All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm: exynos: Add MCPM call-back functions
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:21:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535650AE.90501@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398147435-3122-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com>

On 04/22/2014 08:17 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> Add machine-dependent MCPM call-backs for Exynos5420. These are used
> to power up/down the secondary CPUs during boot, shutdown, s2r and
> switching.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig       |    8 +
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile      |    2 +
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c |  345 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h    |    2 +
>   4 files changed, 357 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> index fc8bf18..1602abc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> @@ -110,4 +110,12 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5440
>
>   endmenu
>
> +config EXYNOS5420_MCPM
> +	bool "Exynos5420 Multi-Cluster PM support"
> +	depends on MCPM && SOC_EXYNOS5420
> +	select ARM_CCI
> +	help
> +	  This is needed to provide CPU and cluster power management
> +	  on Exynos5420 implementing big.LITTLE.
> +
>   endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
> index a656dbe..01bc9b9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
> @@ -29,3 +29,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= firmware.o
>
>   plus_sec := $(call as-instr,.arch_extension sec,+sec)
>   AFLAGS_exynos-smc.o		:=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS5420_MCPM)	+= mcpm-exynos.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..49b9031
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + *		http://www.samsung.com
> + *
> + * arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> + *
> + * Based on arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-cci.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/mcpm.h>
> +#include <asm/cputype.h>
> +#include <asm/cp15.h>
> +
> +#include <plat/cpu.h>
> +#include "regs-pmu.h"
> +
> +#define EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER	4
> +#define EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS		2
> +
> +/* Secondary CPU entry point */
> +#define REG_ENTRY_ADDR		(S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1C)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN		0x3
> +#define EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS		0x0
>
> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_COMMON_CONFIGURATION		S5P_PMUREG(0x2500)
> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_L2_CONFIGURATION		S5P_PMUREG(0x2600)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr)	\
> +			(S5P_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr)		\
> +			(S5P_ARM_CORE0_STATUS + ((_nr) * 0x80))
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(_nr)	\
> +			(EXYNOS_ARM_COMMON_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
> +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(_nr)		\
> +			(EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_L2_CONFIGURATION(_nr)		\
> +			(EXYNOS_ARM_L2_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
> +#define EXYNOS_L2_STATUS(_nr)			\
> +			(EXYNOS_L2_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
> +

Is it possible to share the definition of those macros with the rest of 
the code via functions, so they can be re-used for the other sub-systems 
? eg: https://patches.linaro.org/27798/

> +/*
> + * The common v7_exit_coherency_flush API could not be used because of the
> + * Erratum 799270 workaround. This macro is the same as the common one (in
> + * arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h) except for the erratum handling.
> + */
> +#define exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(level) \
> +	asm volatile( \
> +	"stmfd	sp!, {fp, ip}\n\t"\
> +	"mrc	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0	@ get SCTLR\n\t" \
> +	"bic	r0, r0, #"__stringify(CR_C)"\n\t" \
> +	"mcr	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0	@ set SCTLR\n\t" \
> +	"isb\n\t"\
> +	"bl	v7_flush_dcache_"__stringify(level)"\n\t" \
> +	"clrex\n\t"\
> +	"mrc	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1	@ get ACTLR\n\t" \
> +	"bic	r0, r0, #(1 << 6)	@ disable local coherency\n\t" \
> +	/* Dummy Load of a device register to avoid Erratum 799270 */ \

Wouldn't make sense to add the erratum in the Kconfig and re-use it in 
the generic v7_exit_coherency_flush macro instead of redefining it ?

> +	"ldr	r4, [%0]\n\t" \
> +	"and	r4, r4, #0\n\t" \
> +	"orr	r0, r0, r4\n\t" \
> +	"mcr	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1	@ set ACTLR\n\t" \
> +	"isb\n\t" \
> +	"dsb\n\t" \
> +	"ldmfd	sp!, {fp, ip}" \
> +	: \
> +	: "Ir" (S5P_INFORM0) \
> +	: "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7", \
> +	  "r9", "r10", "lr", "memory")



