All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>,
	Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>,
	Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
	Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>,
	Shresth Prasad <shresthprasad7@gmail.com>,
	Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add RK3528 support
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 19:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5349721.GXAFRqVoOG@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508135307.14726-1-ziyao@disroot.org>

Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2025, 15:53:06 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Yao Zi:
> Rockchip RK3528 integrates one naneng-combphy that is able to operate in
> PCIe and USB3 mode. The control logic is similar to previous variants of
> naneng-combphy but the register layout is apperantly different from the
> RK3568 one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>
> ---
>  .../rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c    | 180 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 179 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> index 1d1c7723584b..7c92f7ac3c7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,40 @@
>  #define REF_CLOCK_25MHz			(25 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
>  #define REF_CLOCK_100MHz		(100 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
>  
> -/* COMBO PHY REG */
> +/* RK3528 COMBO PHY REG */
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG6				0x18
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO		GENMASK(12, 10)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO_VALUE		0x2
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DIR			GENMASK(5, 4)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_UPWARD		0
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DOWNWARD		1
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG40				0x100
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_EN			BIT(20)
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT		GENMASK(10, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT_VALUE		0x17d
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG42				0x108
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_SEL		BIT(29)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_PLL		0
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_CKRCV	1
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_LPF_R1_ADJ		GENMASK(10, 7)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_LPF_R1_ADJ_VALUE	0x9
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_CHGPUMP_CUR_ADJ	GENMASK(6, 4)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_CHGPUMP_CUR_ADJ_VALUE 0x7
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_KVCO_ADJ		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_KVCO_ADJ_VALUE	0x0
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG80				0x200
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG80_CTLE_EN		BIT(17)
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG81				0x204
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG81_CDR_PHASE_PATH_GAIN_2X	BIT(5)
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG81_SLEW_RATE_CTRL		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG81_SLEW_RATE_CTRL_SLOW	0x7
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG83				0x20c
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG83_RX_SQUELCH		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG83_RX_SQUELCH_VALUE	0x6
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG86				0x218
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG86_RTERM_DET_CLK_EN	BIT(14)

I'd think staying with one layout would be best, so not doing this
indentation here. Instead maybe follow the other ones like

#define RK3528_PHYREG6				0x18
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO		GENMASK(12, 10)
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO_VALUE		0x2
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DIR			GENMASK(5, 4)
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_UPWARD		0
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DOWNWARD		1

#define RK3528_PHYREG40				0x100
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_EN			BIT(20)
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT		GENMASK(10, 0)
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT_VALUE		0x17d

...

i.e. register + bits + blank line

other than that

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>,
	Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>,
	Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
	Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>,
	Shresth Prasad <shresthprasad7@gmail.com>,
	Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add RK3528 support
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 19:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5349721.GXAFRqVoOG@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508135307.14726-1-ziyao@disroot.org>

Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2025, 15:53:06 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Yao Zi:
> Rockchip RK3528 integrates one naneng-combphy that is able to operate in
> PCIe and USB3 mode. The control logic is similar to previous variants of
> naneng-combphy but the register layout is apperantly different from the
> RK3568 one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>
> ---
>  .../rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c    | 180 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 179 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> index 1d1c7723584b..7c92f7ac3c7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,40 @@
>  #define REF_CLOCK_25MHz			(25 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
>  #define REF_CLOCK_100MHz		(100 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
>  
> -/* COMBO PHY REG */
> +/* RK3528 COMBO PHY REG */
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG6				0x18
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO		GENMASK(12, 10)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO_VALUE		0x2
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DIR			GENMASK(5, 4)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_UPWARD		0
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DOWNWARD		1
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG40				0x100
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_EN			BIT(20)
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT		GENMASK(10, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT_VALUE		0x17d
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG42				0x108
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_SEL		BIT(29)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_PLL		0
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_CKRCV	1
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_LPF_R1_ADJ		GENMASK(10, 7)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_LPF_R1_ADJ_VALUE	0x9
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_CHGPUMP_CUR_ADJ	GENMASK(6, 4)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_CHGPUMP_CUR_ADJ_VALUE 0x7
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_KVCO_ADJ		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_KVCO_ADJ_VALUE	0x0
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG80				0x200
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG80_CTLE_EN		BIT(17)
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG81				0x204
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG81_CDR_PHASE_PATH_GAIN_2X	BIT(5)
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG81_SLEW_RATE_CTRL		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG81_SLEW_RATE_CTRL_SLOW	0x7
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG83				0x20c
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG83_RX_SQUELCH		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG83_RX_SQUELCH_VALUE	0x6
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG86				0x218
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG86_RTERM_DET_CLK_EN	BIT(14)

