From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Karl Heiss <kheiss@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sctp: Don't transition to PF state when transport has exhausted 'Path.Max.Retra
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:35:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A649E.4090309@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398367008-27452-1-git-send-email-kheiss@gmail.com>
On 04/24/2014 03:16 PM, Karl Heiss wrote:
> Don't transition to the PF state on every strike after 'Path.Max.Retrans'. This
> also prevents sending SCTP_ADDR_UNREACHABLE to the user as the state bounces
> between SCTP_INACTIVE and SCTP_PF for each subsequent strike.
>
Good catch. We should never move to PF from INACTIVE. I'd rather you
make it explicit by checking state rather then error counts.
Thanks
-vlad
> Signed-off-by: Karl Heiss <kheiss@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> index 5d6883f..07f26fe 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> @@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands,
> if ((transport->state != SCTP_PF) &&
> (transport->state != SCTP_UNCONFIRMED) &&
> (asoc->pf_retrans < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
> - (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
> + (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans) &&
> + (transport->error_count <= transport->pathmaxrxt)) {
>
> sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
> SCTP_TRANSPORT_PF,
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Karl Heiss <kheiss@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sctp: Don't transition to PF state when transport has exhausted 'Path.Max.Retrans'.
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:35:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A649E.4090309@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398367008-27452-1-git-send-email-kheiss@gmail.com>
On 04/24/2014 03:16 PM, Karl Heiss wrote:
> Don't transition to the PF state on every strike after 'Path.Max.Retrans'. This
> also prevents sending SCTP_ADDR_UNREACHABLE to the user as the state bounces
> between SCTP_INACTIVE and SCTP_PF for each subsequent strike.
>
Good catch. We should never move to PF from INACTIVE. I'd rather you
make it explicit by checking state rather then error counts.
Thanks
-vlad
> Signed-off-by: Karl Heiss <kheiss@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> index 5d6883f..07f26fe 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> @@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands,
> if ((transport->state != SCTP_PF) &&
> (transport->state != SCTP_UNCONFIRMED) &&
> (asoc->pf_retrans < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
> - (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
> + (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans) &&
> + (transport->error_count <= transport->pathmaxrxt)) {
>
> sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
> SCTP_TRANSPORT_PF,
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-25 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1398367008-27452-1-git-send-email-kheiss@gmail.com>
2014-04-25 13:35 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-04-25 13:35 ` [PATCH net] net: sctp: Don't transition to PF state when transport has exhausted 'Path.Max.Retrans' Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-25 13:28 Karl Heiss
2014-04-25 13:30 ` [PATCH net] net: sctp: Don't transition to PF state when transport has exhausted 'Path.Max.Retra Neil Horman
2014-04-25 13:39 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535A649E.4090309@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=kheiss@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.