From: david.vrabel@citrix.com (David Vrabel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm/xen: Remove definiition of virt_to_pfn in asm/xen/page.h
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:22:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535901F0.3010908@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397836474-10478-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>
On 18/04/14 16:54, Julien Grall wrote:
> virt_to_pfn has been defined in asm/memory.h by the commit e26a9e0 "ARM: Better
> virt_to_page() handling"
>
> This will result of a compilation warning when CONFIG_XEN is enabled.
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h:80:0: warning: "virt_to_pfn" redefined [enabled by default]
> #define virt_to_pfn(v) (PFN_DOWN(__pa(v)))
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/page.h:163:0,
> from arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h:4,
> from include/xen/page.h:4,
> from arch/arm/xen/grant-table.c:33:
>
> The definition in memory.h is nearly the same (it directly expand PFN_DOWN),
> so we can safely drop virt_to_pfn in xen include.
This breaks the arm build for me.
/local/davidvr/work/k.org/tip/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c: In function
?setup_blkring?:
/local/davidvr/work/k.org/tip/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1236:2:
error: implicit declaration of function ?virt_to_pfn?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
err = xenbus_grant_ring(dev, virt_to_mfn(info->ring.sring));
^
David
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Cc: <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
<ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/xen: Remove definiition of virt_to_pfn in asm/xen/page.h
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:22:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535901F0.3010908@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397836474-10478-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>
On 18/04/14 16:54, Julien Grall wrote:
> virt_to_pfn has been defined in asm/memory.h by the commit e26a9e0 "ARM: Better
> virt_to_page() handling"
>
> This will result of a compilation warning when CONFIG_XEN is enabled.
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h:80:0: warning: "virt_to_pfn" redefined [enabled by default]
> #define virt_to_pfn(v) (PFN_DOWN(__pa(v)))
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/page.h:163:0,
> from arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h:4,
> from include/xen/page.h:4,
> from arch/arm/xen/grant-table.c:33:
>
> The definition in memory.h is nearly the same (it directly expand PFN_DOWN),
> so we can safely drop virt_to_pfn in xen include.
This breaks the arm build for me.
/local/davidvr/work/k.org/tip/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c: In function
‘setup_blkring’:
/local/davidvr/work/k.org/tip/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1236:2:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘virt_to_pfn’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
err = xenbus_grant_ring(dev, virt_to_mfn(info->ring.sring));
^
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-24 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-18 15:54 [PATCH] arm/xen: Remove definiition of virt_to_pfn in asm/xen/page.h Julien Grall
2014-04-18 15:54 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-24 12:22 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-24 12:22 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-04-24 12:22 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-24 12:49 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-24 12:49 ` Julien Grall
2014-04-24 14:11 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-24 14:11 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-25 17:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-25 17:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-07 11:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-07 11:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-07 11:46 ` David Vrabel
2014-05-07 11:46 ` David Vrabel
2014-05-07 16:58 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-07 16:58 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-08 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 15:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-08 15:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-08 15:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-08 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-07 16:58 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-07 11:46 ` David Vrabel
2014-05-07 11:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-25 17:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-04-24 14:11 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-24 12:49 ` Julien Grall
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-18 15:54 Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535901F0.3010908@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.