All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] how should we deal with dead memcgs' kmem caches?
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:56:14 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53555BBE.2020804@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404211128450.28094@gentwo.org>

21.04.2014 20:29, Christoph Lameter:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> 
>> * Way #1 - prevent dead kmem caches from caching slabs on free *
>>
>> We can modify sl[au]b implementation so that it won't cache any objects
>> on free if the kmem cache belongs to a dead memcg. Then it'd be enough
>> to drain per-cpu pools of all dead kmem caches on css offline - no new
>> slabs will be added there on further frees, and the last object will go
>> away along with the last slab.
> 
> You can call kmem_cache_shrink() to force slab allocators to drop cached
> objects after a free.

Yes, but the question is when and how often should we do that? Calling
it after each kfree would be an overkill, because there may be plenty of
objects in a dead cache. Calling it periodically or on vmpressure is the
first thing that springs to mind - that's covered by "way #2".

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] how should we deal with dead memcgs' kmem caches?
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:56:14 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53555BBE.2020804@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404211128450.28094@gentwo.org>

21.04.2014 20:29, Christoph Lameter:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> 
>> * Way #1 - prevent dead kmem caches from caching slabs on free *
>>
>> We can modify sl[au]b implementation so that it won't cache any objects
>> on free if the kmem cache belongs to a dead memcg. Then it'd be enough
>> to drain per-cpu pools of all dead kmem caches on css offline - no new
>> slabs will be added there on further frees, and the last object will go
>> away along with the last slab.
> 
> You can call kmem_cache_shrink() to force slab allocators to drop cached
> objects after a free.

Yes, but the question is when and how often should we do that? Calling
it after each kfree would be an overkill, because there may be plenty of
objects in a dead cache. Calling it periodically or on vmpressure is the
first thing that springs to mind - that's covered by "way #2".

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-21 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-20 10:39 [RFC] how should we deal with dead memcgs' kmem caches? Vladimir Davydov
2014-04-20 10:39 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-04-21 12:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-04-21 12:18   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-04-21 15:00   ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-04-21 15:00     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-04-21 16:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-04-21 16:29   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-04-21 17:56   ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2014-04-21 17:56     ` Vladimir Davydov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53555BBE.2020804@parallels.com \
    --to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.