> +/*
> + * We can't use regular spinlocks. In the switcher case, it is possible
> + * for an outbound CPU to call power_down() after its inbound counterpart
> + * is already live using the same logical CPU number which trips lockdep
> + * debugging.
> + */
> +static arch_spinlock_t exynos_mcpm_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> +static int
> +cpu_use_count[EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER][EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS];
> +
> +static bool exynos_core_power_state(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
> +{
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	unsigned int cpunr = cpu + (cluster * EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER);
> +
> +	val = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(cpunr)) &
> +				EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
> +	return !!val;
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos_core_power_control(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster,
> +						int enable)
> +{
> +	unsigned int val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS;
> +	unsigned int cpunr = cpu + (cluster * EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER);
> +
> +	if (exynos_core_power_state(cpu, cluster) == enable)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (enable)
> +		val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
> +	__raw_writel(val, EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpunr));
> +}

Same comment as above about sharing these functions.

Shouldn't these functions to be reused by hotplug ?

> +static void exynos_cluster_power_control(unsigned int cluster, int enable)
> +{
> +	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(20);
> +	unsigned int status, val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS;
> +
> +	if (enable)
> +		val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
> +
> +	status = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(cluster));
> +	if ((status & EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) == val)
> +		return;
> +
> +	__raw_writel(val, EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(cluster));
> +	/* Wait until cluster power control is applied */
> +	while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> +		status = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(cluster));
> +
> +		if ((status & EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) == val)
> +			return;
> +
> +		cpu_relax();
> +	}
> +	pr_warn("timed out waiting for cluster %u to power %s\n", cluster,
> +		enable ? "on" : "off");
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos_power_up(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
> +{
> +	pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
> +	if (cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
> +		cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Since this is called with IRQs enabled, and no arch_spin_lock_irq
> +	 * variant exists, we need to disable IRQs manually here.
> +	 */
> +	local_irq_disable();
> +	arch_spin_lock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +
> +	cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster]++;
> +	if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 1) {
> +		bool was_cluster_down =
> +			__mcpm_cluster_state(cluster) == CLUSTER_DOWN;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Turn on the cluster (L2/COMMON) and then power on the cores.
> +		 * TODO: Turn off the clusters when all cores in the cluster
> +		 * are down to achieve significant power savings.
> +		 */
> +		if (was_cluster_down)
> +			exynos_cluster_power_control(cluster, 1);
> +		exynos_core_power_control(cpu, cluster, 1);
> +
> +		/* CPU should be powered up there */
> +		/* Also setup Cluster Power Sequence here */
> +	} else if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] != 2) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The only possible values are:
> +		 * 0 = CPU down
> +		 * 1 = CPU (still) up
> +		 * 2 = CPU requested to be up before it had a chance
> +		 *     to actually make itself down.
> +		 * Any other value is a bug.
> +		 */
> +		BUG();
> +	}
> +
> +	arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +	local_irq_enable();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos_power_down(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster, cpumask;
> +	bool last_man = false, skip_wfi = false;
> +
> +	mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> +	cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> +	cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> +	cpumask = (1 << cpu);

This variable is not used.

> +
> +	pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
> +	BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
> +			cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
> +
> +	__mcpm_cpu_going_down(cpu, cluster);
> +
> +	arch_spin_lock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +	BUG_ON(__mcpm_cluster_state(cluster) != CLUSTER_UP);
> +	cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster]--;
> +	if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 0) {
> +		int cnt = 0, i;
> +
> +		exynos_core_power_control(cpu, cluster, 0);
> +		for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER; i++)
> +			cnt += cpu_use_count[i][cluster];
> +		if (cnt == 0)
> +			last_man = true;
> +	} else if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 1) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A power_up request went ahead of us.
> +		 * Even if we do not want to shut this CPU down,
> +		 * the caller expects a certain state as if the WFI
> +		 * was aborted.  So let's continue with cache cleaning.
> +		 */
> +		skip_wfi = true;
> +	} else {
> +		BUG();
> +	}
> +
> +	if (last_man && __mcpm_outbound_enter_critical(cpu, cluster)) {
> +		arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +
> +		/* Flush all cache levels for this cluster. */
> +		exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(all);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Disable cluster-level coherency by masking
> +		 * incoming snoops and DVM messages:
> +		 */
> +		cci_disable_port_by_cpu(mpidr);
> +
> +		__mcpm_outbound_leave_critical(cluster, CLUSTER_DOWN);
> +	} else {
> +		arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +
> +		/* Disable and flush the local CPU cache. */
> +		exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(louis);
> +	}
> +
> +	__mcpm_cpu_down(cpu, cluster);
> +
> +	/* Now we are prepared for power-down, do it: */
> +	if (!skip_wfi)
> +		wfi();
> +
> +	/* Not dead at this point?  Let our caller cope. */
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
> +{
> +	pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
> +	BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
> +			cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
> +
> +	/* Wait for the core state to be OFF */
> +	while (exynos_core_power_state(cpu, cluster) != 0x0)
> +		;

As this is a potential infinite loop, a timeout may be desirable, no ?

