disable() Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11  6:31 ` Archit Taneja
2014-04-11  6:40   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11  6:57     ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2014-04-11  7:03       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11  7:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-11 11:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-14  8:43   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15  9:16     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 10:10       ` Rob Clark
2014-04-15 10:29         ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-04-15 10:44           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 12:24             ` Rob Clark
2014-04-15 13:30               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 22:01                 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-15 12:00         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 21:57         ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53479270.6070501@ti.com \
    --to=archit@ti.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.