I'd think staying with one layout would be best, so not doing this
indentation here. Instead maybe follow the other ones like

#define RK3528_PHYREG6				0x18
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO		GENMASK(12, 10)
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO_VALUE		0x2
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DIR			GENMASK(5, 4)
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_UPWARD		0
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DOWNWARD		1

#define RK3528_PHYREG40				0x100
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_EN			BIT(20)
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT		GENMASK(10, 0)
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT_VALUE		0x17d

...

i.e. register + bits + blank line

other than that

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>



-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>,
	Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>,
	Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
	Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>,
	Shresth Prasad <shresthprasad7@gmail.com>,
	Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add RK3528 support
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 19:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5349721.GXAFRqVoOG@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508135307.14726-1-ziyao@disroot.org>

Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2025, 15:53:06 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Yao Zi:
> Rockchip RK3528 integrates one naneng-combphy that is able to operate in
> PCIe and USB3 mode. The control logic is similar to previous variants of
> naneng-combphy but the register layout is apperantly different from the
> RK3568 one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>
> ---
>  .../rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c    | 180 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 179 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> index 1d1c7723584b..7c92f7ac3c7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,40 @@
>  #define REF_CLOCK_25MHz			(25 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
>  #define REF_CLOCK_100MHz		(100 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
>  
> -/* COMBO PHY REG */
> +/* RK3528 COMBO PHY REG */
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG6				0x18
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO		GENMASK(12, 10)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO_VALUE		0x2
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DIR			GENMASK(5, 4)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_UPWARD		0
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DOWNWARD		1
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG40				0x100
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_EN			BIT(20)
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT		GENMASK(10, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT_VALUE		0x17d
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG42				0x108
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_SEL		BIT(29)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_PLL		0
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_CKDRV_CLK_CKRCV	1
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_LPF_R1_ADJ		GENMASK(10, 7)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_LPF_R1_ADJ_VALUE	0x9
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_CHGPUMP_CUR_ADJ	GENMASK(6, 4)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_CHGPUMP_CUR_ADJ_VALUE 0x7
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_KVCO_ADJ		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG42_PLL_KVCO_ADJ_VALUE	0x0
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG80				0x200
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG80_CTLE_EN		BIT(17)
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG81				0x204
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG81_CDR_PHASE_PATH_GAIN_2X	BIT(5)
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG81_SLEW_RATE_CTRL		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG81_SLEW_RATE_CTRL_SLOW	0x7
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG83				0x20c
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG83_RX_SQUELCH		GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   RK3528_PHYREG83_RX_SQUELCH_VALUE	0x6
> +#define RK3528_PHYREG86				0x218
> +#define  RK3528_PHYREG86_RTERM_DET_CLK_EN	BIT(14)

I'd think staying with one layout would be best, so not doing this
indentation here. Instead maybe follow the other ones like

#define RK3528_PHYREG6				0x18
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO		GENMASK(12, 10)
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_PLL_KVCO_VALUE		0x2
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DIR			GENMASK(5, 4)
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_UPWARD		0
#define RK3528_PHYREG6_SSC_DOWNWARD		1

#define RK3528_PHYREG40				0x100
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_EN			BIT(20)
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT		GENMASK(10, 0)
#define RK3528_PHYREG40_SSC_CNT_VALUE		0x17d

...

i.e. register + bits + blank line

other than that

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-08 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-08 13:43 [PATCH 0/5] Support RK3528 variant of Rockchip naneng-combphy Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:43 ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:43 ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: Add RK3528 pipe-phy GRF syscon Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:43   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:43   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 14:40   ` Conor Dooley
2025-05-08 14:40     ` Conor Dooley
2025-05-08 14:40     ` Conor Dooley
2025-05-08 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add RK3528 variant Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:43   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:43   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 14:40   ` Conor Dooley
2025-05-08 14:40     ` Conor Dooley
2025-05-08 14:40     ` Conor Dooley
2025-05-08 17:15   ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-08 17:15     ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-08 17:15     ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-08 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add SoC prefix to register definitions Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:52   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:52   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 17:22   ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-08 17:22     ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-08 17:22     ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add RK3528 support Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:53   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:53   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 17:26   ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2025-05-08 17:26     ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-08 17:26     ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-08 23:13     ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 23:13       ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 23:13       ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add naneng-combphy for RK3528 Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:53   ` Yao Zi
2025-05-08 13:53   ` Yao Zi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5349721.GXAFRqVoOG@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=amadeus@jmu.edu.cn \
    --cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
    --cc=detlev.casanova@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frank.wang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shresthprasad7@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziyao@disroot.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.