> +
> +	return 0; /* success: the CPU is halted */
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mcpm_platform_ops exynos_power_ops = {
> +	.power_up		= exynos_power_up,
> +	.power_down		= exynos_power_down,
> +	.power_down_finish	= exynos_power_down_finish,
> +};
> +
> +static void __init exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster;
> +
> +	mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> +	cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> +	cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> +
> +	pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
> +	BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER  ||
> +			cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
> +
> +	cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] = 1;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Enable cluster-level coherency, in preparation for turning on the MMU.
> + */
> +static void __naked exynos_pm_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level)
> +{
> +	asm volatile ("\n"
> +	"cmp	r0, #1\n"
> +	"bxne	lr\n"
> +	"b	cci_enable_port_for_self");
> +}
> +
> +static int __init exynos_mcpm_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!soc_is_exynos5420())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!cci_probed())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * To increase the stability of KFC reset we need to program
> +	 * the PMU SPARE3 register
> +	 */
> +	__raw_writel(EXYNOS5420_SWRESET_KFC_SEL, S5P_PMU_SPARE3);
> +
> +	exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init();
> +
> +	ret = mcpm_platform_register(&exynos_power_ops);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		ret = mcpm_sync_init(exynos_pm_power_up_setup);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mcpm_smp_set_ops();
> +
> +	pr_info("Exynos MCPM support installed\n");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Future entries into the kernel can now go
> +	 * through the cluster entry vectors.
> +	 */
> +	__raw_writel(virt_to_phys(mcpm_entry_point),
> +		REG_ENTRY_ADDR);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +early_initcall(exynos_mcpm_init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
> index cfbfc575..43fe7a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>   #define S5P_INFORM5				S5P_PMUREG(0x0814)
>   #define S5P_INFORM6				S5P_PMUREG(0x0818)
>   #define S5P_INFORM7				S5P_PMUREG(0x081C)
> +#define S5P_PMU_SPARE3				S5P_PMUREG(0x090C)
>
>   #define EXYNOS_IROM_DATA2			S5P_PMUREG(0x0988)
>
> @@ -540,5 +541,6 @@
>   #define EXYNOS5420_KFC_USE_STANDBY_WFE3				(1 << 23)
>
>   #define DUR_WAIT_RESET				0xF
> +#define EXYNOS5420_SWRESET_KFC_SEL		0x3
>
>   #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_REGS_PMU_H */
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Abhilash Kesavan
	<a.kesavan-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	abrestic-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	thomas.ab-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	inderpal.s-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	nicolas.pitre-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Dave.Martin-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	t.figa-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
Cc: mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org,
	will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm: exynos: Add MCPM call-back functions
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:21:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535650AE.90501@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398147435-3122-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>

On 04/22/2014 08:17 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> Add machine-dependent MCPM call-backs for Exynos5420. These are used
> to power up/down the secondary CPUs during boot, shutdown, s2r and
> switching.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig       |    8 +
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile      |    2 +
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c |  345 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h    |    2 +
>   4 files changed, 357 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> index fc8bf18..1602abc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> @@ -110,4 +110,12 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5440
>
>   endmenu
>
> +config EXYNOS5420_MCPM
> +	bool "Exynos5420 Multi-Cluster PM support"
> +	depends on MCPM && SOC_EXYNOS5420
> +	select ARM_CCI
> +	help
> +	  This is needed to provide CPU and cluster power management
> +	  on Exynos5420 implementing big.LITTLE.
> +
>   endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
> index a656dbe..01bc9b9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
> @@ -29,3 +29,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= firmware.o
>
>   plus_sec := $(call as-instr,.arch_extension sec,+sec)
>   AFLAGS_exynos-smc.o		:=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS5420_MCPM)	+= mcpm-exynos.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..49b9031
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + *		http://www.samsung.com
> + *
> + * arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> + *
> + * Based on arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-cci.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/mcpm.h>
> +#include <asm/cputype.h>
> +#include <asm/cp15.h>
> +
> +#include <plat/cpu.h>
> +#include "regs-pmu.h"
> +
> +#define EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER	4
> +#define EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS		2
> +
> +/* Secondary CPU entry point */
> +#define REG_ENTRY_ADDR		(S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1C)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN		0x3
> +#define EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS		0x0
>
> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_COMMON_CONFIGURATION		S5P_PMUREG(0x2500)
> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_L2_CONFIGURATION		S5P_PMUREG(0x2600)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr)	\
> +			(S5P_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr)		\
> +			(S5P_ARM_CORE0_STATUS + ((_nr) * 0x80))
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(_nr)	\
> +			(EXYNOS_ARM_COMMON_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
> +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(_nr)		\
> +			(EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_L2_CONFIGURATION(_nr)		\
> +			(EXYNOS_ARM_L2_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
> +#define EXYNOS_L2_STATUS(_nr)			\
> +			(EXYNOS_L2_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
> +

Is it possible to share the definition of those macros with the rest of 
the code via functions, so they can be re-used for the other sub-systems 
? eg: https://patches.linaro.org/27798/

> +/*
> + * The common v7_exit_coherency_flush API could not be used because of the
> + * Erratum 799270 workaround. This macro is the same as the common one (in
> + * arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h) except for the erratum handling.
> + */
> +#define exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(level) \
> +	asm volatile( \
> +	"stmfd	sp!, {fp, ip}\n\t"\
> +	"mrc	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0	@ get SCTLR\n\t" \
> +	"bic	r0, r0, #"__stringify(CR_C)"\n\t" \
> +	"mcr	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0	@ set SCTLR\n\t" \
> +	"isb\n\t"\
> +	"bl	v7_flush_dcache_"__stringify(level)"\n\t" \
> +	"clrex\n\t"\
> +	"mrc	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1	@ get ACTLR\n\t" \
> +	"bic	r0, r0, #(1 << 6)	@ disable local coherency\n\t" \
> +	/* Dummy Load of a device register to avoid Erratum 799270 */ \

Wouldn't make sense to add the erratum in the Kconfig and re-use it in 
the generic v7_exit_coherency_flush macro instead of redefining it ?

> +	"ldr	r4, [%0]\n\t" \
> +	"and	r4, r4, #0\n\t" \
> +	"orr	r0, r0, r4\n\t" \
> +	"mcr	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1	@ set ACTLR\n\t" \
> +	"isb\n\t" \
> +	"dsb\n\t" \
> +	"ldmfd	sp!, {fp, ip}" \
> +	: \
> +	: "Ir" (S5P_INFORM0) \
> +	: "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7", \
> +	  "r9", "r10", "lr", "memory")



> +/*
> + * We can't use regular spinlocks. In the switcher case, it is possible
> + * for an outbound CPU to call power_down() after its inbound counterpart
> + * is already live using the same logical CPU number which trips lockdep
> + * debugging.
> + */
> +static arch_spinlock_t exynos_mcpm_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> +static int
> +cpu_use_count[EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER][EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS];
> +
> +static bool exynos_core_power_state(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
> +{
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	unsigned int cpunr = cpu + (cluster * EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER);
> +
> +	val = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(cpunr)) &
> +				EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
> +	return !!val;
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos_core_power_control(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster,
> +						int enable)
> +{
> +	unsigned int val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS;
> +	unsigned int cpunr = cpu + (cluster * EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER);
> +
> +	if (exynos_core_power_state(cpu, cluster) == enable)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (enable)
> +		val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
> +	__raw_writel(val, EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpunr));
> +}

Same comment as above about sharing these functions.

Shouldn't these functions to be reused by hotplug ?

> +static void exynos_cluster_power_control(unsigned int cluster, int enable)
> +{
> +	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(20);
> +	unsigned int status, val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS;
> +
> +	if (enable)
> +		val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
> +
> +	status = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(cluster));
> +	if ((status & EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) == val)
> +		return;
> +
> +	__raw_writel(val, EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(cluster));
> +	/* Wait until cluster power control is applied */
> +	while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> +		status = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(cluster));
> +
> +		if ((status & EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) == val)
> +			return;
> +
> +		cpu_relax();
> +	}
> +	pr_warn("timed out waiting for cluster %u to power %s\n", cluster,
> +		enable ? "on" : "off");
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos_power_up(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
> +{
> +	pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
> +	if (cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
> +		cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Since this is called with IRQs enabled, and no arch_spin_lock_irq
> +	 * variant exists, we need to disable IRQs manually here.
> +	 */
> +	local_irq_disable();
> +	arch_spin_lock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +
> +	cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster]++;
> +	if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 1) {
> +		bool was_cluster_down =
> +			__mcpm_cluster_state(cluster) == CLUSTER_DOWN;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Turn on the cluster (L2/COMMON) and then power on the cores.
> +		 * TODO: Turn off the clusters when all cores in the cluster
> +		 * are down to achieve significant power savings.
> +		 */
> +		if (was_cluster_down)
> +			exynos_cluster_power_control(cluster, 1);
> +		exynos_core_power_control(cpu, cluster, 1);
> +
> +		/* CPU should be powered up there */
> +		/* Also setup Cluster Power Sequence here */
> +	} else if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] != 2) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The only possible values are:
> +		 * 0 = CPU down
> +		 * 1 = CPU (still) up
> +		 * 2 = CPU requested to be up before it had a chance
> +		 *     to actually make itself down.
> +		 * Any other value is a bug.
> +		 */
> +		BUG();
> +	}
> +
> +	arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +	local_irq_enable();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos_power_down(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster, cpumask;
> +	bool last_man = false, skip_wfi = false;
> +
> +	mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> +	cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> +	cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> +	cpumask = (1 << cpu);

This variable is not used.

> +
> +	pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
> +	BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
> +			cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
> +
> +	__mcpm_cpu_going_down(cpu, cluster);
> +
> +	arch_spin_lock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +	BUG_ON(__mcpm_cluster_state(cluster) != CLUSTER_UP);
> +	cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster]--;
> +	if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 0) {
> +		int cnt = 0, i;
> +
> +		exynos_core_power_control(cpu, cluster, 0);
> +		for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER; i++)
> +			cnt += cpu_use_count[i][cluster];
> +		if (cnt == 0)
> +			last_man = true;
> +	} else if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 1) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A power_up request went ahead of us.
> +		 * Even if we do not want to shut this CPU down,
> +		 * the caller expects a certain state as if the WFI
> +		 * was aborted.  So let's continue with cache cleaning.
> +		 */
> +		skip_wfi = true;
> +	} else {
> +		BUG();
> +	}
> +
> +	if (last_man && __mcpm_outbound_enter_critical(cpu, cluster)) {
> +		arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +
> +		/* Flush all cache levels for this cluster. */
> +		exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(all);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Disable cluster-level coherency by masking
> +		 * incoming snoops and DVM messages:
> +		 */
> +		cci_disable_port_by_cpu(mpidr);
> +
> +		__mcpm_outbound_leave_critical(cluster, CLUSTER_DOWN);
> +	} else {
> +		arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
> +
> +		/* Disable and flush the local CPU cache. */
> +		exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(louis);
> +	}
> +
> +	__mcpm_cpu_down(cpu, cluster);
> +
> +	/* Now we are prepared for power-down, do it: */
> +	if (!skip_wfi)
> +		wfi();
> +
> +	/* Not dead at this point?  Let our caller cope. */
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
> +{
> +	pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
> +	BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
> +			cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
> +
> +	/* Wait for the core state to be OFF */
> +	while (exynos_core_power_state(cpu, cluster) != 0x0)
> +		;

As this is a potential infinite loop, a timeout may be desirable, no ?

> +
> +	return 0; /* success: the CPU is halted */
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mcpm_platform_ops exynos_power_ops = {
> +	.power_up		= exynos_power_up,
> +	.power_down		= exynos_power_down,
> +	.power_down_finish	= exynos_power_down_finish,
> +};
> +
> +static void __init exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster;
> +
> +	mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> +	cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> +	cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> +
> +	pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
> +	BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER  ||
> +			cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
> +
> +	cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] = 1;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Enable cluster-level coherency, in preparation for turning on the MMU.
> + */
> +static void __naked exynos_pm_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level)
> +{
> +	asm volatile ("\n"
> +	"cmp	r0, #1\n"
> +	"bxne	lr\n"
> +	"b	cci_enable_port_for_self");
> +}
> +
> +static int __init exynos_mcpm_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!soc_is_exynos5420())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!cci_probed())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * To increase the stability of KFC reset we need to program
> +	 * the PMU SPARE3 register
> +	 */
> +	__raw_writel(EXYNOS5420_SWRESET_KFC_SEL, S5P_PMU_SPARE3);
> +
> +	exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init();
> +
> +	ret = mcpm_platform_register(&exynos_power_ops);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		ret = mcpm_sync_init(exynos_pm_power_up_setup);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mcpm_smp_set_ops();
> +
> +	pr_info("Exynos MCPM support installed\n");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Future entries into the kernel can now go
> +	 * through the cluster entry vectors.
> +	 */
> +	__raw_writel(virt_to_phys(mcpm_entry_point),
> +		REG_ENTRY_ADDR);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +early_initcall(exynos_mcpm_init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
> index cfbfc575..43fe7a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>   #define S5P_INFORM5				S5P_PMUREG(0x0814)
>   #define S5P_INFORM6				S5P_PMUREG(0x0818)
>   #define S5P_INFORM7				S5P_PMUREG(0x081C)
> +#define S5P_PMU_SPARE3				S5P_PMUREG(0x090C)
>
>   #define EXYNOS_IROM_DATA2			S5P_PMUREG(0x0988)
>
> @@ -540,5 +541,6 @@
>   #define EXYNOS5420_KFC_USE_STANDBY_WFE3				(1 << 23)
>
>   #define DUR_WAIT_RESET				0xF
> +#define EXYNOS5420_SWRESET_KFC_SEL		0x3
>
>   #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_REGS_PMU_H */
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-11 18:01 [PATCH 0/5] MCPM backend for Exynos5420 Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: bL_switcher: Don't enable bL switcher on systems without CCI Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:14   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-11 18:14     ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-16 19:10     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-16 19:10       ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-16 20:18       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-16 20:18         ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-21 15:57         ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-21 15:57           ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-21 23:37           ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-21 23:37             ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] drivers/bus: arm-cci: Add common control interface for ACE ports Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:24   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-11 18:24     ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-11 19:16     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 19:16       ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: EXYNOS5420: Add IO mapping for non-secure SYSRAM Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-14 11:25   ` Dave Martin
2014-04-14 11:25     ` Dave Martin
2014-04-14 11:47     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-14 11:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-14 11:59       ` Dave Martin
2014-04-14 11:59         ` Dave Martin
2014-04-14 13:24         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-14 13:24           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-16 19:10           ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-16 19:10             ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: exynos5420: add CCI node Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-22  6:16   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-22  6:16     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm: exynos: Add MCPM call-back functions Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 18:01   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-11 20:23   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-11 20:23     ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-14 10:41     ` Dave Martin
2014-04-14 10:41       ` Dave Martin
2014-04-14 14:01       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-14 14:01         ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-15  8:36         ` Dave Martin
2014-04-15  8:36           ` Dave Martin
2014-04-16 19:11           ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-16 19:11             ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-17 10:03             ` Dave Martin
2014-04-17 10:03               ` Dave Martin
2014-04-21 15:57               ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-21 15:57                 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-22  2:11                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-22  2:11                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-16 19:11       ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-16 19:11         ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-17  9:59         ` Dave Martin
2014-04-17  9:59           ` Dave Martin
2014-04-17 15:20           ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-17 15:20             ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-17 15:38             ` Dave Martin
2014-04-17 15:38               ` Dave Martin
2014-04-21 15:57               ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-21 15:57                 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-16 19:11     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-16 19:11       ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-22  6:17   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] " Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-22  6:17     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-22 11:21     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-04-22 11:21       ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-22 15:40       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-22 15:40         ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-22 19:21         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-22 19:21           ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-22 19:56           ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-22 19:56             ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-23 15:31             ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-23 15:31               ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-23 16:13             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-04-23 16:13               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-17  2:38               ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-06-17  2:38                 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-06-19  8:56                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-19  8:56                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-19 12:23                   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-06-19 12:23                     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-23 15:31       ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-23 15:31         ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-23 20:56         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-23 20:56           ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-22 19:18     ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-22 19:18       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-23 15:31       ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-23 15:31         ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-22  6:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] MCPM backend for Exynos5420 Abhilash Kesavan
2014-04-22  6:16   ` Abhilash Kesavan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=535650AE.90501@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.